Your personal experience is exactly that: your personal experience. It is utterly unverifiable and irrelevant to answering the question at hand, though I am sure it does seem relevant from your perspective. Furthermore: 1) A man's being "masculine" or not has no relationship with the size of his penis. 2) A sample of five individuals from the Stockholm area is neither random nor sufficiently large to be statistically valid. 3) Zero "bigger than average" in a sample of only five penes would not be notably surprising even if your assessment of their being average were objectively accurate (after all, I have no idea what you consider to be "average"). Besides, not finding an instance of a penis that is strikingly larger than your idea of "average" has absolutely no relevance to the question of whether the mean penis size of Scandinavian males is the largest in Europe.