I'm not trying to step on anyones toes here, or penises for that fact... I know we can all be patriotic... It was a harmless question, and I hope I haven't offended anyone....
with that said... It is said that black men are usually well known for having a bigger penis than white men. myth or fact, I don't know if it can be proven... But, is this because thousands of years ago, most black men used to live in a hotter climate (Africa)? So it hangs longer because it's too hot when it's too close to the body? So using that logic, most white men used to live in colder climates (Scandinavia for example), is this why the penis could be a bit smaller? Less chance of freezing, and protecting the sperm because it's closer to the body?
AGAIN, I have no beef with Scandinavians and the beef they're packing... I'm just curious....
It has nothing to do with being patriotic, it has to do with the ability to think further than your own experiences. To say "Scandinavians have smaller dicks than many other nations", when you've met, oh.. a handful or two(?) guys from a whole population, is just stupid. You can't judge a population of millions from a selection of maybe 10, 20 or even 50 people from that population. It's just as stupid as other generalizations (spelling?), such as; "I've only met 10 black guys, but they were all criminals in one way or another; damn, blacks are all just a bunch of thugs", or "I've met a lot of americans, hundreds, they were all fat, stupid fucks; the whole of America is just filled with fat, lazy, uneducated people". - It's just stupid to judge such a huge population after having a small number of experiences with that population; just like your statement.
And the fact that you actually write out a theory for your (foolish) statement, means you actually believe in it. Try to think in a bigger perspective. :smile:
Although I basically agree and size as well as form are determined by genetics, there is however a point of truth in this observation. I have been around larger part of the world. I found it striking that Arab, Americans, UK-men and Australians, at least for those who I met and those who I saw naked - generally are shaped larger than other nationalities such as Asians e.g. As to the point of statistics... one can proove or disagree with the statement made depending on how the figures are interpreted. So, I, for one, cannot say I attach much value on statistical analyses of any kind.
I am often jealous on Americans and Britisch for how hung they are, while I am rather short (15 cm).
Again, you've met a small selection of the populations of those different nations, someone else, who've been to the same places, will have seen a lot of below average guys and formed the idea that "Oh, Arab, American, UK and Australian men are all so damn small".
Atleast statistics have a chance to do something on a bigger level, with a greater selection from a population, to prove a (somwhat true, though relative) point, if they're correctly made. Of course I agree with the statitics of being a bit.. suspicious, and as always, you have to analyze them with narrow eyes. :smile:
"the first link goes here:
World Erect Penis Size Average Results by Country and Race in cm and inches - Sweden has a higher average than both UK and Australia.
(And both Norway and Denmark too - bigger than UK and Australia)."
Very suspect "survey" if you ask me. (How in the world would you be able to survey North Koreans?)
anyway, got to go book my research trip to Bolivia.
North Koreans, if some nation, should be quite easy to research, shouldn't they? :tongue: Their great leader just have to order the whole population to get their penis measured, and so happens.
Yes, I believe it's a bit suspect.... it has 'self reported' on there.... and majority of the time.... people don't tell the truth about size if they dont have to prove it....
Yeah, of course it's suspicous, and of course a self reported study will have less punch than a study performed with staff overseeing the process, but I'd say, because of it's greater width in number of people involved from the population analyzed, it still has a tad better accuracy than one single persons own observations off a very slim and limited group from a huge population. :smile:
I'm not trying to harass you. :tongue: Just want you to open your eyes just a bit wider, see it in a bigger perspective and loose the narrow sight you're viewing this from now. :smile:
