Scott Nails
- Thread starter mindfawk
- Start date
I agree. I have no problem with the ladies. I can look beyond them and solely focus on the man.:biggrin1:
He has a nice look; his body is nicely shaped - at least in the early photos (he has great abs) - and his cock is wonderfully thick.
But I am startled by the fact he isn't using any condoms. I mean don't get me wrong. There are several stars - and indeed companies that promote themselves - within the gay porn industry that don't use condoms. Bareback for some has become a fetish for some viewers and the industry sometimes cater to that. But in the time we're currently living in I think that's really stupid. I don't know the in's and out's of the porn industry and perhaps the performers are paid more in other to bareback, but to me that's like playing Russian Roulette with your life...but instead of one bullet in the gun...you have five.
Preakness
Sexy Member
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2009
- Posts
- 945
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 33
- Points
- 173
- Location
- Auckland (New Zealand)
- Gender
- Male
D_CountdeGrandePinja
Account Disabled
Wow, surprised at that tape shot. Based on a scene I've got of him and jenna haze, I thought he was at least 8.5.
Preakness
Sexy Member
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2009
- Posts
- 945
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 33
- Points
- 173
- Location
- Auckland (New Zealand)
- Gender
- Male
I dont really like to use the body size difference perspective, but Jenna Haze is pretty tiny. Wiki says 5' 3" and 92 pounds.
If he was with someone like Puma Swede instead, it might not look so huge.
8.5 would make him longer than Preston Parker, for example.
http://www.lpsg.org/2140573-post41.html
Incocknito
Sexy Member
Preakness
Sexy Member
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2009
- Posts
- 945
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 33
- Points
- 173
- Location
- Auckland (New Zealand)
- Gender
- Male
I dont know which international body decides the correct way to measure a penis, but yeah, most people on here go by on-the-top values.
Going from the side adds a bit more length.
Preakness
Sexy Member
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2009
- Posts
- 945
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 33
- Points
- 173
- Location
- Auckland (New Zealand)
- Gender
- Male
The common theme from the measured porn stars thread is that most people seem to overestimate size.
I think its pretty representative of his size.
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2009
- Posts
- 1,223
- Media
- 2
- Likes
- 800
- Points
- 358
- Location
- New York (United States)
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- 100% Straight, 0% Gay
- Gender
- Male
Jenna Haze is freakin' tiny...
I'd give Scott Nails the benefit of the doubt as the photo that Preakness posted/linked to (and the other one of Scott Nails on the "measured porn star" thread) isn't exactly perfect; the pants make it tough to be exact. I'd say 7.5" give or take a quarter of an inch, maybe a bit more.
With all of these photos its actually tough to tell to within a half an inch. Which really makes sense when you think about it...A half an inch is a damn small amount of length.
I'd give Scott Nails the benefit of the doubt as the photo that Preakness posted/linked to (and the other one of Scott Nails on the "measured porn star" thread) isn't exactly perfect; the pants make it tough to be exact. I'd say 7.5" give or take a quarter of an inch, maybe a bit more.
With all of these photos its actually tough to tell to within a half an inch. Which really makes sense when you think about it...A half an inch is a damn small amount of length.
