B_josiah852
Sexy Member
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2006
- Posts
- 1,958
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 57
- Points
- 183
- Location
- In the Rolling Hills
- Sexuality
- 69% Straight, 31% Gay
- Gender
- Male
"seen one dick, seen them all?"
- Thread starter BIGdkluver
- Start date
That very last statement is what I was basically getting at. Yes, there are vast differences. Some are bit, some short, some thick, some skinny, some have blunt heads, some (like mine) have heads that are almost separate entities, etc. But at the end of the day, they are all just cocks. They all have a shaft and a head. Because I am straight, I suppose my interest in their differences isn't over-ridden by my awareness that, after all, they're all pretty much the same thing, or at least variations on the same basic model -- a model that isn't that interesting.
I think the statement "seen one, seen 'em all" is mostly used by people who don't want to see cock -- some straight men and some sexually repressed women.
It is one of the most ridiculous statements I've ever heard. I've encountered quite a variety in real life, and they not only come in all shapes and sizes, but they also have unique sensitivity patterns and performance characteristics (now I sound like I'm rating automobiles).
One has only to browse the galleries on this site to thoroughly disprove the statement.
The only thing the same about all cocks is that they are all...cocks. :biggrin1:
That's exactly what I mean. I understand the basic concept of "penis," and because I'm straight the various differences don't intrigue me enough to be that interested.
In my profile, I mention that I'm "1% Gay". Here's as far as my gayness goes: I'm proud to know that other beings also share in the basic concept of having and understanding "penis." Overall, though, I think they're pretty ugly.
In my profile, I mention that I'm "1% Gay". Here's as far as my gayness goes: I'm proud to know that other beings also share in the basic concept of having and understanding "penis." Overall, though, I think they're pretty ugly.
hypolimnas
Superior Member
Chrysalis
Experimental Member
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2006
- Posts
- 447
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 4
- Points
- 161
- Location
- Rocky Mountain Region
- Sexuality
- 90% Straight, 10% Gay
- Gender
- Female
Interesting. I think they're some of the most awesome and beautiful things in the world.
Guess that's the difference between our sexual orientations.... :why:
That's just what I needed to see before bedtime. Thanks... NOT!
I think they're beautiful and yet extremely ugly. I suppose the "beauty" I see in them relates to what they represent: the experience of being a man. The "extreme ugliness" I see in them is on a purely aesthetic level. In and of themselves, I think they're ugly. Lately, I've been noticing that a lot of them look like thumbs, and in my gallery my last photo, of my erection, it looks a bit like a snail. Very gross.
Interesting. I think they're some of the most awesome and beautiful things in the world.
Good start but in a rigorous fashion you either have to come up with a mathematical proof or in lieu of that find and photograph every cock on the planet, your mission should you decide to accept it. <cue 70's mission impossible theme>:biggrin1:
"Seen one seen em all" is simply a literalism. Not all people are interested in penises; those that are may come to LPSG for various reasons. Variety and attitude is interesting (one reason I am here) but waxing lyrical about some celebrity's dick just strikes me as so funny.
After workout, there are five or six guys under the showers, as many drying off, and I always think that there is no part of the body as different as their cocks. You can see differences in hands, feet, chests, all parts of the body, but cocks are so different they hardly seem to belong to the same species.
AlteredEgo
Mythical Member
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2006
- Posts
- 19,175
- Media
- 37
- Likes
- 26,255
- Points
- 368
- Location
- Hello (Sud-Ouest, Burkina Faso)
- Sexuality
- No Response
They're all the same to me. It's not so much that they look alike, it's more that I just don't care. Caring about the man is the only thing to make one stand out for me at this point.
Ok, Chrysalis...now it's my turn to say... I think I luv YOU! You are sooooo right. Every cock is indeed different it's appearance, sensitivity, performance characteristics (I love sports cars, by the way). The more apt way to look at it is, 'if you've seen one cock...you WANT to see 'em all!'I think the statement "seen one, seen 'em all" is mostly used by people who don't want to see cock -- some straight men and some sexually repressed women.
It is one of the most ridiculous statements I've ever heard. I've encountered quite a variety in real life, and they not only come in all shapes and sizes, but they also have unique sensitivity patterns and performance characteristics (now I sound like I'm rating automobiles).
One has only to browse the galleries on this site to thoroughly disprove the statement.
The only thing the same about all cocks is that they are all...cocks. :biggrin1:
BigA
Experimental Member
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2006
- Posts
- 821
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 9
- Points
- 163
- Age
- 42
- Location
- you won't find me
- Sexuality
- 99% Straight, 1% Gay
- Gender
- Male
I agree completely. Of course they aren't all identical. But for most of us straight men, the differences aren't that interesting because we aren't that interested in the body part itself. We could probably say that all elbows are unique, and I'm sure they are. But I'm not interested enough in elbows to take the time to notice the differences. I suppose to the straight man this is all that matters about the penis: if it does the "job" its supposed to do. Women and gay men are probably more likely to get caught up on the "looks" of it all.
Lordpendragon
Experimental Member
This attitude is for morons.
I daydream of the many and wonderfully different vaginas/vulvas I have had the pleasure to know over the years.
I daydream of the many and wonderfully different vaginas/vulvas I have had the pleasure to know over the years.
