Separating the content questions?

Status
Not open for further replies.

hud01

Expert Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2009
Posts
4,983
Media
0
Likes
104
Points
133
Location
new york city
Sexuality
80% Straight, 20% Gay
Gender
Male
Dude, your funny but it doesn't make any sense at all what you're writing.
First of all he can't go past the "gay" threads because 90% of the time the title doesn't say "gay". While I have no problem with opening such links, some may have. Doesn't make them a homophobe though.
Next thing is you compare small niches to gay erotic? You know how offending that may sound to gay people?
And as mentioned above no one cares about reading thread titles that contain stuff you don't like. The problem was stupid thread titles that didn't give any hint what you'll find clicking that link.
Now the question is why do YOU complain? The separation in 2 subforums is no big deal. But you make a mountain out of a molehill.
Actually some could say that crying for a separated forum was making a mountain out of a mole hill, but what is done is done and it is time to move on. All I ask for now is btter clarification on what goes where.
 

Snakebyte

Superior Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2005
Posts
9,971
Media
0
Likes
6,702
Points
708
Actually some could say that crying for a separated forum was making a mountain out of a mole hill, but what is done is done and it is time to move on. All I ask for now is btter clarification on what goes where.

Well there is a difference between complaining about having two forums instead of one and complaining about being exposed to something you don't want to see.

In my opinion we should get rid of this adult section anyway since this is no porn forum.

@Mithra
found one after only 10 seconds: http://www.lpsg.org/169087-first-time-i-seen-done.html

I'm just going to extremes to make a point. As others have pointed out there are plenty of "iffy" categories out there; girl-on-girl porn, someone mentioned, is that "gay" or "straight"? how about bi porn? How about big-small comparison thread? There are picture in there with just guys and guys and girls. Where does that go?

And that's a pretty senseless discussion. I don't think anyone has a problem with seeing dicks or naked guys in general. Some just don't want to see two men having sex or sexual actions.
Straight guys want to see girls. Go find one who is mad about seeing lesbians.
 
Last edited:

Mithra

Experimental Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2007
Posts
320
Media
0
Likes
2
Points
163
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male

First of all you didn't "find" that after 10 seconds. You posted IN that thread 22 hours ago, so you knew all about it. But more importantly; how does a thread titled "first time I seen that done" which leads to a dude beating himself up with his balls, trick a straight guy into watching gay porn?

You click on thread named "first time I seen that done," and follow the video. The thread delivers. Like the OP, you never "seen that done before" either. You don't bitch to the mods because you saw a dude beating himself up with his balls and you consider that "gay" and you consider yourself "straight." And you sure as hell don't bitch "wrong forum." You are on a site, voluntarily, dedicated to supporting large penises for fucking christ.

You know what? I never clicked on that thread until you pointed it out, because "First time I seen that done" means to me some freaky assed shit I most likely am not into. I move on to "Hot Porn Stars Having Orgasms on Big Dicks." or whatever. And just like "First time I seen that done" delivers crazy assed shit I never seen done before," "Hot Porn Stars Having Orgasms on Big Dicks." delivers hot porn stars having sex.

You made my point for me, bro.
 
Last edited:

Mithra

Experimental Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2007
Posts
320
Media
0
Likes
2
Points
163
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
And that's a pretty senseless discussion. I don't think anyone has a problem with seeing dicks or naked guys in general. Some just don't want to see two men having sex or sexual actions.
Straight guys want to see girls. Go find one who is mad about seeing lesbians.

Again, show me a thread that conveys the idea that there is straight content and instead the visitor is sent to gay content. "first time i seen done" doesn't suggest gay or straight content. It suggest freaky assed content.

Just like the title suggests, anyone who clicks on that thread is going to see freaky assed shit they haven't seen before. If they aren't into freaky assed shit they shouldn't click on the thread. If they are into freaky assed shit, but are worried that said freaky assed shit has to be straight (or gay) or they will be uncomfortable, they shouldn't have followed the link in that thread.

Otherwise they are an idiot and shouldn't be making rules for the site that affect the usability of the rest of us -- who are smart enough to only click on threads that interest us.
 

Mithra

Experimental Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2007
Posts
320
Media
0
Likes
2
Points
163
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
Straight guys want to see girls. Go find one who is mad about seeing lesbians.

How about an actual lesbian looking for porn here? Does she go to the "straight" section or the "gay" section? She is gay but she has to go to the "straight" section because "Straight guys want to see girls." Man, your argument sucks so hard. Take an introduction to logic course at the philosophy department of a local community college.
 

vlls

Expert Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Posts
240
Media
15
Likes
135
Points
213
Location
Victoria, BC
Verification
View
Sexuality
80% Straight, 20% Gay
Gender
Male
the separation is lame.... i thought this forum was part of getting over such societal taboos.... and now its harder to find the amateur stuff also!
 

Snakebyte

Superior Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2005
Posts
9,971
Media
0
Likes
6,702
Points
708
First of all you didn't "find" that after 10 seconds. You posted IN that thread 22 hours ago, so you knew all about it. But more importantly; how does a thread titled "first time I seen that done" which leads to a dude beating himself up with his balls, trick a straight guy into watching gay porn?

I may have posted in this thread, still I went through the thread titles and found it in 10 seconds. Want to call me a liar? Go on.
It's not about tricking anyone into anything. That would mean the thread starter did it on purpose.
Why can't you just get over it that some people just don't want to see gay sex? Just like some gay guys just don't want to see straight sex. And don't tell me that's wrong since a friend of mine told me he almost threw up when he encountered a pussy.
Just respect the fact that some people are not comfortable with it.
Anyway, I'm tired of discussing this. Opinions are like arseholes. Everyone got one.

Just one thing to add:
A lesbian on a large penis support group. now tell me why that sounds pretty funny to me.

And just for the record. If you think your argument is logical and mine's not. I don't care. I won podium discussions at university but I won't invest so much effort into just some guy on the internet.
At least I am able to put my words in one single post. ;)

Otherwise they are an idiot and shouldn't be making rules for the site that affect the usability of the rest of us -- who are smart enough to only click on threads that interest us.
Actually calling people homophobes and idiots makes you look like the idiot. And you complain about having to read two subforums. That's pathetic.

over and out
 
Last edited:

Mithra

Experimental Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2007
Posts
320
Media
0
Likes
2
Points
163
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
That's cool. Just want to point out you have failed to provide one example of a thread that someone looking for straight porn might mistakenly click on and find gay porn, even though you say those threads are very prevalent and the basis for these silly compartments.

Over and out also.
 

B_abc

Experimental Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2006
Posts
744
Media
0
Likes
8
Points
161
Sexuality
90% Straight, 10% Gay
Gender
Male
This separation of content is ridiculous. It's like many people said, if you don't want to see something, dont open it. There's no need to hide it.
 

tmny

1st Like
Joined
Oct 12, 2005
Posts
171
Media
0
Likes
1
Points
161
Location
earth
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
That's cool. Just want to point out you have failed to provide one example of a thread that someone looking for straight porn might mistakenly click on and find gay porn, even though you say those threads are very prevalent and the basis for these silly compartments.

Over and out also.

Haha, if you think that doesn't happen, you need to pay closer attention. Plus, it's going to be harder to find examples now that the problem has been fixed.

There have been NUMEROUS occasions where I am looking for some straight porn while maintaining a raging hard-on, only to completely lose it after clicking on a very ambiguous thread title with an ambiguous link title (Usually titled something like "CHECK THIS OUT! AMAZING ASS!" ) only stumble upon some dude fucking another dude's ass.

Sorry, but for a lot of guys, that's a boner killer. Opening up a second tab shouldn't inconvenience you at all, I do that all the time when browsing porn.
 
Last edited:

Mithra

Experimental Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2007
Posts
320
Media
0
Likes
2
Points
163
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
Haha, if you think that doesn't happen, you need to pay closer attention. Plus, it's going to be harder to find examples now that the problem has been fixed.

There have been NUMEROUS occasions where I am looking for some straight porn while maintaining a raging hard-on, only to completely lose it after clicking on a very ambiguous thread title with an ambiguous link title (Usually titled something like "CHECK THIS OUT! AMAZING ASS!" ) only stumble upon some dude fucking another dude's ass.

Sorry, but for a lot of guys, that's a boner killer. Opening up a second tab shouldn't inconvenience you at all, I do that all the time when browsing porn.

(Alright I'm not done with this thread yet.) For the sake of the discussion can you show me a thread or two that traumatized your boner with an ambiguous title? Like I said I go for straight porn also and have been coming to this site for a while and have never once clicked on something where the title mislead me. I guess I'm sorry that I said it would take an idiot to do that (as snakebite called me out on), but I also kinda feel like I'm just saying it like it is. I never called anyone a homophobe.
 

flame boy

Account Disabled
Joined
Feb 4, 2008
Posts
3,189
Media
0
Likes
188
Points
123
Sexuality
No Response
As previously mentioned we're in the process of moving a lot of threads from one forum to the other, if you find content which should be moved please feel free to send me a PM or leave me a message on my wall.
 

7x6

Sexy Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2006
Posts
612
Media
0
Likes
52
Points
248
Gender
Male
The separation is just wrong. This is a site about big cocks. Some of us are gay, some of us (like me) are straight but fascinated. I can't imagine why anyone would even be here just for the straight porn links. Sure, the "huge natural tits" or whatever threads are some of the best here but they are kind of secondary to the site.

I have to say, I tend to click off most of the gay videos because they don't do anything for me. That said, I will stick around and watch if one of the guys is particularly huge because fascination with huge cocks is why I'm here.

I think being on this site and objecting enough to demand the separation is just weird. I, and probably others, are unlikely to browse the gay forum so the site has got a whole lot less interesting to me.

I suspect there are also a fair number of size obsessed gay guys who don't mind seeing the occasional pussy if it has an enormous cock sliding in or out of it but are unlikely to browse the straight forum.

I think this should have been put to a vote. I imagine that more people will be pissed off with the segregation than pleased by it. It's just that this majority didn't say anything until now because it didn't need to!
 

D_Tim McGnaw

Account Disabled
Joined
Aug 30, 2009
Posts
5,420
Media
0
Likes
110
Points
133
The separation is just wrong. This is a site about big cocks. Some of us are gay, some of us (like me) are straight but fascinated. I can't imagine why anyone would even be here just for the straight porn links. Sure, the "huge natural tits" or whatever threads are some of the best here but they are kind of secondary to the site.

I have to say, I tend to click off most of the gay videos because they don't do anything for me. That said, I will stick around and watch if one of the guys is particularly huge because fascination with huge cocks is why I'm here.

I think being on this site and objecting enough to demand the separation is just weird. I, and probably others, are unlikely to browse the gay forum so the site has got a whole lot less interesting to me.

I suspect there are also a fair number of size obsessed gay guys who don't mind seeing the occasional pussy if it has an enormous cock sliding in or out of it but are unlikely to browse the straight forum.

I think this should have been put to a vote. I imagine that more people will be pissed off with the segregation than pleased by it. It's just that this majority didn't say anything until now because it didn't need to!




I'm Gay, and in my sex life I only really enjoy sex with men, but for the purposes of fantasy and pure enjoyment I get off on a wide variety of porn, I've always enjoyed heterosexual porn as well as gay porn and there's all kinds of other stuff that I find hot. I'm pretty certain I'm not the only one like this.


Now I have to search three separate sub-forums? Open three separate tabs just to search what has otherwise been a really handy and really useful resource for hot porn ?

And why? Because A) some people can't be bothered to ignore stuff they don't like, and B) people are so horrified by things they're not into they seem to find it psycho-sexually scarifying ?

Hysterical overreactions to porn of a different colour, so to speak, really do seem to have been pandered to here, and though I do not say that all of those who've lobbied for this change are homophobes I'd lay good money on a sizable chunk of them being so.
 

Biltmore

Admired Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2009
Posts
129
Media
0
Likes
796
Points
363
Location
San Juan de Terranova (Canada)
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Oh shut up. Gay sex is not appealing to straight people, in fact it is rather the most un-erotic thing I can think of.Lately when I come here to find good beat off material of a girl enjoying and getting off on a big dick I have to scan pass several gay themed threads which by title alone weaken my state of arousal. Imagine having to read descriptions of several types of vomit in a menu before ordering your food. Bi people can browse both sub forums. The separation is a good thing if you really know yourself. If you think that your sexual inclinations need to be forced upon others than you are the intolerant one. Overall more sub forums will better suite individual taste.
 
Last edited:

kansan

Experimental Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2008
Posts
135
Media
0
Likes
17
Points
238
Hud, homophobes fear gays, people who find gay sex distasteful are not homophobes. Just as many 100% gay people find the thought of straight sex distasteful, 100% straight people are entitled to their opinions. Not everyone is a homphobe if they disagree with gay lifestyles or gay porn. It is just not for them.

I don't have any desire to see gay porn. I don't think that makes me a homophobe.

I am glad the change was made.

Some threads and posts were intentionally or unintentionally ambiguously labeled. I hated wasting time clicking into a gay video.
 

Mithra

Experimental Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2007
Posts
320
Media
0
Likes
2
Points
163
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
I'm Gay, and in my sex life I only really enjoy sex with men, but for the purposes of fantasy and pure enjoyment I get off on a wide variety of porn, I've always enjoyed heterosexual porn as well as gay porn and there's all kinds of other stuff that I find hot. I'm pretty certain I'm not the only one like this.


Now I have to search three separate sub-forums? Open three separate tabs just to search what has otherwise been a really handy and really useful resource for hot porn ?

And why? Because A) some people can't be bothered to ignore stuff they don't like, and B) people are so horrified by things they're not into they seem to find it psycho-sexually scarifying ?

Hysterical overreactions to porn of a different colour, so to speak, really do seem to have been pandered to here, and though I do not say that all of those who've lobbied for this change are homophobes I'd lay good money on a sizable chunk of them being so.

Exactly. This change makes this site less interesting and valuable to me. No one has been able to show one single thread where the content is remotely misleading. Oh well. Just another site I will visit less.
 

quintessence

Just Browsing
Joined
Oct 11, 2006
Posts
62
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
151
Gender
Male
I'm not a fan of the separation.

It's dissapointing to see this happen to a fourm I frequent because it combines everything in one place.

What is more dissapointing is that the Moderators caved to convention.

This is LSPG, this is about as liberal as you get on the internet. Seriously, if people can't deal with 5 seconds of gay porn before closing the link then I suggest they go find one of the 1 billion specifically straight porn sites (I highly recommend pornbb).

The Adult Website forum has been unsorted for many many years, and it has consistently been one of the most popular on the site.

Why change it? - I want the Moderators to give me a good reason other then to respect the wishes of people who do not wish to view content they are uncomfortable with.

As far as I'm concerned that is not a valid reason.

Adult Websites was unsorted when they signed up to LSPG.

They knew full well they might see a man having sex with another man, but they still stuck around.

Seperating the forum is not the solution for this site. Not when there are other options like;

- Compulsory tagging of thread content

- Popular thread sub-forum.

- A policy to have un-ambiguous thread titles.

I am really starting to feel sorry for not making more of a case before in Flashy's original thread to not have this happen.

I honestly thought the Moderators wouldn't go through with this. Damn it.

Q.
 

bustedm

Cherished Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2007
Posts
503
Media
0
Likes
379
Points
283
Oh shut up. Gay sex is not appealing to straight people, in fact it is rather the most un-erotic thing I can think of.Lately when I come here to find good beat off material of a girl enjoying and getting off on a big dick I have to scan pass several gay themed threads which by title alone weaken my state of arousal. Imagine having to read descriptions of several types of vomit in a menu before ordering your food. Bi people can browse both sub forums. The separation is a good thing if you really know yourself. If you think that your sexual inclinations need to be forced upon others than you are the intolerant one. Overall more sub forums will better suite individual taste.

I agree with you 100%. When I'm browsing around for big penises to admire, the last thing I want to do is see all that gay stuff. Can't a straight guy like myself salivate at the thought of fat swinging dicks without the homos getting all in my business?
 

D_Tim McGnaw

Account Disabled
Joined
Aug 30, 2009
Posts
5,420
Media
0
Likes
110
Points
133
Oh shut up. Gay sex is not appealing to straight people, in fact it is rather the most un-erotic thing I can think of.Lately when I come here to find good beat off material of a girl enjoying and getting off on a big dick I have to scan pass several gay themed threads which by title alone weaken my state of arousal. Imagine having to read descriptions of several types of vomit in a menu before ordering your food. Bi people can browse both sub forums. The separation is a good thing if you really know yourself. If you think that your sexual inclinations need to be forced upon others than you are the intolerant one. Overall more sub forums will better suite individual taste.


The fact that you tell me to shut up and compare what other people do to get off to vomit (vomit no one forces you to actually look at btw) speaks volumes about you.


Is this unpleasant, bigoted troll the kind of person the Moderators wanted to satisfy when they made this decision?


Oh and where do Selfsuck, and Solo scenes fit in this new scheme ?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.