Separating the content questions?

[SilverTrain]

I agree with you 100%. When I'm browsing around for big penises to admire, the last thing I want to do is see all that gay stuff. Can't a straight guy like myself salivate at the thought of fat swinging dicks without the homos getting all in my business?

LOL - Brilliant!

 

[hud01]

I agree with you 100%. When I'm browsing around for big penises to admire, the last thing I want to do is see all that gay stuff. Can't a straight guy like myself salivate at the thought of fat swinging dicks without the homos getting all in my business?

LOL - Brilliant!

Agreed. One of the best posts.

 

[B_abc]

LETS PUT THIS TO A FUCKING VOTE ALREADY. isn't that the fair thing to do? So that everyone can have a say on this ??

 

[Mithra]

I agree with you 100%. When I'm browsing around for big penises to admire, the last thing I want to do is see all that gay stuff. Can't a straight guy like myself salivate at the thought of fat swinging dicks without the homos getting all in my business?

LOL

 

[Biltmore]

I agree with you 100%. When I'm browsing around for big penises to admire, the last thing I want to do is see all that gay stuff. Can't a straight guy like myself salivate at the thought of fat swinging dicks without the homos getting all in my business?

A sarcastic and clever retort, but your core argument is weak (your argument=there are no straight people on LPSG)

Here are the primary arguments against subforums:

(silly argument 1)"Now I have to search three separate sub-forums? Open three separate tabs.. "

Aww... poor baby

(silly argument 2)"Hysterical overreactions to porn of a different colour, so to speak, really do seem to have been pandered to here"

So separating content is a "hysterical overreaction" to you? Man what are all these hysterical Newspaper editors thinking. Who needs a sports, international, and a business section? You would apparently prefer to take all that shit unsorted.

(The real argument)-- Straight people should not be bothered since they don't have to click on the link.

But the problem is that the thread titles alone are often descriptive enough to be disgusting to straight people:

examples taken from the gay subforum:

Straight man fucking guy in hotel room
1 scene, 2 hot dudes, 5 hand-free cumshots
Vids where HE can't take it

 

[hud01]

A sarcastic and clever retort, but your core argument is weak (your argument=there are no straight people on LPSG)

Here are the primary arguments against subforums:

(silly argument 1)"Now I have to search three separate sub-forums? Open three separate tabs.. "

Aww... poor baby

(silly argument 2)"Hysterical overreactions to porn of a different colour, so to speak, really do seem to have been pandered to here"

So separating content is a "hysterical overreaction" to you? Man what are all these hysterical Newspaper editors thinking. Who needs a sports, international, and a business section? You would apparently prefer to take all that shit unsorted.

(The real argument)-- Straight people should not be bothered since they don't have to click on the link.

But the problem is that the thread titles alone are often descriptive enough to be disgusting to straight people:

examples taken from the gay subforum:

I had stopped posting and adding to it. You were kind enough to post in such a way that I had to come back.

Your sports analogy is flawed. The comparison would be having separate sections for football, baseball, hockey, cricket, rugby, tennis, etc.

Here is the rub.

(The real argument)-- Straight people should not be bothered since they don't have to click on the link.

I was chastised for saying the people who wanted separate sections were homophobic. You just proved my point. If you took a poll, I am guessing that 90% of the people who wanted the change are listed as straight.

You say aww poor baby for having to look at three different forums, but you think that having a straight man have to click on a post, or even to see a title about gay sex, is horrific. What an ass you are.

Edit: In almost 11 months you have posted 11 times. You have not contributed to this site at all. When you start to do so, then come back, otherwise bugger off.

 

[kansan]

Exactly. This change makes this site less interesting and valuable to me. No one has been able to show one single thread where the content is remotely misleading. Oh well. Just another site I will visit less.

Here are the TOP 10 topics on the Gay section right now.

I don't know who "Corbin Fischer" or "Preston" is. I didn't previously know what a "bottom" was. There is only one unabiguously gay title here. Out of 10.

I came here wanting to see women getting fucked by big dicks, as I like to fantasize that it it is me with the big dick fucking the woman. So having "big dick" or something like that in the title does not make it a gay thread.

Dload links for Corbin Fisher Vids...
Anyone knows this bottom? so cute...
Big/Small Comparison Thread?
Preston who?
holy fuck...
Name this pornstar
Flopping Cock While Riding
First time I seen that done!
Straight man fucking guy in hotel room
enormous ones!

 

[D_Tim McGnaw]

(silly argument 1)"Now I have to search three separate sub-forums? Open three separate tabs.. "

Aww... poor baby

You're patronising me for complaining about having to open tabs, but you're defending your own whining about having to ignore threads you're not interested in? Get some perspective.

(silly argument 2)"Hysterical overreactions to porn of a different colour, so to speak, really do seem to have been pandered to here"

So separating content is a "hysterical overreaction" to you? Man what are all these hysterical Newspaper editors thinking. Who needs a sports, international, and a business section? You would apparently prefer to take all that shit unsorted.

That's a false comparison, we're not talking about current affairs, as packaged in a newspaper. We're talking about porn, and in any case the ability exists to be your own editor, and in this case dividing the content out in this fashion actually makes it harder to find what you may be looking for, not easier, especially since a lot of the content does not fit in to neat little headings.

(The real argument)-- Straight people should not be bothered since they don't have to click on the link.

But the problem is that the thread titles alone are often descriptive enough to be disgusting to straight people:

examples taken from the gay subforum:

I'm sorry but anyone who is "disgusted" by a few words, enough to justify a sexual apartheid on a site which until now had averred such an outcome is being utterly hysterical and frankly what you're talking about is the basic definition of Homophobia. Be mindful that I would be just as disappointed by gay members claiming to be disgusted by thread titles describing straight sex, and would happily describe their disgust as "Hetero-phobic".

In any case are you seriously trying to tell me that your disgust at thread titles (made intentionally graphic to prevent straight people from accidentally clicking on things they don't enjoy looking at mind you) is so extreme that you think completely arbitrary and discriminatory vilayets of porn should be created to avoid it?

One of the most attractive things about this site is that it is in fact supportive of the broad spectrum of it member's sexual interests and quirks, and that member's feel free to discuss an enormous range of topics about a huge range of sexual activities.

If you're saying that thread titles descriptive of gay sex disgust you this intensely are you also in favour of all the other sub-forums in which sex is discussed being segregated too? Or perhaps you would just prefer gay members took their disgusting sex somewhere else all together?

 

[B_abc]

A sarcastic and clever retort, but your core argument is weak (your argument=there are no straight people on LPSG)

Here are the primary arguments against subforums:

(silly argument 1)"Now I have to search three separate sub-forums? Open three separate tabs.. "

Aww... poor baby


(silly argument 2)"Hysterical overreactions to porn of a different colour, so to speak, really do seem to have been pandered to here"

So separating content is a "hysterical overreaction" to you? Man what are all these hysterical Newspaper editors thinking. Who needs a sports, international, and a business section? You would apparently prefer to take all that shit unsorted.

(The real argument)-- Straight people should not be bothered since they don't have to click on the link.

But the problem is that the thread titles alone are often descriptive enough to be disgusting to straight people:

examples taken from the gay subforum:

I don't get why you're so worried. You have less then 20 posts on lpsg, so your clearly not an avid user of the site, or at least you don't participate. I bet you're one of those leechers who come here just seeking for videos. So just cuz you are a homophobe, do we all have to endure the content being separated? Go find you porn elsewhere. There are tons of sites.
Now get the fuck off you prick.

 

[Mithra]

yup, in summation: this separation thing panders to homophobes and makes this site less easy to navigate for the rest of us. don't fucking click on shit you don't want to look at. end of story.

 

[Mithra]

Moderators... Could there also be a separate BBW section? I'm straight, but I don't like seeing videos of overweight girls and I recently clicked on a link which led to a video like this. My boner is traumatized. Please make a new category to protect my delicate sensibilities. thanks.

 

[Flashy]

That's cool. Just want to point out you have failed to provide one example of a thread that someone looking for straight porn might mistakenly click on and find gay porn, even though you say those threads are very prevalent and the basis for these silly compartments.

Over and out also.

well there are plenty of cases...someone thinking this was a solo, or possibly straight sex scene thread looking at this, would be fooled by an unlabeled and ambiguous post, no? once click

http://www.lpsg.org/166840-a-gigantic-one.html

---

or how about this, relatively ambiguous solo/question/size issue yet takes you directly to a gay sex content site? one click

http://www.lpsg.org/166630-would-you-say-he-was.html

---

or what about straight members who do not speak english well, and might not be as wary as straight english speaking members and migh not understand what "hazehim" means? One click.

http://www.lpsg.org/165589-hazehim-com.html

-----

or this one...one click to the gay themed portion of a tube site

http://www.lpsg.org/165421-words-cant-even-describe.html

-----

or what about this? Ambiguous name, talks about rimming, no indication straight or gay, one click to the preview pic, voila, gay sex...I did not click but i did a google search of "Levi Poulter" and it indicated he was a gay porn star...but what about someone not as resourceful as I who just clicked on it?

http://www.lpsg.org/163922-levi-poulter-rimming.html

---

or how about this seemingly simple ID request...one click through to the video

http://www.lpsg.org/159715-does-anyone-know-who-this.html

---

and this one, where someone in the thread actually mentioned they were upset and asked that the person label his videos?

http://www.lpsg.org/155947-bait-bus-huge-cock-going.html

---

That is 6 threads out of the last 19 pages of the "straight" forum that are still there, not even counting the ones that have been moved to the "gay" forum.

I think it is more than fair that the separation has occurred and it does not impinge upon anyone's ability to see the content they choose, without having to worry about being exposed to something they do not wish to see.

 

[Flashy]

yup, in summation: this separation thing panders to homophobes and makes this site less easy to navigate for the rest of us. don't fucking click on shit you don't want to look at. end of story.

oh please...this has nothing to do with the hysteria and nastiness of homophobia.

homophobes are the type of people that believe gays are different, debased, deviants, do not deserve equal treatment under the law, are afraid to be near gay people, do not believe gays should be able to marry, believe homosexuality is not bioligical, believe homosexuals can be cured by religion, believe gays should not be serving their country with honor, or adopting and being good parents to children...

there is a difference between that, and tolerant straight people who merely do not wish to see two gay men sucking each others cocks.

as for the site being "less easy to navigate" who are you, Magellan, who if you veer off course near Tiera Del Fuego you could wind up in the antarctic? You do not have to negotiate the Cape of Good Hope in winter for chrissakes...you have to click on the gay forum instead of the straight forum.

*DEAL WITH IT*

 

[tmny]

I don't have any desire to see gay porn. I don't think that makes me a homophobe.

I am glad the change was made.

Some threads and posts were intentionally or unintentionally ambiguously labeled. I hated wasting time clicking into a gay video.

could not have said it any better myself

 

[Mithra]

there is a difference between that, and tolerant straight people who merely do not wish to see two gay men sucking each others cocks.

I am such a person. The difference is rather than demand the moderators protect me from porn I'm not interested in, I simply don't click on it. If I do accidently click on something I don't want to see. I stop looking at it. Much easier than having to go to three or more places to look for what I'm looking for if, its not "big titted porn star sucking some guys huge cock." But then I'm not a homophobe, so I can imagine how traumatizing it might be for someone who is to accidently see two guys sucking each other off.

as for the site being "less easy to navigate" who are you, Magellan, who if you veer off course near Tiera Del Fuego you could wind up in the antarctic? You do not have to negotiate the Cape of Good Hope in winter for chrissakes...you have to click on the gay forum instead of the straight forum.

*DEAL WITH IT*

Yup. I guess I will deal with it. Since this lame, illogical, downright stupid decision has been made, I'll deal with probably missing threads I might have been interested in because someone decided they were "gay." Greater injustices have been suffered of course. Strike one for the homophobes surfing the "LARGE PENIS SUPPORT GROUP" LOL.

 

[Flashy]

well there are plenty of cases...someone thinking this was a solo, or possibly straight sex scene thread looking at this, would be fooled by an unlabeled and ambiguous post, no? once click

CONTINUED Examples

Ambiguous, no?

http://www.lpsg.org/156721-gargantuan-black-dick-sucked.html

----

or this? Ambiguous, one click to gay porn site

http://www.lpsg.org/156593-what-old-fat-guys-did.html

---

or what about this? What if someone does not know what a ladyboy is? Perhaps some of our less phrased in english posters see "lady" or "ladyboy" (and assume there is aa lady or a lady and a boy in the video) and bingo...one click.

http://www.lpsg.org/156308-good-cumshot.html

---



though some of the posters here have tried to portray this as a not very common occurrence, it is, in fact all too common...and this is without even looking at the hundreds of threads that are now in the gay forum which used to be comingled in the old AW forum....

there are *PLENTY* of examples to be found, and they are *EXACTLY* the reason for the necessity of the separation.

 

[Flashy]

I am such a person. The difference is rather than demand the moderators protect me from porn I'm not interested in, I simply don't click on it. If I do accidently click on something I don't want to see. I stop looking at it. Much easier than having to go to three or more places to look for what I'm looking for if, its not "big titted porn star sucking some guys huge cock." But then I'm not a homophobe, so I can imagine how traumatizing it might be for someone who is to accidently see two guys sucking each other off.



Yup. I guess I will deal with it. Since this lame, illogical, downright stupid decision has been made, I'll deal with probably missing threads I might have been interested in because someone decided they were "gay." Greater injustices have been suffered of course. Strike one for the homophobes surfing the "LARGE PENIS SUPPORT GROUP" LOL.

of course, you managed to ignore all the examples i provided which you claimed did not in fact exist.

and regardless of one's "homophobia" level, according to you, you may feel entirely more comfortable seeing gay sex than others.

So, i will say it again...and get it through your head...supporting gays in every other possible way politically and socially, but *NOT* wanting to see two guys sucking each others cocks, does *NOT* make you a homophobe.


There is nothing "lame and illiogical" about having a separate gay and straight forum for sexual videos, websites and pictures. in fact, it is *TOTALLY* logical.

and how exactly will you "miss the threads" when you know *EXACTLY* where they will be? They are not being erased, they are not taken off the forum. Stop being so dramatic.

"Greater injustices have been suffered of course"? Not that we would know it from your whining about having to click into the gay forum instead of the straight forum...who knows, you *MIGHT* even have to click on a Bookmark to get to LPSG when you open your browser!

Don't use your laziness as an excuse to okay making others uncomfortable with content that might be upsetting.

Go in to the Women's Issues forum, and bring up Men's issues...see how long it takes before a couple of women ask "how is this a women's issue"?

the same reason women have a separate forum here, is the same reason there should be gay and straight sex/video forums...so people can be *COMFORTABLE* on this website and choose where they spend much of their time here.

and, having a large penis on the LPSG, is not a gay/straight issue either...though nice try.

because why else would we have forums for games, politics and other issues, if it were *ONLY* for one thing?

But keep up with the drama...it is really amusing watching you stomp your feet over a semblance of organization and consideration in the adult websites forum, which, if you had not noticed over the past year, had become a complete mess.

 

[hud01]

CONTINUED Examples

Ambiguous, no?

http://www.lpsg.org/156721-gargantuan-black-dick-sucked.html

----

or this? Ambiguous, one click to gay porn site

http://www.lpsg.org/156593-what-old-fat-guys-did.html

---

or what about this? What if someone does not know what a ladyboy is? Perhaps some of our less phrased in english posters see "lady" or "ladyboy" (and assume there is aa lady or a lady and a boy in the video) and bingo...one click.

http://www.lpsg.org/156308-good-cumshot.html

---



though some of the posters here have tried to portray this as a not very common occurrence, it is, in fact all too common...and this is without even looking at the hundreds of threads that are now in the gay forum which used to be comingled in the old AW forum....

there are *PLENTY* of examples to be found, and they are *EXACTLY* the reason for the necessity of the separation.

Then you are clueless. I have clicked on many threads and I don't think that there are more than ten where, before I actually opened the vid, that I did not know if it were straight or not. If you are protesting that you open a thread and you are upset that it is not straight, then I really don't give a flying fuck.

 

[Flashy]

Then you are clueless. I have clicked on many threads and I don't think that there are more than ten where, before I actually opened the vid, that I did not know if it were straight or not. If you are protesting that you open a thread and you are upset that it is not straight, then I really don't give a flying fuck.

well i guess nobody is as smart as you are....and since you are so smart, you should have no trouble posting and viewing gay vids in the gay forum and straight vids in the straight forum.

and, if you cannot figure out, that out of all the threads you clicked on, and then you opened the video, and there were 10 instances where it turned out to be a gay video, what the problem with that is, then *I* really don't give a flying fuck. It has happened to me perhaps 10-20 times as well, and each time, it is very upsetting and nauseating, and 10-20 times more than i have ever wanted to see.
Considering i am a grownup, i can get over it, but that does not mean i wish to continue being subjected to it, but there may be people who would get even more upset by seeing it even 1 time...and it is not your right to tell people they have to be subjected to the roulette wheel of that just because some of you don't like having to click twice instead of once.

in the straight forum, even after the switch i have presented you already with 10 ambiguous threads, or one out of every 4 pages so far, by my count, where there is a strong possibility for misinterpretation...and if you look in the gay forum you can easily find hundreds of poorly labelled ones that used to be mixed in with the straight ones.

this is a forum where *EVERYONE* deserves the consideration of not playing roulette with what they are *COMFORTABLE* seeing sexually.

We are all adults here who agree to look at sexual content...but we also have the right to choose what type of content that is, and you do not have the right to say that it is a big pinata that you just have to take your chances with, gay, bi, straight or transgender.

period.

get used to it.

 

[Mithra]

If you are protesting that you open a thread and you are upset that it is not straight, then I really don't give a flying fuck.

Nor do I. But apparently the mods do.

We are on the Large Penis Support Group for christ sake. One of the cool things about this site was that it didn't matter if you were "straight" or "gay" or whatever. But now someone is deciding if this or that video is "straight" or "gay" and protecting us from accidentally clicking on something we might not want to see by putting it in the "proper" category. That makes this site a hell of a lot less interesting. But I don't pay anyone to come here, so I can't really complain. Whatever people think is best.