Sex Science: Estimating a Woman's Ideal Girth Capacity

massageguy39

Sexy Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2012
Posts
98
Media
25
Likes
82
Points
63
Age
51
Location
Georgia
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Have you ever wondered if women with more hour glass figures, larger hips, and bubbly butts naturally have an ability to accommodate larger than average girth than there less than shapely female counter parts?

Does anyone know of any metrics or studies that have examined this question? I'm curious.
 

BigStick4Pleasure

Legendary Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2010
Posts
95
Media
145
Likes
1,817
Points
168
Location
Southern California
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
I seriously doubt you'll find any such studies in official sex science, not yet anyway.

Anecdotal and subjective though it may be, I have known extremely petite women who can take hugely thick cocks, and taller ones with wide hips who seemed to have a little difficulty with it, though nothing too difficult as we are talking about a birth canal after all. A regular height woman I was with described how after me, sometimes she felt like her pelvic bones were popped out of place and they would suddenly fall back into place, startling her. I am not super thick, but girthy at 6" around.

A much more likely correlation is one between certain female body features and the ability to take DEPTH. But again, plenty of outliers I could mention.

It is funny that there are quite a few studies done on penis size, but not one done on a woman's vaginal depth during maximum arousal, or preferred thickness. There is the huge amount of material and arguments made at penissizedebate.com, if you want to sift through that. Even charts that try to nail down the ideal size in girth and length for most women. But nothing mentioned about features like wide hips, bubble butts and so on.
 

AlteredEgo

Mythical Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2006
Posts
19,176
Media
37
Likes
26,249
Points
368
Location
Hello (Sud-Ouest, Burkina Faso)
Sexuality
No Response
The idea that nothing is too difficult because a vagina is also a birth canal is hilariously stupid. Do you know how much change a woman's body goes through before it becomes a birth canal? And it is STILL not usually pleasurable! Unless you're planning on performing nine months engaged in non-stop foreplay while simultaneously drugging her with all the pregnancy hormones, you can't expect that a woman can insert things more easily just because under certain conditions her vagina may become a birth canal. Unless you're talking about a woman in labor, her vagina is NOT a birth canal. It's a sex hole.

And penissizedebate.com is a sham solely for selling enhancement products despite what its owner claims.
 

BigStick4Pleasure

Legendary Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2010
Posts
95
Media
145
Likes
1,817
Points
168
Location
Southern California
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
To respectfully attempt to refute my points would be one thing. To call them hilariously stupid is pathetic, prejudiced, and speaks volumes about you. Ahh, for the days of barbarism, where being polite was mandatory lest one had their skull sundered by an axe. Relax, not threatening anyone, just sharing Ron Howard's sentiments.

Why I should waste my time defending my comment from someone who clearly thinks himself so high and mighty, is lost on myself.

Making reference to a vagina as being part of the birth canal was intended only to bring attention to the extreme adaptability of the organ, nothing more. It is for this reason that even very petite women with relatively tight vaginas are able to eventually take hugely thick cocks the size of their own forearm, given lots of patience and know-how on the part of the penis owner. It is for this reason I have seen women go from having taken no more than 6" thick penetration, to a 7.5" or more thickness with no more than a few minutes of slow adjustment. THAT is all I was saying.

Regardless of the true motives of penissizedebate.com, you cannot dismiss everything on the entire site with one swooping statement of judgmental closed-mindedness. Most of the arguments made on that site stand up to the rigor of reason, unassailably so, much as you wish it weren't so. Much of those points I have also LIVED the reality of through the dozens of women I've been with and observed for myself the truth of it. You have a black and white mindset that a source is either 100% B.S. or 100% legit. I say, most sources of so-called authority are complete bullshit in an age where integrity is no longer valued, and the best you're ever going to get from even the most altruistic sources is maybe 90% truthfulness. That's what penissizedebate is. A collection of very fine points, with a few obvious tongue in cheek ones and possibly an ulterior overriding motive which nevertheless doesn't discount the minor premises presented therein.

You're welcome, derisive snap judgment name caller.
 

Sexycyn

Just Browsing
Joined
Mar 6, 2013
Posts
36
Media
5
Likes
0
Points
41
Location
London
Sexuality
90% Straight, 10% Gay
Gender
Female
Do you know how much change a woman's body goes through before it becomes a birth canal? And it is STILL not usually pleasurable! Unless you're planning on performing nine months engaged in non-stop foreplay while simultaneously drugging her with all the pregnancy hormones, you can't expect that a woman can insert things more easily just because under certain conditions her vagina may become a birth canal. Unless you're talking about a woman in labor, her vagina is NOT a birth canal. It's a sex hole.

Well said.
 

LaFemme

Mythical Member
Staff
Moderator
Verified
Gold
Platinum Gold
Joined
Aug 16, 2010
Posts
40,749
Media
2
Likes
38,870
Points
743
Location
Canada
Sexuality
90% Straight, 10% Gay
Gender
Female
I'm no doctor, I don't even play one on TV, but I do know a lot about the body and women's health. As far as I know, there is no correlation between what a person's body looks like on the outside and the size of their organs on the inside.

In fact, a woman with wide hips may have difficulty giving birth while a slender hipped woman has no problem at all. One can't tell by looking at the exterior of the body. That's why women have gynaecological exams - to see what's going on inside. It's why the medical profession uses x-rays, MRIs etc. if the organ is located inside the body, nothing on the outside is going give you the info you need (at least generally speaking).

I doubt you will find any studies on vagina depth or girth. It's not something women care about. Men may care, but you would need women to study.....

Bottom line: curvy girls won't necessarily be able to take a bigger dick.
 

WantToBeThick

Sexy Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2012
Posts
91
Media
3
Likes
69
Points
53
Location
Texas
Sexuality
80% Straight, 20% Gay
Gender
Male
I have a good friend who is an ob/gyn. I once asked her if there was any noticeable correlation between body size/shape/color and vaginal size. She said there was none.
 

Call_Me_Daddy

Sexy Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2013
Posts
750
Media
0
Likes
41
Points
53
Location
USA
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
When you say "ideal" I'm going to take that from the woman's perspective.

From what I've seen in quite a few female friends "toy" collections, I'm going with 5 inch circumference.
 

Tight_N_Juicy

Mythical Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Oct 14, 2012
Posts
18,265
Media
138
Likes
63,580
Points
508
Location
U.S.A.
Verification
View
Sexuality
Pansexual
Gender
Female
A woman's body shape doesn't have anything to do with how tight her Pussy is, or how big of a Dick she can handle.

You can't tell how big a man's Dick is by looking at his body type. Same thing with the ladies.

I don't have an 'hourglass' figure, or a bubble butt. Hell, my tits are tiny too.. and I can take a Thick Hard Cock like a champ in any of my holes.
 

Serial Kisser

Legendary Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2009
Posts
3,276
Media
6
Likes
1,568
Points
258
Location
South of Sanity
Sexuality
No Response
I'm no doctor, I don't even play one on TV, but I do know a lot about the body and women's health. As far as I know, there is no correlation between what a person's body looks like on the outside and the size of their organs on the inside.

In fact, a woman with wide hips may have difficulty giving birth while a slender hipped woman has no problem at all. One can't tell by looking at the exterior of the body. That's why women have gynaecological exams - to see what's going on inside. It's why the medical profession uses x-rays, MRIs etc. if the organ is located inside the body, nothing on the outside is going give you the info you need (at least generally speaking).

I doubt you will find any studies on vagina depth or girth. It's not something women care about. Men may care, but you would need women to study.....

Bottom line: curvy girls won't necessarily be able to take a bigger dick.

*slow clap*
 

TheRob

Legendary Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2007
Posts
5,673
Media
19
Likes
1,911
Points
333
Gender
Male
I sure hope they do
mostly cus hourglass shape is what I like so I am really wanting to push in when I get at one of those hotties
a skinny stick girl it's easier to remember you gotta be careful cus she'll break
so no idea, but I hope so!