both look good to me. I think I might go with # 2 tho based on looks alone.
I even think she was overall "curvier" than the first one... who, in spite of not being quite as skinny, had a body that was a little squareish.
square?
both look good to me. I think I might go with # 2 tho based on looks alone.
I even think she was overall "curvier" than the first one... who, in spite of not being quite as skinny, had a body that was a little squareish.
square?
Ok so let me get this straight so I don't get confused here because this is very important here
Lady #1
http://www.judgmentofparis.com/kk/kati02.jpg
or
Lady #2
http://static.flickr.com/53/128407933_76f85cfbd8_m.jpg
Just Pick ONE!
-I know I'm straight.... but in my opinion, the 1st girl is sexier. She's still very shapely. The 2nd girl has gaps in her shorts where they meet her thighs because there's no meat there! That looks gross to me... you can totally see her thigh bone meeting her hip area. And the whole fact that you can see her ribs is unattractive, too. I also just think the 1st girl has a prettier face.
My wife at 5' 3" and 105 pounds 32 years ago was lean and curvy in all the right places and totally delightful, she is still 5' 3" but at around 135# is more "curvaceous" and I think she is very sexy.
I would have to say my preference changes depending on the woman and situation.
Ok so let me get this straight so I don't get confused here because this is very important here
Lady #1
http://www.judgmentofparis.com/kk/kati02.jpg
or
Lady #2
http://static.flickr.com/53/128407933_76f85cfbd8_m.jpg
Just Pick ONE!
I know I'm straight.... but in my opinion, the 1st girl is sexier. She's still very shapely. The 2nd girl has gaps in her shorts where they meet her thighs because there's no meat there! That looks gross to me... you can totally see her thigh bone meeting her hip area. And the whole fact that you can see her ribs is unattractive, too. I also just think the 1st girl has a prettier face.
Lets see ... I have been called statuesque, amazon, red sonja (wtf?), etc. by various men over the years. What do those terms mean - who knows, I think it varies with the individual who uses the term. Common vernacular is strange and variable, so it best not read too much into it.
As long as I'm healthy, fit into my current jeans and my ass doesn't jiggle excessively, then I'm happy.
Just for reference - I am 5' 9.5" tall, US size 8/10, have a "bubble butt", small breasted (US 36B), small feet (US 7.5B), fit (long distance runner) and have no idea how much I weigh because I learned long ago not to obsess over it.
K
oops, almost forgot - as for men, I find all sorts of physical features/types sexy - only dislikes are very skinny, BIG bellies and "washboard abs".
K