i don't mind the sluts, the whores, the used, the abused.. in a consensual setting, where derogatory verbiage is part of the kink. i wonder about the disconnect of the folks not seeing difference.
There's a generation of men who grew up with porn being their only real sex education. I feel for the women who must, inevitably, deal with such creatures, having been at the receiving end of an abusive relationship when still in my teens.
That's not to say that all porn is abusive or even that those who watch extreme gangbang porn end up being abusive; rather it's that there's a certain percentage who honestly believes that such is a standard expression of sexual caprice. It ain't.
Is all same sex porn really not exploitative of the individuals for the market demand?
I personally find most porn extremely dull, as I have said many times and much of it very unpleasant, but I do quite like a bit of CFNM, is that OK because the women either do or pretend to like objectifying men?
My erotic is OK, yours is nasty?
Breeders eh? :wink:
Yeah, you caught me: CFNM porn is both hot and exploitative, though I've yet to see an example of the genre where the male wasn't
obviously a consenting partner to his objectification.
On the other hand, there's a whole lot of man-on-male* porn coming from the eastern part of central Europe and much more from Russia which is blatantly exploitative. There's even more coming from Mexico and South America (Brazil, natch), where the entire object of the shoot seems predicated on abuse and exploitation (see MachoFucker, et al), where consent seems, at best, a quaintly risible concept.
*A term I've coined but which is oddly
à propos to this thread...
Yet I *love* that shit, and I'm many things but I'm neither a creep nor predatory in my actual sexual expression. Go figure: I also have scads of ultra-rough gangbang porn on my external hard drive. At least I got rid of all that phoney pseudo-non-consensual BangBus pustulence: yay me!
