There is a thread (several in fact) about the shape of the glans, which got me thinking. If a man is circumcised, or has the foreskin pulled back, its easy to see what shape it is, but what about when the foreskin is covering the glans? In some cases you can see the outline of the glans quite clearly under the foreskin, but in others there is hardly any outline at all. It seems to depend more on the shape of the glans than the length of the foreskin. Can you see the outline of your glans clearly under the skin? I can.