What's clear to me is that a lot of folks don't have any clear sense of what is appropriate social behavior in general and don't give a shit about anyone else's sensibilities, especially if they don't know them. While I completely agree with your logic, any halfway conscious considerate person will not presume, but will come down on the side of what is broadly socially acceptable, whether it makes logical sense or not, in this situation or any other. Sadly, that is becoming less and less a concern for people in our increasingly inconsiderate self-absorbed society.
Well as a politeness, and in deference to the taboos of others you may be correct that the right thing to do is to not shave one's balls in public changing room showers.
But one could argue the opposite, that presuming that others should respect one's personal taboos by not performing certain activities in your presence is rude and that presuming that one set of taboos should predominate in deference when others may not share these taboos is offensive.
We have all sorts of taboos in society that are generally accepted but make no logical sense. Why is it acceptable for men to be barechested but not women? Don't tell me it's because breasts are sexual. They're only objectified and perceived that way because they're covered up all the time. Victorian men would pop a boner at the sight of a woman's calf or upper arm. How many men do that anymore?
And yet there are situations in which women are allowed to go bare-chested, such as at the beach. But again this is an example of the illogic of taboo. Why the maritime periphery or the shores of lakes and rivers or the poolside should become a venue in which the rules regarding female barebreastedness should suddenly dissolve is a prime example of blatant illogic. And for these purposes a fairly useful comparison, since while sunbathing topless is deemed acceptable doubtless some other activities involving breasts (I can't think of any, but for the purposes of comparison lets presume they exist) would fall foul of the laws of taboo and be frowned upon.
It may also come down to a matter of intent, or perceived intent. Certainly some would do this not simply for grooming, but as an intentional exhibitionist display. Whether that's their intent or not, others might perceive it as such. It might also be perceived that shaving one's genitals is focusing undue time and attention on them as sexual organs and preparing them for a sexual display vs. just washing them in the natural course of a shower. Probably some guy "washing" or "applying moisturizer" to his dick for five or ten minutes would catch people's attention too. :wink:
But that's the point, these presumptions all arise out of the connotations attributed to these actions by taboos regarding the genitals. If I shaved an arm and spent a long time moisturising it in a public shower, people might think it was odd, perhaps extremely so, but they wouldn't be making all kinds of sexual or semi-sexual associations with this activity.
You might say that the testicles are involved in sexual activity and therefore making taboo sexual associations with them is fairly logical therefore, but in fact the actual act of sex isn't performed directly with the testicles (in the vast majority of cases, I have seen someone literally balls deep in someone else once or twice :biggrin1
and the hands or eyes, indeed a variety of other body parts, are as much involved in the act of sex as testicles are.
The hands in fact are as much sexual organs as the testicles are if not more so considering how direct their involvement is in a huge variety of sexual activities. And yet taboo does not apply to them, and it might be considered a good idea to spend long amounts of time cleaning and grooming them as a sensible hygienic precaution.
Your point about exhibitionism is interesting in that it could be used to describe almost any activity which a person could perform while nude in a public shower or locker-room. Is standing at a sink shaving one's face while naked in this environment interpretable as exhibitionist?
I mean ultimately if the taboo was exhibitionism the licence for public nudity in a public shower and locker-room would be the point of conflict, not the specific act of shaving one's balls in a public shower.
The possibility that shaving one's balls publicly is in some cases a sexual act, and that some will perceive it that way, and will therefore have there sense of the taboo offended only returns us to the point about the genitals being regarded as the site on the body most associated (in some cultures at least) with taboos surrounding sex.
I think it's fine, if it's the kind of environment where that is unquestionably considered acceptable (although I imagine those venues and situations are relatively rare) or if you are alone, or in the company of people you are absolutely sure won't be offended, and if there's no chance of a stranger popping by. In fact, depending on who's doing the shaving and how they're going about it, it could be hot. Then again, it could be really creepy. If there is any question though, I think it's entirely self-centered to impose your sense of propriety (or lack thereof) on other people, people who have every right to be comfortable in a shared public space as you do.
Well of course that's true, but that argument could as I say, be reversed completely and make perfect sense also. Isn't it rather self-centered to expect others to respect one's sense of propriety regarding the genitals by not shaving them in a public shower where the performance of a large variety of other acts of ablution and grooming are perfectly acceptable?
And on the subject of taboos not being respected, I don't suppose most people in frequent contact with people of East Asian (Chinese, Japanese, Korean etc) ethnic background remind themselves that to look an older person from this ethnic background directly in the eye for too long is considered deeply inappropriate, and that handing someone something or indeed accepting something into one's hands with one's left hand is very rude in many of these cultures, nor for that matter would we expect ourselves to be constantly cognisant of the fact that we shouldn't sit with our feet pointed at people from this background who practice Buddhism since in traditional Buddhist taboo the feet are considered the nadir of the body while its zenith is the head, making the feet a taboo area of the body.
Some of us might be aware of these rules of conduct, and some might observe them, but very few people not from that background would find themselves annoyed at others also not from that background, forgetting, ignoring or simply being unaware of these rules.