Shia Labeouf - Real or Fake?

Real or Fake?

  • Real

    Votes: 48 22.2%
  • Fake

    Votes: 168 77.8%

  • Total voters
    216

dreamer20

Worshipped Member
Gold
Platinum Gold
Joined
Apr 14, 2006
Posts
7,963
Media
3
Likes
19,708
Points
643
Gender
Male
Shia Labeouf is a young, lanky, narrow shouldered individual.
The large head is expected in this foreshortened ( by perspective) image of his upper body.
 

Meniscus

Legendary Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2007
Posts
3,434
Media
0
Likes
1,947
Points
333
Location
Massachusetts, United States of America
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
the picture is not a fake.

The head appears out of proportion, with the center of the face exaggerated because the picture was taken very close with a wide angle lens...

this creates a doorknob effect...

I agree with this explanation and the similar explanations given by dreamer. I also think it looksl like his body...or what I imagine his body would look like if it were buff.

However, someone did point out to me that in this pic the tattoo on his left shoulder is missing. However, I have seen pics of celebrities with their tattoos photoshopped out, so that could have been done here.

This is a bit off-topic, but here are some nice pics of Shia's treasure trail.

http://innerjoejoe.files.wordpress.com/2008/03/shia-labeouf-treasure-1.jpg
http://innerjoejoe.files.wordpress.com/2008/03/shia-labeouf-treasure-2.jpg

What do you think, are these real or fake?

http://innerjoejoe.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/lavacheshia.jpg
http://innerjoejoe.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/lavacheshia2.jpg

Ben kissing Shia? What's that about?

http://cache.viewimages.com/xc/2390...752006EF5F0EDEC430B938808F7905A5397277B4DC33E
 

Deno

Cherished Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2006
Posts
4,631
Media
1
Likes
410
Points
303
Sexuality
No Response
if you went to ouchpost and checked it out the blogger happened to post there this short quote...

"The shirtless sepia-tone, "wet" image was submitted to Ouchpost by famed photographer Bert Shirt, done for a magazine photo spread ostensibly to coincide with the hit movie star's new adventure film release. Hot!" If they know Bert Shirt did the pics obviously you can see his watermark sig on the photo so IT"S NOT FAKE. However the photo at ouchpost is clipper a bit and it not where this pic came from.
 

Meniscus

Legendary Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2007
Posts
3,434
Media
0
Likes
1,947
Points
333
Location
Massachusetts, United States of America
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
if you went to ouchpost and checked it out the blogger happened to post there this short quote...

"The shirtless sepia-tone, "wet" image was submitted to Ouchpost by famed photographer Bert Shirt, done for a magazine photo spread ostensibly to coincide with the hit movie star's new adventure film release. Hot!" If they know Bert Shirt did the pics obviously you can see his watermark sig on the photo so IT"S NOT FAKE...

As I've indicated in previous threads, I don't really see the fakeness of the pic and I'd really like it if it turned out to be real. Here's the problem: I haven't been able to find any information about "famed photographer Bert Shirt." If he's so famous, how come I haven't been able to establish that he exists?

When the new Indiana Jones movie comes out, we'll know for sure one way or another. Either this pics (and more like it) will offically be released and published, or they won't be.
 

BlackIsKingSize

Legendary Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Mar 21, 2007
Posts
637
Media
54
Likes
2,215
Points
498
Location
SC, US
Verification
View
Sexuality
Pansexual
Gender
Male
It looks odd to me but I'm no where near savvy enough to call it fake or not. If it is real, then good for him.
If they know Bert Shirt did the pics obviously you can see his watermark sig on the photo so IT"S NOT FAKE.
If the watermark is just where it says "Photo: Bert Shirt" in slightly faded letters then that doesn't prove anything as it'd be extremely easy to slap on any picture.