shooting for distance vs. jizz volume

[Krusader]

i think both is kinda hot, but volume is sexier

 

[Depends_on_Weather]

The two tend to go together, but if I'm intent on showing off for a girl, I like a few well-aimed 3-point shots that hit her eyebrows after pulling out in missionary, rather than a dozen layups that drip into her mouth from above.

What's really awesome after cumming is being able to finger-walk a rope all the way from her hips to her head and touch semen every step of the way.

 

[kayman]

One without the other is kinda pointless... seeing a powerful, heavy load shoot out is best. If the guys shoots far, once or twice and then is empty... it just seems unbalanced. I hate when guys just dribble during their orgasm, there's no strength in that.

I have to agree if it is dribbles out then seems like a guy isn't into it as much, but shooting out seem just "off".

 

[softyadmirer]

can't speak for guys here, but for women, the more semen volume, the more oxytocin = LASTING pleasure = addiction to guy's penis = lust = amazingness = control...

 

[D_Edwin Eatser]

Gooey mess (giving and receiving) in reality, but distance in porn is always impressive and arousing.

 

[Johndoesmith]

I think I can do both as my videos show.

 

[deleted2516]

Back in my single days I always went for distance! So fun to watch the chicks freak out! I never would warn them and shoot by "accident ". Silly girls. In my youth, I splashed my fair share of headboards, bedside tables, curtains, etc !

 

[JohnnyRoberts]

I prefer to make a big sloppy mess with my cum, but I'm more of a shooter (as my vids show). It depends on the build up to the cum shot. The more prolonged the action, the further it squirts.

 

[hotdogmustard]

There is such an aesthetic involved in a good shot, a strong reflection of the development and execution of a really deep orgasm. I am a distance shooter, and it always, always makes an impression.