Should Clinton bow out?

swordfishME

Expert Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2006
Posts
960
Media
0
Likes
136
Points
263
Location
DFW Texas
Sexuality
80% Gay, 20% Straight
Gender
Male
I think a stronger case could be made that at the first opportunity, PRESIDENT Obama nominate HILLARY Clinton for the supreme court. She is a lawyer. Yes she has never been a judge but there is precedent for nominating a lawyer who has never been a judge. She would never have to worry about being elected again. She would be a thorn in the right's side for the rest of her life. She could push her liberal agenda with gusto with NO political repercusssions....I see a Cief Justic Hillary Clinton in the future. I think she would make a great supreme court justice.


I can see that but not Chief Justice simply because the current chief justice is a decade younger than her and will be around for the next thirty years or so. That’s one of the things that the republican presidents do really well- their SCOTUS nominees are really conservative and relatively young.
 

transformer_99

Experimental Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2006
Posts
2,429
Media
0
Likes
10
Points
183
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
As close as they both are she'll run until Obama beats her outright with delegates period. As it should be ! This is like being down by a td or fg in football, and then just giving up at the half or end of the 3rd quarter. I believe Hillary leads with superdelegates though and Obama has delegates vote lead, both slim margins for either.

Now McCain's opposition, McCain secured the necessary votes.
 

B_VinylBoy

Sexy Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2007
Posts
10,363
Media
0
Likes
70
Points
123
Location
Boston, MA / New York, NY
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
There is a chance that the longer the democratic fight goes on the more people are going to be turned off by the democrats. Face it, they will have to get more negative to try and knock the other one out of the race.

They were saying on CNN that Bill Clinton didn't secure the Democratic nomination till June of the 1992 election year. If that's the case, then I wouldn't worry too much about the Clinton/Obama contest for the this year's nomination. If anything, there's no reason for Clinton to stop her campaign now. Everyone thought this was Hillary's last hurrah and she wound up resurrecting her campaign. Even Huckabee decided to roll on with a much bigger deficit in delegates against McCain until last night.

It's starting to get interesting again... Hillary is starting to gain momentum again. I wonder what's next?

I think Obama will also come under heavy attack from the republcians because McCain would rather face Clinton than Obama

I kinda think the opposite. If Obama wins, they could easily use the same tactics that Hillary used in order to gain some ground. They could easily attack his experience and make it seems as if he's making a ton of promises with no real plan. Grant it, Obama probably has a policy & plan for all of the things he's talked about, but at least with his now two opponents you know they have some kind of plan in place to follow or readjust. The Republicans would havea much harder time against Hillary because she would have no problems challenging McCain on the issues and his track record. They would have to resort to more smear tactics against Clinton, which means more BS about her husband lying about getting head by an intern and many other trivial things that have nothing to do about today's issues.

I still hoping against hope that the final Democratic ticket would be Clinton/Obama. Because then, Republicans would REALLY have a battle on their hands!
 

VeeP

Sexy Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2005
Posts
1,752
Media
0
Likes
30
Points
268
Gender
Male
I still hoping against hope that the final Democratic ticket would be Clinton/Obama.
It may be imperative that they pair up in order to keep from cratering the party. As neither is likely to concede until very late in the game, a big question remains as to whether they'd be able to mount a sufficiently substantial general campaign in the time remaining after the convention. A lot of Democrats have major heartburn this morning, especially those who created the complex proportionate system and "super" delegates. They'll now be forced to deal with MI and FL. Sucks to be Howard Dean right now.
 

naughty

Sexy Member
Joined
May 21, 2004
Posts
11,232
Media
0
Likes
39
Points
258
Location
Workin' up a good pot of mad!
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Female
It may be imperative that they pair up in order to keep from cratering the party. As neither is likely to concede until very late in the game, a big question remains as to whether they'd be able to mount a sufficiently substantial general campaign in the time remaining after the convention. A lot of Democrats have major heartburn this morning, especially those who created the complex proportionate system and "super" delegates. They'll now be forced to deal with MI and FL. Sucks to be Howard Dean right now.


Yeeeee Haaaaaaaa! It's going to be a bumpy ride!
 

D_Gunther Snotpole

Account Disabled
Joined
Oct 3, 2005
Posts
13,632
Media
0
Likes
75
Points
193
As close as they both are she'll run until Obama beats her outright with delegates period. As it should be ! This is like being down by a td or fg in football, and then just giving up at the half or end of the 3rd quarter. I believe Hillary leads with superdelegates though and Obama has delegates vote lead, both slim margins for either.

The two next duels are in Wyoming (a caucus, 18 delegates) and Mississippi (primary, 40 delegates).
Obama has clocked Clinton in caucuses, and Mississippi, with its large black population, is also apt to go for him.
So Clinton has to win a good two-thirds of the delegates thereafter to arrive at the convention with a lead.
But we can pretty much concede North Carolina (primary, May 6, 134 delegates), which also has a large black population, to Obama.
So the likelihood of Hillary making up the shortfall is remote.
With her ongoing slippage among superdelegates, I think her ass has been waxed.
 

B_becominghorse

Sexy Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2006
Posts
1,111
Media
0
Likes
33
Points
183
Location
new york city
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
She's actually got a real chance despite the delegate count. The media has been strongly chastised for the obvious bias, and her win was in no way expected, given how much more money he had to spend. He was yesterday babyish telling refs that they shouldn't have paid attention to the accusation of 'media bias'. Of course--they had been in his favour, he liked that, and then they were called on it. If he keeps acting like a baby, and his tiresome wife keeps up her usual bullshit, a holding pattern is what she can bank on, although not guaranteed. He already cut down a lot of his 'inspiration', as Seelye put it in her NYTimes Live Blogging, even by the time he was faced with the reality of the Ohio results. No way if she didn't bow out when the Obama people tried to really push at her last week she's going to do it before trying out Pennsylvania. She's on another roll, and the Obama people are not able to be as thrilled as they'd wish. He's a 'wonky lawyer like Hillary', according to Maureen Dowd and others, which means that nobody is going to be half-literate like Bush, but he's more of a permanent campaigner and showboy than he is a born governing type ready to do the unglamorous work of hammering out policy.

She may still not win, but I've lost confidence in him, and if she does not get the nomination, I'll vote for McCain, who is a good man even if I think his policies are often full of shit. His not some little frat boy like Bush, and although I wouldn't vote for him because of his elegant wife, she certainly is a beauty.

Obama could easily become petulant, because he thought everything was in the bag last night. He has no idea what a general election would feel like, according to most. Hillary already knows what that is, and knows what is to be embarrased in front of the entire world; and yet her guts always show up at unpredictable times. I've never been more sold on her than last night. She's just plain gorgeous in that Ohio speech. The woman is fucking brilliant.

Think the talk about appointing her Chief Justice is meaningless and far-fetched, because there are no impending vacancies. Sort of like hoping they'll match up Tom and Nicole in a movie now that they're divorced--unlikely.
 

D_Dan_T_Zinferno

Experimental Member
Joined
Feb 29, 2008
Posts
112
Media
0
Likes
7
Points
103
I don't see any reason for her to concede at this point in the race. Regardless of Obama's lead among delegates, she's taken the popular vote in nearly all the large state primaries and several of the smaller ones. Her fundraising has been more than adequate to support her continuing on, even if Obama has raised significantly more. I think it would be a mark against her if she gave up so easily, which I really don't think she'll do regardless of pressure from Obama's supporters.
 

Industrialsize

Mythical Member
Gold
Platinum Gold
Joined
Dec 23, 2006
Posts
22,256
Media
213
Likes
32,279
Points
618
Location
Kathmandu (Bagmati Province, Nepal)
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
As close as they both are she'll run until Obama beats her outright with delegates period. As it should be ! This is like being down by a td or fg in football, and then just giving up at the half or end of the 3rd quarter. I believe Hillary leads with superdelegates though and Obama has delegates vote lead, both slim margins for either.

Now McCain's opposition, McCain secured the necessary votes.
Margins are Not slim
Pledged Delegates Obama 1307 Clinton 1175
Superdelegates Obama 208 Clinton 250

Plus Obama has a cache of 50 previously uncommitted superdelegates that he will "roll out" over the next few weeks as reported by Tom Brokaw, a respected newsman who would not have said this if he didn't have confirmation in my humble opinion

She's actually got a real chance despite the delegate count. The media has been strongly chastised for the obvious bias, and her win was in no way expected, given how much more money he had to spend. He was yesterday babyish telling refs that they shouldn't have paid attention to the accusation of 'media bias'. Of course--they had been in his favour, he liked that, and then they were called on it. If he keeps acting like a baby, and his tiresome wife keeps up her usual bullshit, a holding pattern is what she can bank on, although not guaranteed. He already cut down a lot of his 'inspiration', as Seelye put it in her NYTimes Live Blogging, even by the time he was faced with the reality of the Ohio results. No way if she didn't bow out when the Obama people tried to really push at her last week she's going to do it before trying out Pennsylvania. She's on another roll, and the Obama people are not able to be as thrilled as they'd wish. He's a 'wonky lawyer like Hillary', according to Maureen Dowd and others, which means that nobody is going to be half-literate like Bush, but he's more of a permanent campaigner and showboy than he is a born governing type ready to do the unglamorous work of hammering out policy.

She may still not win, but I've lost confidence in him, and if she does not get the nomination, I'll vote for McCain, who is a good man even if I think his policies are often full of shit. His not some little frat boy like Bush, and although I wouldn't vote for him because of his elegant wife, she certainly is a beauty.

Obama could easily become petulant, because he thought everything was in the bag last night. He has no idea what a general election would feel like, according to most. Hillary already knows what that is, and knows what is to be embarrased in front of the entire world; and yet her guts always show up at unpredictable times. I've never been more sold on her than last night. She's just plain gorgeous in that Ohio speech. The woman is fucking brilliant.

Think the talk about appointing her Chief Justice is meaningless and far-fetched, because there are no impending vacancies. Sort of like hoping they'll match up Tom and Nicole in a movie now that they're divorced--unlikely.
Justice John Paul Stevens is 88
Justice
Antonin Scalia is 72
Justice
Anthony Kennedy is 72
Justic
Ruth Bader Ginsburg is 75

All likely to be replaced during the next 8 years
 

MischievousOne

Experimental Member
Joined
May 12, 2004
Posts
65
Media
2
Likes
5
Points
228
Location
Minneapolis, MN
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
Margins are Not slim
Pledged Delegates Obama 1307 Clinton 1175
Superdelegates Obama 208 Clinton 250

Plus Obama has a cache of 50 previously uncommitted superdelegates that he will "roll out" over the next few weeks as reported by Tom Brokaw, a respected newsman who would not have said this if he didn't have confirmation in my humble opinion

Actually, just under 53% of the pledged delegates to her just over 47% is pretty slim. I know it's late in the game, and that the percentages aren't likely to shift much, but they really are close.

As to the Superdelegates - Even if you count the extra 50 superdelegates (Is he holding them like trump cards?) he has pledged, that only puts him up by a total of eight in that category. Also, those people are under no true obligation to stick with him. Or Clinton. So it really still is either candidates race.

So in response to the original question, no, she should not drop out of the race just yet. If nothing else we get a chance to see what ideas are out there and keep people talking about the democrats!
 

rexcasual

Experimental Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2006
Posts
216
Media
0
Likes
4
Points
163
Location
Southern Ontario
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Negative campaigning has shown how well it works. For Clinton to succeed, her campaign will have to stick to that strategy for many weeks to come. Even so, the math is really against her.

It's fair for Obama to finally face some of this. People need to see how he fares under pressure, as he would tested more severely by the Republicans in an election campaign in any case.

Florida and Michigan delegates are desperately needed by Clinton. Her spokesman is strongly arguing that Florida and Michigan deserve their chance to be heard, so there will be a big fight within the Democrats to get those states into the count — perhaps by rerunning those primaries.

None of this is good for the Democrats if it drags on acrimoniously all spring and summer into the convention. They will need to be unified, not bloodied, to decisively win in November. The winner is going to need the support of the loser's troops. There is some puzzling number of supporters on both the Clinton side and Obama side who have indicated they may cross over to McCain if their candidate loses the nomination.

I think the Democrats will have to consider how this process is working toward enhancing their election chances in November. Heed Nader's admonishment that the election is their's to lose.
 

B_becominghorse

Sexy Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2006
Posts
1,111
Media
0
Likes
33
Points
183
Location
new york city
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
Margins are Not slim
Pledged Delegates Obama 1307 Clinton 1175
Superdelegates Obama 208 Clinton 250

Plus Obama has a cache of 50 previously uncommitted superdelegates that he will "roll out" over the next few weeks as reported by Tom Brokaw, a respected newsman who would not have said this if he didn't have confirmation in my humble opinion


Justice John Paul Stevens is 88
Justice Antonin Scalia is 72
Justice Anthony Kennedy is 72
Justic Ruth Bader Ginsburg is 75

All likely to be replaced during the next 8 years

Being 'a respected newsman' as a credential is about as impressive as saying an 'unnamed official', except the latter usually can be trusted to be telling the truth since they have immunity.

No interest in the Supreme Court Justice business, it's all fantasy anyway. You're just being an Obama supporter, I'm being a Hillary supporter, we neither one care that much what the other thinks, and are just fighting for our candidate.
 

Gonzo3

Experimental Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2008
Posts
1,110
Media
3
Likes
13
Points
123
Location
World wide dudes ,world wide
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Now that McCain has officially secured the republican nomination, the democrats are looking at a protracted battle (the next big knock-out race is on April 22) which could hurt the party in the end.

Should Hillary Clinton leave the race? Yeah, she won Ohio and Texas but it is still not enough for her re-take the delegate lead. Is it time for her to concede the race or still go on?

Or do you think she should keep at it until all of the primaries are finished (because at this point it is impossible for anyone to secure the nomination in a two- way race based on pledged delegates alone)?
............Yes.
 

B_becominghorse

Sexy Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2006
Posts
1,111
Media
0
Likes
33
Points
183
Location
new york city
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
I don't see any reason for her to concede at this point in the race. Regardless of Obama's lead among delegates, she's taken the popular vote in nearly all the large state primaries and several of the smaller ones. Her fundraising has been more than adequate to support her continuing on, even if Obama has raised significantly more. I think it would be a mark against her if she gave up so easily, which I really don't think she'll do regardless of pressure from Obama's supporters.

Yes, that's it, the BIG STATES, all of which big urban states she's one except his home state. While many are saying it's unlikely that she can pull this off, that's just bullshit prediction without knowing anything about the future. If popular feeling goes toward her and she wins in Pennsylvania, which many compare in some ways to Ohio, and he looks like a weakling, then she may prevail. But, since in primaries you can win delegates due to apportionment (as Obama did in several primaries) even if you lose the race, we see how electoral vote doesn't count in more ways than just what was proven with the evil of 2000.
 

B_becominghorse

Sexy Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2006
Posts
1,111
Media
0
Likes
33
Points
183
Location
new york city
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
Negative campaigning has shown how well it works. For Clinton to succeed, her campaign will have to stick to that strategy for many weeks to come. Heed Nader's admonishment that the election is their's to lose.

I certainly do hope it works against Obama, as he's doing plenty of it too. But anybody who would advise someone to 'heed Nader', world's homeliest and most full-of-shit egomaniac (in a way worse than Cheney or Bush by now, like a turd out of Kafka, a dungbeetle like Gregor Samsa into eating shit) is from another planet. What an asshole to be giving advice since it's largely his fault that the world has turned into poison; what he did before in his 'good works' period pales in comparison to the damage he's done because Gore and some of the others hurt his little-girl feelings by condescending to him. Reminds me of Karl Fucking Marx.
 

B_becominghorse

Sexy Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2006
Posts
1,111
Media
0
Likes
33
Points
183
Location
new york city
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
Clintons Mission Not-Impossible - Campaign Stops - 2008 Elections - Opinion - New York Times Blog

This is excellent by David Brooks, Republican, on what Hillary can do. A must-read.

This is the part to keep in mind when trying to decide today what can't be decided today: "she can move to Pennsylvania. It’s a long time before April 22nd. Over the next few weeks, media interest in that primary will build and build. Obama’s string of primary victories will recede into the deepest recesses of memory. Pennsylvania will begin to look like the crucial deciding state and a win there will carry climactic weight. We are used to narratives in which the climax comes at the end of the story, not the middle."