Interesting. FDR was viewed as a great liberator for freeing Europe.
If you say so. FDR, in my view, was like any other president, he did some good and some bad. Just curious (I will look it up later, but I am honestly curious, and also want to hear your take on it) how long did FDR leave occupying troops in any European country after that country's leader was deposed or the foreign occupying forces were evicted?
Bush ? He's an imperial colonist, even though he removed a despotic dictator and allowed Iraqis and Afgahanis to elect their own government .
Uh, yeah, I would call it that; our troops liberated France from occupying German forces, right? So, deposing another country's leader and occupying that country for, oh, another 4 or 5 or 8 years after, that does smack a bit of empire-building. Besides, the French asked for help. Did the Iraqis?
No[w] where do you suppose all those countries around he world got the notion that Bush was an imperial colonist?
From the fact that he invades countries, occupies them, and vows to institute a form of government that the people do not want.
All the those articles in moonbat places like truthout about Bush lying to get us into Iraq to steal their oil ???
If you believe for one moment that money and oil had nothing to do with it, and bush invaded Iraq simply out of the goodness of his altruistic little heart, you are more deluded than the left-bat moon-wing blogs you love to rant about.
P. S. By the way, how do you explain the illegal no-bid contract awarded to Halliburton, and their continued poor performance? I'm sure that had nothing to do with george doing a favor for his ole buddy dick, right?