Should I wear these pants to work?

catman

Cherished Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2004
Posts
2,413
Media
0
Likes
364
Points
208
Location
Ga
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
Ok so like it says, should i wear these pants to work? I want opinions about how my cock looks in them. Please be honest I'm a big boy I can take it.


I wish more men would.... shame that men can't be...well, men any longer.
 

The Dragon

Sexy Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2007
Posts
5,767
Media
0
Likes
51
Points
193
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
just being honest... those pants look cheap. not "on trend". you're missing a belt. fit is poor too.


I had a second look and they are a size or 2 too small for him.
Look at the side pockets. They aren't laying flat, they're gaping.

The overall effect is cheap and nasty as all hell.
 

twoton

Superior Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2011
Posts
7,865
Media
1
Likes
8,302
Points
268
Location
Mid Atlantic
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
I agree with some others: wear a belt, and also the pants just aren't very flattering. They look kind of worn out.
 

D_Bubba_Butter

Account Disabled
Joined
Feb 4, 2012
Posts
2,814
Media
0
Likes
95
Points
83
just being honest... those pants look cheap. not "on trend". you're missing a belt. fit is poor too.

What no-one has asked is what the OP does in these trousers. My job requires me to be smart. If I owned my own bookshop, I would be more relaxed, but still smart. If I were a gardener I'd wear casual and hard wearing. Et cetera...

If you are required to be smart, I think it's best to avoid being 'on trend' as trends are fickle. I wear suits for work, cut from good British cloth along classic city lines. Some of my trousers are flat fronted, which means that you can see an outline. This is unavoidable with some tailoring. But I look smart, feel pretty confident with that & don't give two hoots, along with my colleagues, about the contours of my gentleman's area. I tend not to have erections at work as I am no longer an adolescent, so that doesn't trouble me. Or anyone else.

If you wish to deliberately show off a bulge at work, become a male stripper.
 

GBB

Experimental Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2005
Posts
121
Media
0
Likes
5
Points
163
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Yep, if your pants have belt loops , there should be a belt.
 

D_Bubba_Butter

Account Disabled
Joined
Feb 4, 2012
Posts
2,814
Media
0
Likes
95
Points
83
Yep, if your pants have belt loops , there should be a belt.

Trousers should have a belt for one of two reasons:

A) they are too big at the waist.
B) you think it looks good.

To say you need to wear a belt simply because there are loops is like saying you need rain whenever you drive a car, simply because it has windscreen wipers.

Tosh. Also bunkum.
 

GBB

Experimental Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2005
Posts
121
Media
0
Likes
5
Points
163
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Hey it's just a rule like, you don't wear belts and suspenders at the same time unless you're from Texas.
 

masked_marauder

Experimental Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2005
Posts
373
Media
7
Likes
14
Points
163
Age
42
Location
Suburban Maryland
Sexuality
80% Gay, 20% Straight
Gender
Male
Trousers should have a belt for one of two reasons:

A) they are too big at the waist.
B) you think it looks good.

To say you need to wear a belt simply because there are loops is like saying you need rain whenever you drive a car, simply because it has windscreen wipers.

Tosh. Also bunkum.

i would generally add some other rules:

C) professional situation
D) wearing dress shoes (the belt should match)
E) the way you wear your pants cause the belt loops to flare open (such as if you have a bit of spare tire or gut causing the top of the waistband to curl out a little) - it's odd seeing pants with loops and no belt if the loops are open... they tend to look like rings at your side
 

D_Bubba_Butter

Account Disabled
Joined
Feb 4, 2012
Posts
2,814
Media
0
Likes
95
Points
83
i would generally add some other rules:

C) professional situation
D) wearing dress shoes (the belt should match)
E) the way you wear your pants cause the belt loops to flare open (such as if you have a bit of spare tire or gut causing the top of the waistband to curl out a little) - it's odd seeing pants with loops and no belt if the loops are open... they tend to look like rings at your side

The US approach to lounge wear does bemuse me sometimes. What kind of professional situation did you have in mind? HM Armed Forces uniforms - I'd need something to secure my scabbard to... And why dress shoes? A belt isn't really like cufflinks or a tie stud (if we are looking for an Edwardian bent), finishing off the details; it's a functional item.
 

dcsurvivor92

Sexy Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Posts
787
Media
0
Likes
97
Points
63
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
I'd like to work where you work. If not, you can gladly come to my house where I would be happy to remove them for you. Just kidding...maybe. No, seriously, if you want to draw attention to yourself, that is surely one way to do it. You certainly will be noticed.
 

NudePreston

Legendary Member
Verified
Gold
Platinum Gold
Joined
Apr 14, 2005
Posts
668
Media
52
Likes
2,134
Points
748
Location
Miami Beach (Florida, United States)
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
I say 'yes' to wearing them -- and a belt. Chinos w/o a belt just looks like you forgot to put it on. And draws more attention to the 3rd leg hanging down your left side!

Jeans and shorts = no belts ok. (just my two-centavos!)