Sick of versatile neutral porn

mallak

Legendary Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Posts
4,057
Media
0
Likes
1,490
Points
258
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
How could you think you're alone? Around 50 percent of the people in this thread including myself pretty much agree with you. Maybe you were hoping for a higher percentage?
 

sizeaddict28

Worshipped Member
Gold
Platinum Gold
Joined
Apr 25, 2012
Posts
624
Media
184
Likes
11,284
Points
613
Location
Atlanta (Georgia, United States)
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
I'm not a fan of versatile porn, I much prefer defined roles (total top and total bottom). Seeing two guys both suck and fuck each other isn't exactly boring, it's just a plain ole turn-off for me. It all has to do with what your preferences are in general. If you like being versatile, then you're going to love versatile porn. If you like being a total top or a total bottom (like myself), then you're going to want to see defined roles in porn. If I'm watching a so-called bottom getting throatfucked and banged hard by a wellhung so-called top, then I don't want to suddenly see the top dropping to his knees and bending over for the bottom's cock.

There's nothing wrong with either genre, it's just that gay porn seems to be more versatile-dominant. That probably has more to do with porn producers getting more bang for their buck from versatile porn...you take two smoking hot guys with gorgeous faces, big cocks, and amazing asses and show them both getting sucked off/sucked and both topping and bottoming...it's like a two-for-one deal. That one scene in that one video shows it all (and generates more revenue). It just doesn't cater to those of us that like defined roles.
 
  • Like
Reactions: aj_rolla

D_22

Cherished Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2011
Posts
2,383
Media
33
Likes
490
Points
228
Location
NYC
Sexuality
60% Gay, 40% Straight
Gender
Male
I'm not a fan of versatile porn, I much prefer defined roles (total top and total bottom). Seeing two guys both suck and fuck each other isn't exactly boring, it's just a plain ole turn-off for me. It all has to do with what your preferences are in general. If you like being versatile, then you're going to love versatile porn. If you like being a total top or a total bottom (like myself), then you're going to want to see defined roles in porn. If I'm watching a so-called bottom getting throatfucked and banged hard by a wellhung so-called top, then I don't want to suddenly see the top dropping to his knees and bending over for the bottom's cock.

There's nothing wrong with either genre, it's just that gay porn seems to be more versatile-dominant. That probably has more to do with porn producers getting more bang for their buck from versatile porn...you take two smoking hot guys with gorgeous faces, big cocks, and amazing asses and show them both getting sucked off/sucked and both topping and bottoming...it's like a two-for-one deal. That one scene in that one video shows it all (and generates more revenue). It just doesn't cater to those of us that like defined roles.

Actually, for me as a porn viewer, I feel like I have to actively look for versatile porn. Usually I find the typical top/bottom stuff with no trouble. I click or find any video, that's what I see. It's rare that I find a verse porn without me actually purposely looking for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WillyLong

g_whiz

Experimental Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2009
Posts
270
Media
8
Likes
14
Points
163
Location
Raleigh NC
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
yea and thats why vers porn is getting more and more boring...straight porn is nasty and raw and gay porn needs to learn from it.

I'd argue that gay porn is learning from it. The idea that there are "tops" and "bottoms" and some guys in real life only prefer to bottom etc... that and straight people (stupidly) ask "who's the girl" blah blah blah all of that is a riff on heteronormative sexual relationships. I think everyone assumes straight sexual norms are the default. Its the reverse really. Versatility in sex is usually rarer...because its only hot if someone's submissive and the other aggressive apparently. I just don't see the point of acting like both parties liking penetrating and being penetrated equally is really this big a deal.
 

mallak

Legendary Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Posts
4,057
Media
0
Likes
1,490
Points
258
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
I think what is irritating is that versatile gay guys often seem to feel superior to tops and bottoms, that we just have a some sort of fake , childish allegiance to our "roles", which were "imposed on us by straight people". They seem convinced that versatile homosexuality is the only authentic type of homosexuality. Sorry vers guys, we're just as authentic as you, and it's just sex, we should only do what we want to do, not feel like we have to do shit out of some obligation to being a ''real" homosexual or "rebellion against the straight male patriarchy" or "sexual fairness/boringness" blah blah blah lol
 

D_Meurius_Rump

Experimental Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Posts
199
Media
0
Likes
19
Points
53
How could you think you're alone? Around 50 percent of the people in this thread including myself pretty much agree with you. Maybe you were hoping for a higher percentage?
No but more people in the thread were bashing it than for it. I was kind of hoping for links or recommendations, but now that I think of it, an honest opinion is pretty cool too.
 

D_Meurius_Rump

Experimental Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Posts
199
Media
0
Likes
19
Points
53
I think what is irritating is that versatile gay guys often seem to feel superior to tops and bottoms, that we just have a some sort of fake , childish allegiance to our "roles", which were "imposed on us by straight people". They seem convinced that versatile homosexuality is the only authentic type of homosexuality. Sorry vers guys, we're just as authentic as you, and it's just sex, we should only do what we want to do, not feel like we have to do shit out of some obligation to being a ''real" homosexual or "rebellion against the straight male patriarchy" or "sexual fairness/boringness" blah blah blah lol
Exactly. In the end, its all sex, and if someone gets satisfaction from it then who cares what kind of sex it is. Sure, sometimes its okay for me to see two guys in some versatile action...but usually not. Just not my cup of tea. Whether my sexual preference as a bottom is some kind of deeply embedded programming by the straight status quo- I am not sure- but who cares really. Honestly I don't take sex THAT seriously.
 

D_Meurius_Rump

Experimental Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Posts
199
Media
0
Likes
19
Points
53
I'm not a fan of versatile porn, I much prefer defined roles (total top and total bottom). Seeing two guys both suck and fuck each other isn't exactly boring, it's just a plain ole turn-off for me. It all has to do with what your preferences are in general. If you like being versatile, then you're going to love versatile porn. If you like being a total top or a total bottom (like myself), then you're going to want to see defined roles in porn. If I'm watching a so-called bottom getting throatfucked and banged hard by a wellhung so-called top, then I don't want to suddenly see the top dropping to his knees and bending over for the bottom's cock.

There's nothing wrong with either genre, it's just that gay porn seems to be more versatile-dominant. That probably has more to do with porn producers getting more bang for their buck from versatile porn...you take two smoking hot guys with gorgeous faces, big cocks, and amazing asses and show them both getting sucked off/sucked and both topping and bottoming...it's like a two-for-one deal. That one scene in that one video shows it all (and generates more revenue). It just doesn't cater to those of us that like defined roles.
I couldn't of said any of this better myself. What a TURN OFF to see the big man top suddenly turn and suck dick! You're so right that porn producers are probably just afraid to take the route of assigned roles, they figure they will show everything and that way there is something for everyone. Really they kind of end up ruining the scene.
 

D_22

Cherished Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2011
Posts
2,383
Media
33
Likes
490
Points
228
Location
NYC
Sexuality
60% Gay, 40% Straight
Gender
Male
I think what is irritating is that versatile gay guys often seem to feel superior to tops and bottoms, that we just have a some sort of fake , childish allegiance to our "roles", which were "imposed on us by straight people". They seem convinced that versatile homosexuality is the only authentic type of homosexuality. Sorry vers guys, we're just as authentic as you, and it's just sex, we should only do what we want to do, not feel like we have to do shit out of some obligation to being a ''real" homosexual or "rebellion against the straight male patriarchy" or "sexual fairness/boringness" blah blah blah lol

Meh, in no way do I find myself superior in anyway because I feel verse is "the way." By now I'm used to knowing a majority of the people in "my community" have define roles as tops and bottoms and I don't hold that against them. They like what they like. But for me, it just doesn't work and it's not for me. I never looked at it as falling into hetereosexual imposed roles, but I can see that argument also.

Also, I don't see how we can't bring up our points as to why we prefer the verse mentality while everyone else against it is cool to say that they hate verse mentality and that it "should" be roles, etc. Everyone's just stating their opinions as to why it works or doesn't for them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WillyLong

D_22

Cherished Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2011
Posts
2,383
Media
33
Likes
490
Points
228
Location
NYC
Sexuality
60% Gay, 40% Straight
Gender
Male
I couldn't of said any of this better myself. What a TURN OFF to see the big man top suddenly turn and suck dick! You're so right that porn producers are probably just afraid to take the route of assigned roles, they figure they will show everything and that way there is something for everyone. Really they kind of end up ruining the scene.

See? Like this type of post.

But for me, it's a massive turn on. Also, you're jumping into these big conclusions, not even knowing if maybe the top himself is into the act and doesn't mind performing it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WillyLong

D_Meurius_Rump

Experimental Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Posts
199
Media
0
Likes
19
Points
53
See? Like this type of post.

But for me, it's a massive turn on. Also, you're jumping into these big conclusions, not even knowing if maybe the top himself is into the act and doesn't mind performing it.
Well aren't these porn stars only objects? I am not supposed to be wondering or not whether he is really truly into it. I'm not supposed to know him as a person. Not the point.
 

sizeaddict28

Worshipped Member
Gold
Platinum Gold
Joined
Apr 25, 2012
Posts
624
Media
184
Likes
11,284
Points
613
Location
Atlanta (Georgia, United States)
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
See? Like this type of post.

But for me, it's a massive turn on. Also, you're jumping into these big conclusions, not even knowing if maybe the top himself is into the act and doesn't mind performing it.


They're actors....they're getting paid to do what they do...if the top doesn't want to be a top then either he would quit or he'd be fired, just like on any other job. Whether they actual like the roles they play is irrelevant (although it would make for a better scene if they did)...what matters is how well they play the roles.
 

D_Meurius_Rump

Experimental Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Posts
199
Media
0
Likes
19
Points
53
They're actors....they're getting paid to do what they do...if the top doesn't want to be a top then either he would quit or he'd be fired, just like on any other job. Whether they actual like the roles they play is irrelevant (although it would make for a better scene if they did)...what matters is how well they play the roles.
Yea no one is forcing anyone to do anything...if a guy wants to be vers he can go audition for a vers porn company. If the guy is a top beast, then chances are it is one of his favorite things to do- top.
 

sizeaddict28

Worshipped Member
Gold
Platinum Gold
Joined
Apr 25, 2012
Posts
624
Media
184
Likes
11,284
Points
613
Location
Atlanta (Georgia, United States)
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
And to reiterate, it's not "just" about the defined roles, but how those roles are played. Yes, we all know that being gay doesn't always mean acting feminine, but that's no reason it should be minimized and even brought out more in porn...it's PORN for crying out loud...acting, fantasy, make-believe..performed by those who know how to put on a great sex show in front of the camera, and those that know how to use the camera to get those perfect shots that really bring out the scene. Why can't there be a pair up with 6'5" man with huge muscles and a 5'7" slim cute face guy with a bubble-shaped girlish ass? ...why can't the positions be representative of the dom/sub, masc/fem roles so strongly portrayed in straight porn? There's clearly a market for it.
 

D_22

Cherished Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2011
Posts
2,383
Media
33
Likes
490
Points
228
Location
NYC
Sexuality
60% Gay, 40% Straight
Gender
Male
Yea no one is forcing anyone to do anything...if a guy wants to be vers he can go audition for a vers porn company. If the guy is a top beast, then chances are it is one of his favorite things to do- top.

Oh, so you agree now then. No one's forcing anyone to do anything, if they wish to do what they like, then they should. So let the verse performers be verse and let them be allowed to be enjoyed by the ones who enjoy them. I'm glad we can come to an understanding.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WillyLong

D_Meurius_Rump

Experimental Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Posts
199
Media
0
Likes
19
Points
53