I'm not a fan of versatile porn, I much prefer defined roles (total top and total bottom). Seeing two guys both suck and fuck each other isn't exactly boring, it's just a plain ole turn-off for me. It all has to do with what your preferences are in general. If you like being versatile, then you're going to love versatile porn. If you like being a total top or a total bottom (like myself), then you're going to want to see defined roles in porn. If I'm watching a so-called bottom getting throatfucked and banged hard by a wellhung so-called top, then I don't want to suddenly see the top dropping to his knees and bending over for the bottom's cock.
There's nothing wrong with either genre, it's just that gay porn seems to be more versatile-dominant. That probably has more to do with porn producers getting more bang for their buck from versatile porn...you take two smoking hot guys with gorgeous faces, big cocks, and amazing asses and show them both getting sucked off/sucked and both topping and bottoming...it's like a two-for-one deal. That one scene in that one video shows it all (and generates more revenue). It just doesn't cater to those of us that like defined roles.
yea and thats why vers porn is getting more and more boring...straight porn is nasty and raw and gay porn needs to learn from it.
Lol yea I definitely think that is gross which is weird because I think facials are so hot
No but more people in the thread were bashing it than for it. I was kind of hoping for links or recommendations, but now that I think of it, an honest opinion is pretty cool too.How could you think you're alone? Around 50 percent of the people in this thread including myself pretty much agree with you. Maybe you were hoping for a higher percentage?
Exactly. In the end, its all sex, and if someone gets satisfaction from it then who cares what kind of sex it is. Sure, sometimes its okay for me to see two guys in some versatile action...but usually not. Just not my cup of tea. Whether my sexual preference as a bottom is some kind of deeply embedded programming by the straight status quo- I am not sure- but who cares really. Honestly I don't take sex THAT seriously.I think what is irritating is that versatile gay guys often seem to feel superior to tops and bottoms, that we just have a some sort of fake , childish allegiance to our "roles", which were "imposed on us by straight people". They seem convinced that versatile homosexuality is the only authentic type of homosexuality. Sorry vers guys, we're just as authentic as you, and it's just sex, we should only do what we want to do, not feel like we have to do shit out of some obligation to being a ''real" homosexual or "rebellion against the straight male patriarchy" or "sexual fairness/boringness" blah blah blah lol
I couldn't of said any of this better myself. What a TURN OFF to see the big man top suddenly turn and suck dick! You're so right that porn producers are probably just afraid to take the route of assigned roles, they figure they will show everything and that way there is something for everyone. Really they kind of end up ruining the scene.I'm not a fan of versatile porn, I much prefer defined roles (total top and total bottom). Seeing two guys both suck and fuck each other isn't exactly boring, it's just a plain ole turn-off for me. It all has to do with what your preferences are in general. If you like being versatile, then you're going to love versatile porn. If you like being a total top or a total bottom (like myself), then you're going to want to see defined roles in porn. If I'm watching a so-called bottom getting throatfucked and banged hard by a wellhung so-called top, then I don't want to suddenly see the top dropping to his knees and bending over for the bottom's cock.
There's nothing wrong with either genre, it's just that gay porn seems to be more versatile-dominant. That probably has more to do with porn producers getting more bang for their buck from versatile porn...you take two smoking hot guys with gorgeous faces, big cocks, and amazing asses and show them both getting sucked off/sucked and both topping and bottoming...it's like a two-for-one deal. That one scene in that one video shows it all (and generates more revenue). It just doesn't cater to those of us that like defined roles.
I think what is irritating is that versatile gay guys often seem to feel superior to tops and bottoms, that we just have a some sort of fake , childish allegiance to our "roles", which were "imposed on us by straight people". They seem convinced that versatile homosexuality is the only authentic type of homosexuality. Sorry vers guys, we're just as authentic as you, and it's just sex, we should only do what we want to do, not feel like we have to do shit out of some obligation to being a ''real" homosexual or "rebellion against the straight male patriarchy" or "sexual fairness/boringness" blah blah blah lol
I couldn't of said any of this better myself. What a TURN OFF to see the big man top suddenly turn and suck dick! You're so right that porn producers are probably just afraid to take the route of assigned roles, they figure they will show everything and that way there is something for everyone. Really they kind of end up ruining the scene.
Well aren't these porn stars only objects? I am not supposed to be wondering or not whether he is really truly into it. I'm not supposed to know him as a person. Not the point.See? Like this type of post.
But for me, it's a massive turn on. Also, you're jumping into these big conclusions, not even knowing if maybe the top himself is into the act and doesn't mind performing it.
See? Like this type of post.
But for me, it's a massive turn on. Also, you're jumping into these big conclusions, not even knowing if maybe the top himself is into the act and doesn't mind performing it.
Yea no one is forcing anyone to do anything...if a guy wants to be vers he can go audition for a vers porn company. If the guy is a top beast, then chances are it is one of his favorite things to do- top.They're actors....they're getting paid to do what they do...if the top doesn't want to be a top then either he would quit or he'd be fired, just like on any other job. Whether they actual like the roles they play is irrelevant (although it would make for a better scene if they did)...what matters is how well they play the roles.
Yea no one is forcing anyone to do anything...if a guy wants to be vers he can go audition for a vers porn company. If the guy is a top beast, then chances are it is one of his favorite things to do- top.
sure. and more bottom guys like this http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ltt5w5eoNx1qg3fzoo1_500.jpgOh, so you agree now then. No one's forcing anyone to do anything, if they wish to do what they like, then they should. So let the verse performers be verse and let them be allowed to be enjoyed by the ones who enjoy them. I'm glad we can come to an understanding.