Size Categories!!!

losercock

Experimental Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2012
Posts
60
Media
0
Likes
10
Points
43
Location
New York City (New York, United States)
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
Ok. Here is a little fun game to play. Basically you have the 8 categories and you range of cock sizes that fit that category. It's fun to see what everyone thinks should be belong in a certain category.


LENGTH:
Micro: 0-3'' Inches long
Tiny: 3-4'' long
Small: 4-5'' long
Kinda Small: 5-6'' long
Average: 6-7'' long
Kinda Big: 7-7.5'' log
Big: 7.5-8'' long
Huge: 8 + long

GIRTH:
Micro: 0-3.5'' Girth
Tiny: 3.5-4.0'' Girth
Small: 4.0-4.5'' Girth
Kinda Small 4.5-5'' Girth
Average: 5.0-5.5'' Girth
Kinda Big: 5.5-6'' Girth
Big: 6.0-6.5'' Girth
Huge: 6.5'' + Girth

Does anyone have a different personal chart? This is mostly based on my personal observations.
 

lafever

Superior Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2007
Posts
4,923
Media
29
Likes
2,728
Points
333
Location
USA
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
*:popcorn:............Awaits the universe's most asked question, when is a cock big enough?.....................*


Answer:

male- It's never big enough.
female - It's too big now.

C.
 
Last edited:

AnonForever

Legendary Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Dec 5, 2011
Posts
210
Media
25
Likes
1,466
Points
413
Location
United States
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Guess I do well here with 8.5 x 7. But shouldn't only double digit length be "huge"?

Double digits...right. The only category most double digits fit in is "fake".

Anyways, I fit huge for both categories, but idk, it doesn't seem huge.
 
D

deleted3782

Guest
Double digits...right. The only category most double digits fit in is "fake".

Anyways, I fit huge for both categories, but idk, it doesn't seem huge.

Why can't you be 1% gay? :tongue:
 

dirkjesje

Loved Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2009
Posts
1,407
Media
26
Likes
674
Points
258
Location
belgium
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
Does anyone have a different personal chart? This is mostly based on my personal observations.

A chart distilled out of the lifestyle condoms survey with 5 categories [ micro -3std; small from -1std upto -3std; average -1std to +1std; big from +1std upto +3std; huge +3std ]

LENGTH:
Micro: 0-3'' Inches long => less than 3.4"
Tiny: 3-4'' long
Small: 4-5'' long => less than 5.0"
Kinda Small: 5-6'' long
Average: 6-7'' long => 5.0"-6.6"
Kinda Big: 7-7.5'' log
Big: 7.5-8'' long => more than 6.6"
Huge: 8 + long => more than 8.2"

GIRTH:
Micro: 0-3.5'' Girth => less than 3.4"
Tiny: 3.5-4.0'' Girth
Small: 4.0-4.5'' Girth => less than 4.4"
Kinda Small 4.5-5'' Girth
Average: 5.0-5.5'' Girth => 4.4"-5.4"
Kinda Big: 5.5-6'' Girth
Big: 6.0-6.5'' Girth => more than 5.4"
Huge: 6.5'' + Girth => more than 6.4"
 

sydneycity

Just Browsing
Joined
Aug 26, 2012
Posts
1
Media
1
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
sydney city
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
who wrote this rubbish

i have measured heaps of guys i have been with for quirkyt fun and most are 4-5 inches but they all thought they were 7-8 inches till i prooved them wrong with facts

Ok. Here is a little fun game to play. Basically you have the 8 categories and you range of cock sizes that fit that category. It's fun to see what everyone thinks should be belong in a certain category.


LENGTH:
Micro: 0-3'' Inches long
Tiny: 3-4'' long
Small: 4-5'' long
Kinda Small: 5-6'' long
Average: 6-7'' long
Kinda Big: 7-7.5'' log
Big: 7.5-8'' long
Huge: 8 + long

GIRTH:
Micro: 0-3.5'' Girth
Tiny: 3.5-4.0'' Girth
Small: 4.0-4.5'' Girth
Kinda Small 4.5-5'' Girth
Average: 5.0-5.5'' Girth
Kinda Big: 5.5-6'' Girth
Big: 6.0-6.5'' Girth
Huge: 6.5'' + Girth

Does anyone have a different personal chart? This is mostly based on my personal observations.
 

sdg475

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Jan 31, 2007
Posts
647
Media
95
Likes
7,736
Points
598
Location
NYC
Verification
View
Sexuality
90% Straight, 10% Gay
Gender
Male
I tend not to trust any information from studies like durex/lifestyles. I believe both were on a voluntary basis- one of them even being conducted as a spring break gimmick... That said, I think each attracts a certain "cocky" type and steers away others.

If you look at any info published by urologists the numbers are always lower. One study published avg erect length at 5.1 inches and another stretched, bpel at 5." A third study regarding girth suggested that on a sample of 300+ men the avg erect girth ranged from 3.7-3.9".

All quite a bit smaller than what we hear people spouting.
 

dirkjesje

Loved Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2009
Posts
1,407
Media
26
Likes
674
Points
258
Location
belgium
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
I tend not to trust any information from studies like durex/lifestyles. I believe both were on a voluntary basis- one of them even being conducted as a spring break gimmick... That said, I think each attracts a certain "cocky" type and steers away others.

If you look at any info published by urologists the numbers are always lower. One study published avg erect length at 5.1 inches and another stretched, bpel at 5." A third study regarding girth suggested that on a sample of 300+ men the avg erect girth ranged from 3.7-3.9".

All quite a bit smaller than what we hear people spouting.
I never saw a study with an average midshaft girth (erected) below 4".
Below 4" is quiet thin, you know?

Studies going out from Durex/Lifestyle are very reliable, because they need to sell condoms in the right segment, this means -1std and +1std from median. (=+68% of the market)
 

durden

Experimental Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2009
Posts
136
Media
0
Likes
5
Points
103
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
I get sdg's point, though your chart seems much more accurate.

self-reported studies should be ignored. as for others, if you have a small penis chances are you don't want a group of people to see it and measure you and report your member in the books as being officially small, especially with women involved. all the big dick exhibitionists would be glad to show up, show off and make it official they are huge and potentially skew the average.