I like your point, though I'm sure the example isn't ideal. A novel in the style of James Bond would surely be out of place on this forum. I would expect more focus on the member at issue.And I assure you a story where some people "incidentally" have a big cock can be quite powerful. Or even a story where it intervenes, but not all the time. Just look at the Bond novels by Ian Fleming.
I agree that if the barbarian could have found some clever and unexpected way to evade the effects of the priestess's spell, that would have been awesome. Unfortunately, how he might do that is beyond me. He had no magical abilities and no allies with a motivation to do that for him. I had seen several posts suggesting that it would be good for him to keep it. I considered it for a while, but found now way to manage it without failing to kill the priestess. And since her death was so heavily foreshadowed, I couldn't not do it.The barbarian could, for example, get back his old dick, without any chance of losing it again (through another method, or by cheating the evil priestess)
If she could have died and then it looked like he was going to lose his dick, but then suddenly he pulls out an ace and says, "Oh, but no, I've outsmarted that fate," that would have been great, but even now I can't see where that would come from.
From my perspective, that seems practically the same as what did happen, though I can imagine that some people have more delicate senses than I do. If I had chosen to go that way early enough, I could simply have changed the effect of the priestess's death. Losing the use of your dick would surely be just as effective a loyalty incentive as losing your dick entirely.But somehow, he would be prevented from ever using it again (through a flaw inherent to that method, not being able to gain an erection, perhaps because he's killed or raped the wrong person in the past)
The priestess was dead and he'd lost his penis. I think that justifies a little hopeless depression, though I see your point. Maybe he should have immediately gone on another quest to get his penis back. It could be that I just wanted to finally end the story and I let that affect my depiction of the character.He just gives up, which is also very out of character. Barbarians, like Conan, the archetypal one, are heroes and positive characters by definition, albeit utterly bloody... They just don't give up adventuring.
Easier said than done, though. I notice you don't offer any specifics about how the barbarian could have been victorious in that situation. It is a bit late now, but it would have been good to get a PM from you suggesting good ways to end the story. On the other hand, since I have no plans to write anything by installments in the future, even that won't be useful.I kept wanting a surprising twist to happen... A good one would have been the barbarian's victory, but it could have been anything, really.
I thought the reason was very clear! What part of the reason or explanation do you find weak? The priestess put a spell on herself so that any man who has sex with her will lose his penis if she dies. That has enormous practical benefits and very little downside because as long as she stays alive everyone stays happy. For her, it seems like a very clever ploy to keep men loyal.Just find a good reason to. If there's no good reason for something as drastic as penis-shrivelling, well, you'd better learn to write better than that, and explain to the reader why you did it.
Do you need a stronger explanation for why she used this trick on the barbarian? That seems almost too obvious to explain further. He's a barbarian with a sword and no regret about killing clerics.
Do you need a stronger explanation for why Ella killed the priestess? The priestess does evil things and Ella is morally against that, since Ella declares herself to be good. The priestess was the real reason that Elrad briefly lost his penis, and the resulting adventure caused Ella to be raped by a lich. All that stuff was right there in the story.
Do you need a stronger explanation for why the barbarian didn't find some sort of antidote for the priestess's spell? He was quite busy during this story. The one bit were he got a break, he spent it having sex with the priestess. There was nothing explicit, but he just assumed that he had plenty of time to work out that problem before it became an issue.
So there were four reasons why he lost his dick, all of them pretty clear from the story, I thought. I guess you disagree, so feel free to point out which of them was weakly explained or implausible.
I'm surprised by how much you seem to feel that the barbarian losing his dick was a completely sudden and spontaneous event with no connection to the story. I can't see why else you would bring up a random-slip-and-fall death.A good example of that is the perfectly unnecessary death of one character in the Deryni cycle by Katherine Kurtz (also fantasy setting)... One of the "good guys", married and with kids, and perhaps the most scrupulous of them all, just slips and falls head first on a marble step as they're running from danger. He dies, just like that, and it's completely unnecessary for the plot.
Until now I hadn't highlighted the reasons why it happened, but you seem to understand this story as well or better than any of the other people who have read it, so I expected more from you. On the other hand, I understand that you are disgusted by the loss of his dick and I suppose you are letting that disgust affect your reasoning. I can't fault you for that.
Whoa. Do I understand you correctly that the random pointless death was actually a good thing? I'm amazed that you would come to that conclusion, but I haven't read the book so I will take your word for it.It's absolutely terrible, the reader broods and broods... And a few scenes later, the widow is being (somewhat unsuccessfully) conforted, by the fact that... well, it just happens. And life goes on, and they still need her for the cause, so indeed she goes on, because that's what her late husband would have wanted. And that ends up giving much more depth to the whole novel.
I admit that I don't really understand the genre that I was mimicking. I just took an inspiration from dungeons and dragons, a game which I've never actually played, and went from there.This guy's dick shriveling in your story, it doesn't bring anything. It's just inviting the reader to witness infantile cruelty at tearing apart the wings of a bird, and slowly at that, because it's predictable and methodical. Since this is a story and a fantasy setting, the reader keeps expecting the bird to escape and magically fly off, because it's a characteristic of the genre you chose to use... But it doesn't.
I suppose in my mind the barbarian wore out any sympathy with all his raping and murdering. It seemed fine to abuse him at the time. On the other hand, perhaps he did have some of the qualities of an underdog. If you look at him as an underdog then he definitely should have won in the end. I hate stories that have underdogs that don't win.
It's practically the same thing. One way or another, it got your attention, so it's a job well done.I wasn't brooding at the story, I was brooding at you.