Are you an engineer by any chance? Just wondering.
No.
Are you an engineer by any chance? Just wondering.
No, your post didn't affect my opinion of flaccid vs erect size. I have read much on this subject before. I agree with you that for the majority of men
your data is probably pretty close. However, majority just implies more than 50%, that still leaves many guys who don't fit your data. There are guys on here who claim 2" flaccid and 8" erect. I don't really see the incentive for them to lie about that. Others are 6" flaccid and 6" erect.
This varies so much from one guy to another. Most do probably fall into the range of your data, though. Another reason flaccid size seems to vary so much is that it's affected by temperature and other factors. You can never quite be sure if a penis is completely flaccid or not...
Hmm.
Well, You can see my penis from my pictures. It is over 6" when erect. When it's soft though, it's just about the same size as this guy's, I guess. It really depends though. Sometimes it'll shrink to 3" (which looks pretty ridiculous with my taller than average stature) and sometimes it hands meaty and nice at about 4 1/2-5". When my penis is somewhere inbetween those two stages, it is roughly the same size as this guy's penis, which I'd consider average.
Then again, this is just from me looking at the mirror and not comparing my cock to anyone elses and my height can have something to do with it. I'm not sure though.
My post was about the general statement people make all the time that growers catch up with showers, that it equals out overall. It's the overall I'm talking about, for that is what people are talking about when they say it. My point was that the general statement as it is typically presented -growers are about the same as showers when erect- is not correct. You choose to throw in the this and that. That doesn't address what my post was about.
Wouldn't it also depend if the guy just came out of the cold water or not ? You girls could be getting it all wrong :wink: .
I agree that MOST of the time growers don't catch up with showers.
Has that been your viewpoint while at LPSG, or are you one of the very many here who have posted that there is no difference overall, but you have now adjusted your opinion as a result of my post?
Actually most of the cocks you see at a nudist beach are little tiddlers, but that's partly because they belong to fat old men who sadly make up the majority in those places.
I've been to a few nudist beaches in the US in my time and that's the same conclusion I've reached. Perhaps my expectations are too high but I've yet to see a really hot physique, male or female, at a nudist beach.
But really though, I think what you see at nudist beaches is pretty much what you see out anywhere - "real people", just there they are not wearing clothes!
Agreed.
I made my comment not with the intention of appearing elitist or hyper-selective but rather with the observation that those hottie physiques are actually quite rare IRL. The real world is much different (i.e. more diverse) than what we see on the big screen from Hollywood, porn flicks or TV. I, for one, am glad not to see many of those greek god statues everywhere because I pale by comparison.
I've been to a few nudist beaches in the US in my time and that's the same conclusion I've reached. Perhaps my expectations are too high but I've yet to see a really hot physique, male or female, at a nudist beach.
thanks for all answers and feedback.
Your question: yes its me, sure (holliday-pic)
Thanks for the compliment.... body like a grecian/greek stature.
Really ? does it look so much like that???:smile:
thanks for all answers and feedback.
Your question: yes its me, sure (holliday-pic)
Thanks for the compliment.... body like a grecian/greek stature.
Really ? does it look so much like that???:smile:
I've seen a few fairly hot female bodies at the nudist beach here, but hey, it is Norway!