youngbuck00
Experimental Member
What makes you think there aren't women who select their multiple lovers with care?
There are, but that's not the definition of a slut.
What makes you think there aren't women who select their multiple lovers with care?
Besides the obvious fact that your sex organ hangs outside your body, and mine is inside my body, and that my body bears children and feeds them for a certain amount of time, what exactly are our gender roles? Am I supposed to be barefoot and pregnant? Is that my gender role? How else are men and women not the same? Can I not be as good a doctor or lawyer? I only have to work twice as hard and get paid less. Can I not run for president?
I'm simply dying for you to clarify.
Don't tell me I am wrong just because you want me to be wrong, _____.
ManlyBanisters and LaFemme, you both rock.
Now I'm not trying to say a woman should never be President, but can we PLEASE pick her from the RIGHT??? I think the 2008 election proved that we do not want a first timer (black man in Obama's case) coming from the left. That is, unless we like running our country into the ground![]()
I fucked a whole lot of dudes over the span of just a few years. I prefer to have sex daily, so I saw four dudes at a time during those years. If I stopped seeing one, I replaced him as quickly as was practical. Usually, that was within the week. I chose them carefully; we didn't ever start out as friends, but they had to be the kind of guys I could be friends with. Some of them actually have become friends. They had to like the same kind of sex I liked. They had to have clean homes (messy was okay, dirty was not). They had to stimulate my intellect and my funny bone. They had to be hot. Just okay looking didn't work. They had to let me pursue them and not pursue me. They had to have documented evidence that they were disease free. They had to be sane, and free-spirited. They had to be open about sex so that I could show them what I wanted, and they could show me what they wanted. They could not be jealous of the other three men. I was sometimes open to the possibility of being their girlfriend, but preferred men who were not looking for that. I was horny, not desperate or unhappy. I was very selective, and had sex at least four times a week, usually with a different man each time. It was fun. If I were ever single again, I might conduct myself the same way.
If a slut is a promiscuous woman, then I have been a slut. It was awesome! There was nothing negative about it. I wanted sex, not a boyfriend.
Thank you - though sometimes when I rock it is back and forth, in the foetal position, in a padded cell, chanting 'makethemstopmakethemstopmakethemstop'. :smile:
I fucked a whole lot of dudes over the span of just a few years. I prefer to have sex daily, so I saw four dudes at a time during those years. If I stopped seeing one, I replaced him as quickly as was practical. Usually, that was within the week. I chose them carefully; we didn't ever start out as friends, but they had to be the kind of guys I could be friends with. Some of them actually have become friends. They had to like the same kind of sex I liked. They had to have clean homes (messy was okay, dirty was not). They had to stimulate my intellect and my funny bone. They had to be hot. Just okay looking didn't work. They had to let me pursue them and not pursue me. They had to have documented evidence that they were disease free. They had to be sane, and free-spirited. They had to be open about sex so that I could show them what I wanted, and they could show me what they wanted. They could not be jealous of the other three men. I was sometimes open to the possibility of being their girlfriend, but preferred men who were not looking for that. I was horny, not desperate or unhappy. I was very selective, and had sex at least four times a week, usually with a different man each time. It was fun. If I were ever single again, I might conduct myself the same way.
If a slut is a promiscuous woman, then I have been a slut. It was awesome! There was nothing negative about it. I wanted sex, not a boyfriend.
No problem hereThey had to let me pursue them and not pursue me.
sluttiness isn't the same as hooking.
hooking is for money.
sluttiness is for a myriad of reasons.
the two are not the same.
I fucked a whole lot of dudes over the span of just a few years. I prefer to have sex daily, so I saw four dudes at a time during those years. If I stopped seeing one, I replaced him as quickly as was practical. Usually, that was within the week. I chose them carefully; we didn't ever start out as friends, but they had to be the kind of guys I could be friends with. Some of them actually have become friends. They had to like the same kind of sex I liked. They had to have clean homes (messy was okay, dirty was not). They had to stimulate my intellect and my funny bone. They had to be hot. Just okay looking didn't work. They had to let me pursue them and not pursue me. They had to have documented evidence that they were disease free. They had to be sane, and free-spirited. They had to be open about sex so that I could show them what I wanted, and they could show me what they wanted. They could not be jealous of the other three men. I was sometimes open to the possibility of being their girlfriend, but preferred men who were not looking for that. I was horny, not desperate or unhappy. I was very selective, and had sex at least four times a week, usually with a different man each time. It was fun. If I were ever single again, I might conduct myself the same way.
If a slut is a promiscuous woman, then I have been a slut. It was awesome! There was nothing negative about it. I wanted sex, not a boyfriend.
I see you keepin it ruh.in the words of mr. Tupac Shakur: "I don't want it if it's that easy"
Anyone ever read about a time when being a prostitute was a respected profession for masters of the sensual "Arts"? Why is it in this repressed day and age we still feel the need to strip women of their right to do whatever the FUCK they want too with their bodies? And why in the hell do we perpetuate a double standard in which men are conquerors and women are lowly beings slaves to their lusts? Stupid. That much dumb CANT be ignorance. Half the damned men, and I use the term loosely, in this thread believe some truly ridiculous shit. I'm not going to dispute their so called scientific evidence because it is barely scientific and biased as all get out. If you believe half that crap you have a screw loose. All these so called studies are all susceptible one thing, human error. And how many "scientific" reports have been overturned years later? Such as the report stating that smoking is good for your nerves... Lol then oh noes we fucked up its cancerous! C'mon. Grow a brain. oh and that shit about politics needs to GTFO now. This is NOT the thread for your right wing agenda. Thanks.