Agreed. To put it another way for the more left-brained, analytic, & quantitative of us:
Compared with porn and with pretty much all of mainstream media, A few visits to a nude beach will give you a much more accurate idea of what guys' bodies look like ... not only the dick but the rest of the body as well. Mainstream media's representation of what a guy is supposed to look like is just as unrealistic as porn's representation of what average dick size is.
There's something else that's been mentioned once or twice in other threads. IMO, dick size is definitely included but it's just one of many items on the list.... Suppose you're turned on in general by a guy's body characteristics A, B, & C but characteristic D doesn't do anything for you. Now supposed you meet a guy who has the perfect A,B, and C for you, but his D is seriously fucked up. Do you stop trying to get into his pants because of D? I doubt it highly. You notice D but it's just not relevant. You're like, "Yeah. And this is important because...?"
I have two friends who definitely do not meet society's standards of 'attractive'. Yet my dick finds them EXTREMELY attractive. So I'm supposed to NOT get naked and have fantastic sex with them because of society's arbitrary standards. I think not, lol.
Nudist beaches or resorts are not the preserve of those with perfect bodies.
Nudists come in all shapes and sizes and plenty have smaller cocks.