Small penis support group

soren10

Legendary Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Apr 22, 2014
Posts
2,875
Media
12
Likes
2,150
Points
273
Location
Athens (Attica, Greece)
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
I'll be one step ahead this time... I don't want to dictate your actions ( future posts ). There are people that get defensive about it. What I'm about to say don't apply to me , because I'm not small but it would be nice if women ( real not fake ) in here would defend the small guys of this site when they get shamed by the big guys. This is a form of support you ladies can show in this forum. I say that again, I don't want to dictate your actions, this is just a suggestion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nosuportneeded

rtg

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Dec 24, 2011
Posts
3,603
Media
1
Likes
9,814
Points
458
Location
Brisbane (Queensland, Australia)
Verification
View
Sexuality
90% Straight, 10% Gay
Gender
Female
... but it would be nice if women ( real not fake ) in here would defend the small guys of this site when they get shamed by the big guys. This is a form of support you ladies can show in this forum. I say that again, I don't want to dictate your actions, this is just a suggestion.
Pretty sure that the majority of the women here tell men time and time again that we support men of all sizes. I don't think that we need to jump in on every situation where a man may feel insecure about his size, we do that enough as is. And not to mention we have our own shit to deal with on here... there's only a handful of men who come to our defense when the misogynist pigs come out to play.

ETA: 90% of my time on this site is spent in women's issues and ask a woman. Because that's where most of my interests lie and where I feel most comfortable.

Also, you can't ignore the men who love sph. Even when they want to be humiliated about their size most of the time we ignore it.
 
6

693987

Guest
Pretty sure that the majority of the women here tell men time and time again that we support men of all sizes. I don't think that we need to jump in on every situation where a man may feel insecure about his size, we do that enough as is. And not to mention we have our own shit to deal with on here... there's only a handful of men who come to our defense when the misogynist pigs come out to play.

Pretty much. Many of the females who frequently post are pretty open about not hating on or discriminating against average or smaller than average guys, in spite of this being a site with a significant focus on more endowed men.

A fair few of us do say we're perfectly okay with whatever a man we're keen on is packing. Hell, some women, even on this site freely proclaim that smaller works better for them. I don't see how that's not being supportive enough. No one on here is obligated to be anyone else's personal cheer squad and/or therapy.

And there is a significant lack of men on here who stand up for the women who get blatant hatred thrown at us by a small but extremely vocal group of individuals, just because we have a vagina. Yet the women generally tough it out and just fucking deal. Or we put the fuckers on ignore and move the fuck on.
 

Nosuportneeded

Superior Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2014
Posts
3,129
Media
26
Likes
5,183
Points
158
Location
West Virginia, USA
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
It is not a need. I don't need an ice cream cone, she doesn't need to be fucked by the right size dick. If I were you I wouldn't be okay with letting your girlfriend have sex with other guys, maybe the other guy has a smaller dick or is not as good at sex as you are. But maybe you do it one time and a guy has a giant dick and really knows how to fuck. You're setting yourself up to be cuckolded. If you were honest, you'd know that is not something you want. You'd be very bothered by it. Most men are weak they don't have the balls to set boundaries for their wife or girlfriend. Love doesn't mean giving your wife or girlfriend everything she wants. Of all the dicks in the world you think yours is the best one for her? Be real. You don't have to be perfect in every way, but you do have to have some balls. Set some boundaries, some expectations, provide for her, give her love and protection and humor. She doesn't need to be satisfied in every way imaginable. I think what holds back a man most is his own shame. Once you stop thinking about pleasing others and more about how you want to be pleased, you free yourself from that burden.

I'm going to respectfully ignore your advice for my relationships. I know me much better than you, although I like to hear good natured advice. Thank you.

Again, I'm just saying it's up to the individual. If they gotta have it, fine. We can't judge whether it's right or wrong.

Also, I cited my anecdotal example to illustrate a person strongly desiring specific sexual wants, not to justify one opinion as law.

I could go on, but @AlteredEgo and @Fade have it more than covered.

BTW, if I found masturbation to be better than sex with a person, life would be much simpler for me.

I agree, getting over sex could be, in a way, transcendental, but it's so good and rewarding that it is transcendental in itself when done right.
 

TooMuchInternet

Expert Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2014
Posts
83
Media
22
Likes
139
Points
43
Location
Harrisonburg City (Virginia, United States)
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
I would never laugh at a man because of some physical feature. Simply being incompatible is not a crime. Simply being incompatible is not something to be ashamed of. It just means he has to find someone else. A micro penis is not for me. Small, I can do. Unusually small? He would have to be so extraordinary otherwise. I can't even imagine how extraordinary he would have to be. And yet I know for sure, that there are women who could be so content with a micropenis. I am simply not among that number. Again, this is just projection based on experience. If I encountered a micropenis I would try it. Who knows? It could blow my mind. I'm open, but skeptical. Masturbation can not scratch the itch for me. Masturbation is something I also need, but a really strong orgasm from penetrative sex is not something that I can replace on my own. A dildo will not do. The feel of his weight on me, the warmth of his breath in my face, his hands frantically searching my body, his body within mine, the heat from his cock as he fills me, it is all nothing short of exquisite.

I look at this like a fat man eating an ice cream cone explaining to me why artificially-sweetened ice cream just won't do. As much as you love getting penetrated by the right size cock you could learn to enjoy getting eaten out just as much or even more if you wanted to. Penis size is too important to people. Too many good men go extinct on account of it. Look at Japan, most 30 year olds there have yet to have their first sexual encounter. I blame porn for this catastrophe, men are intimidated by women. A whole nation almost about to go extinct on account of the size of their penis. So many of these men, are talented artists or engineers, smart people with varied interests. That is the real shame.

I think it is a dark thing for humanity to go down this road of focusing on sexual performance to determine who to procreate with. Is the quality of a man's character, and what they can do better or worse with this endowed man? A man might have a giant glorious dick but not do much good as a person. It bothers me to the extent that woman choose the lesser man with the better dick.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SoaringSpirit

AlteredEgo

Mythical Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2006
Posts
19,175
Media
37
Likes
26,255
Points
368
Location
Hello (Sud-Ouest, Burkina Faso)
Sexuality
No Response
I look at this like a fat man eating an ice cream cone explaining to me why artificially-sweetened ice cream just won't do. As much as you love getting penetrated by the right size cock you could learn to enjoy getting eaten out just as much or even more if you wanted to. Penis size is too important to people.
It's far more like an Olympic figure skater explaining to a little boy with phocomelia why she must have figure skates and not hockey skates. The little boy is in no position to argue because he lacks all relevant equipment and experience. All his counters can amount to is petulant flailing.

A quality sex life is necessary for the psychological health of most adult humans. Knowing what constitutes that for a particular individual is important to that individual's satisfaction and overall well-being. Oral sex is not remotely as satisfying to me as penetration. Satisfactory penetration (for me as an individual) requires that there is an erect penis attatched to a man who knows how to use it. The smaller it is, the firmer the erection needs to be. Above a certain size, a little less rigidity is helpful. This penis needs to apply the right amount of friction and/or pressure to one of several sensitive zones inside my vagina. Approximately 96% of adult males have the equipment within the dimensions I know I would enjoy, though I don't pretend to know how many know how to use it, nor how many struggle with severe E.D. or premature ejaculation, or have become trans-women, all of which would be disqualifying factors for me. So let's generously round it up to 15% of males being poor prospects for starting a relationship with me, either because they can't fuck, genitalia are mis-matched for fit, have swapped genders, or there is a medical problem with functionality. I'm okay with sex being a factor that eliminates 15% of potential partners. Am I some fuck-hole object that must accept 100% of offers? Get real. I don't owe my body nor my heart to anyone.

As I said, many times now, I'm speaking only for myself as an individual. I know of women who are ambivalent about penetration. I am not one. I know of women who are happy as long as their clit is properly stumulated. For me, clitoral stimulation is more like a sherpa guiding bloodflow in order to prepare for the pending avalanche of an internal orgasm. You know. From penetration.

Did you know most of the clit is buried? How do you use it? P-e-n-e-t-r-a-t-i-o-n. (In my individual case, it's penetration combined with firm pressure against my mons pubis.)

Again, this is all about the beginning of a relationship. At the beginning of the relationship, one is looking to pair off with someone who seems ideally suited to oneself. Once commitment is in place, one rolls with the punches, and makes whatever sacrifices one must to hold it together and support each other. If one of those punches eliminates satisfying penetrative sex, that's going to require quite a roll. Huge sacrifice to make. It's not impossible, but it's a really big ask, far too big for someone to ask of me before I have committed, and I would never commit without fucking first.

And no. I would never learn to enjoy oral as much. Oral is fucking amazing. But oral is oral, and fucking is fucking. I prefer penetration. Greatly. The orgasms are bigger and better, it's possible to kiss at the same time, the eye contact, the full-body contact, the synchronization of movement, the bonding (in the case of a close friend or significant other) are all just better during mutually satisfying intercourse. Shall we not forget that if it isn't a fit for me, it isnt a fit for him either.

Japan's population issues are explained thusly by The Economist:

"The chief reason for the dearth of births is the decline of marriage. Fewer people are opting to wed, and those who do are getting married later in life. At least a third of young women aim to become full-time housewives, yet they struggle to find men who can support a traditional family. In better economic times potential suitors had permanent jobs as part of Japan’s “lifetime employment” system. Now many of them have to rely on temporary or part-time work. Other women shun marriage and children because Japan’s old-fashioned corporate culture, together with a dire shortage of child care, forces them to give up their careers if they have children. Finally, young people are bound by strict social codes. Only around 2% of babies are born outside marriage (compared with 30–50% in most of the rich world), which means that as weddings plummet, so do births. And even for those who do start families, the rising cost of child-rearing often imposes a de facto one-child policy."

Your frantic histrionics about size troubles seem largely fantastic.

A man might have a giant glorious dick but not do much good as a person. It bothers me to the extent that woman choose the lesser man with the better dick.
You've decided bigger is better. I have never said that. I have steadfastly asserted that for me there is a too big, and a too small to fit me well enough to satisfy me. I have not gotten into the larger end of that range in this thread, but most would agree that the smaller end, as I projected herein, is really quite small. In fact, though I have been quite prolific in my sexual activity, I have never tried one that small, though I have seen two smaller than that. I have most certainly tried out the upper limit. I have never seen bigger, and if I did, I actually might not be willing to try it out. I would be terrified. If it fits, and we're both getting the right amount of friction and pressure in the right places, it fits.

What makes you think having a dick that fits me well means the guy is a bad egg? Only wonderful, nerdy, silly romantics need apply here. I do 104+ hours of community service a year and give 5-10% of my income to charity. If he's not doing anything worthwhile with his time, talent, and treasure, he's not for me. Misaligned values. I don't have to choose between the right man and the right penis because the right man has the right penis. Duh.

What I think is dark is how insecure little men feel challenged by a woman who pursues exactly what she desires and is uncompromising in that search. These men, always show a glaring failure to fully understand female sexual anatomy, but want to dictate what should feel good enough to her, always skewed to "teach" her to accept that which his own insecurities tell him are flaws, flaws that make him unloveable, unfuckable, and worthless. Meanwhile if he just loved himself, learned how all the pieces are supposed to fit, worked to truly understand human sex parts, and sought natural compatibility, he would never lose sight of his tremendous value. It's easier to lash out instead though.

What happened, Bro? Did she humiliate you? Did she make you feel like you weren't enough? Do you want me to put my hair in cornrows, grease my face and go whoop dat ass for you?
 
Last edited:

AlteredEgo

Mythical Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2006
Posts
19,175
Media
37
Likes
26,255
Points
368
Location
Hello (Sud-Ouest, Burkina Faso)
Sexuality
No Response
As an aside, this analogy
like a fat man eating an ice cream cone explaining to me why artificially-sweetened ice cream just won't do
bothers me as a trained patissier. Real sugar does have an actual physical job in the ice cream making process. Ice cream is custard, and the structure of custard comes from sugar, egg yolks, and air. If you change the structure by eliminating one of those, you irrevocably impact the texture of the finished product. I find you can add air somewhere in the process to mask the lack of sugar, but there's still also the fact that many people can taste the difference between sugar and sweeteners. I know I can. As a diabetic, I eat the substitute. The improved flavor and texture in the original version is not worth losing life or limb. Anyway. I just thought this was interesting to point out.
 

The Meat Rod Cometh

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Jun 9, 2017
Posts
1,220
Media
20
Likes
2,769
Points
258
Location
Boise (Idaho, United States)
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
micro: Is there a brother site , "the Small penis support group", something like this? I think that might be a better site for me to participate in. In many ways the less endowed man might have more to work on emotionally.

I'd be happy to give you guys encouragement and support. Feel free to ask me anything.
You may be very surprised at what you find out.
 

Nosuportneeded

Superior Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2014
Posts
3,129
Media
26
Likes
5,183
Points
158
Location
West Virginia, USA
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
I look at this like a fat man eating an ice cream cone explaining to me why artificially-sweetened ice cream just won't do. As much as you love getting penetrated by the right size cock you could learn to enjoy getting eaten out just as much or even more if you wanted to. Penis size is too important to people. Too many good men go extinct on account of it. Look at Japan, most 30 year olds there have yet to have their first sexual encounter. I blame porn for this catastrophe, men are intimidated by women. A whole nation almost about to go extinct on account of the size of their penis. So many of these men, are talented artists or engineers, smart people with varied interests. That is the real shame.

I think it is a dark thing for humanity to go down this road of focusing on sexual performance to determine who to procreate with. Is the quality of a man's character, and what they can do better or worse with this endowed man? A man might have a giant glorious dick but not do much good as a person. It bothers me to the extent that woman choose the lesser man with the better dick.

I don't think anyone is arguing that a big dick and good sex are or should be the main factors in choosing a partner. However, if they were, that is perfectly legit. I may not agree, but that's just my opinion. To each his own.

I also don't think that the men of Japan are intimidated by the women of Japan or that it is because of porn.
 

Nosuportneeded

Superior Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2014
Posts
3,129
Media
26
Likes
5,183
Points
158
Location
West Virginia, USA
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
As an aside, this analogy

bothers me as a trained patissier. Real sugar does have an actual physical job in the ice cream making process. Ice cream is custard, and the structure of custard comes from sugar, egg yolks, and air. If you change the structure by eliminating one of those, you irrevocably impact the texture of the finished product. I find you can add air somewhere in the process to mask the lack of sugar, but there's still also the fact that many people can taste the difference between sugar and sweeteners. I know I can. As a diabetic, I eat the substitute. The improved flavor and texture in the original version is not worth losing life or limb. Anyway. I just thought this was interesting to point out.


This is also a great point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlteredEgo

TooMuchInternet

Expert Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2014
Posts
83
Media
22
Likes
139
Points
43
Location
Harrisonburg City (Virginia, United States)
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
It's far more like an Olympic figure skater explaining to a little boy with phocomelia why she must have figure skates and not hockey skates. The little boy is in no position to argue because he lacks all relevant equipment and experience. All his counters can amount to is petulant flailing.

A quality sex life is necessary for the psychological health of most adult humans. Knowing what constitutes that for a particular individual is importany to that individual's satisfaction and overall well-being. Oral sex is not remotely as satisfying to me as penetration. Satisfactory penetration (for me as an individual) requires that there is an erect penis attatched to a man who knows how to use it. The smaller it is, the firmer the erection needs to be. Above a certain size, a little less rigidity is helpful. This penis needs to apply the right amount of friction and/or pressure to one of several sensitive zones inside my vagina. Approximately 96% of adult males have the equipment within the dimensions I know I would enjoy, though I don't pretend to know how many know how to use it, nor how many struggle with severe E.D. or premature ejaculation, or have become trans-women, all of which would be disqualifying factors for me. So let's generously round it up to 15% of males being poor prospects for starting a relationship with me, either because they can't fuck, genitalia are mis-matched for fit, have swapped genders, or there is a medical problem with functionality. I'm okay with sex being a factor that eliminates 15% of potential partners. Am I some fuck-hole object that must accept 100% of offers? Get real. I don't owe my body nor my heart to anyone.

As I said, many times now, I'm speaking only for myself as an individual. I know of women who are ambivalent about penetration. I am not one. I know of women who are happy as long as their clit is properly stumulated. For me, clitoral stimulation is more like a sherpa guiding bloodflow in order to prepare for the pending avalanche of an internal orgasm. You know. From penetration.

Did you know most of the clit is buried? How do you use it? P-e-n-e-t-r-a-t-i-o-n. (In my individual case, it's penetration combined with firm pressure against my mons pubis.)

Again, this is all about the beginning of a relationship. At the beginning of the relationship, one is looking to pair off with someone who seems ideally suited to oneself. Once commitment is in place, one rolls with the punches, and makes whatever sacrifices one must to hold it together and support each other. If one of those punches eliminates satisfying penetrative sex, that's going to require quite a roll. Huge sacrifice to make. It's not impossible, but it's a really big ask, far too big for someone to ask of me before I have committed, and I would never commit without fucking first.

And no. I would never learn to enjoy oral as much. Oral is fucking amazing. But oral is oral, and fucking is fucking. I prefer penetration. Greatly. The orgasms are bigger and better, it's possible to kiss at the same time, the eye contact, the full-body contact, the synchronization of movement, the bonding (in the case of a close friend or significant other) are all just better during mutually satisfying intercourse. Shall we not forget that if it isn't a fit for me, it isnt a fit for him either.

Japan's population issues are explained thusly by The Economist:

"The chief reason for the dearth of births is the decline of marriage. Fewer people are opting to wed, and those who do are getting married later in life. At least a third of young women aim to become full-time housewives, yet they struggle to find men who can support a traditional family. In better economic times potential suitors had permanent jobs as part of Japan’s “lifetime employment” system. Now many of them have to rely on temporary or part-time work. Other women shun marriage and children because Japan’s old-fashioned corporate culture, together with a dire shortage of child care, forces them to give up their careers if they have children. Finally, young people are bound by strict social codes. Only around 2% of babies are born outside marriage (compared with 30–50% in most of the rich world), which means that as weddings plummet, so do births. And even for those who do start families, the rising cost of child-rearing often imposes a de facto one-child policy."

Your frantic histrionics about size troubles seem largely fantastic.


You've decided bigger is better. I have never said that. I have steadfastly asserted that for me there is a too big, and a too small to fit me well enough to satisfy me. I have not gotten into the larger end of that range in this thread, but most would agree that the smaller end, as I projected herein, is really quite small. In fact, though I have been quite prolific in my sexual activity, I have never tried one that small, though I have seen two smaller than that. I have most certainly tried out the upper limit. I have never seen bigger, and if I did, I actually might not be willing to try it out. I would be terrified. If it fits, and we're bitj getting the right amount of friction and pressure in the right places, it fits.

What makes you think having a dick that fits me well means the guy is a bad egg? Only wonderful, nerdy, silly romantics need apply here. I do 104+ hours of community service a year and give 5-10% of my income to charity. If he's not doing anything worthwhile with his time, talent, and treasure, he's not for me. Misaligned values. I don't have to choose between the right man and the right penis because the right man has the right penis. Duh.

What I think is dark is how insecure little men feel challenged by a woman who pursues exactly what she desires and is uncompromising in that search. These men, always show a glaring failure to fully understand female sexual anatomy, but want to dictate what should feel good enough to her, always skewed to "teach" her to accept that which his own insecurities tell him are flaws, flaws that make him unloveable, unfuckable, and worthless. Meanwhile if he just loved himself, learned how all the pieces are supposed to fit, worked to truly understand human sex parts, and sought natural compatibility, he would never lose sight of his tremendous value. It's easier to lash out instead though.

What happened, Bro? Did she humiliate you? Did she make you feel like you weren't enough? Do you want me to put my hair in cornrows, grease my face and go whoop dat ass for you?

You're right I did imply that bigger was better when you made it clear that that is not the case for you. I thought you'd understand what I mean anyway. I'm trying my damned hardest to support these people and justify their existence. This man I used to talk to his name is or was Koji, I don't know if he is still alive, but he made an impression on me. lived for years suicidally depressed because of his thin dick. There was a line in Donnie Darko about the smurfs that comes to mind. I was just wondering if it was true. I was wondering if people could find a happy full existence without being a sexual contender. Of course if every man with a micropenis killed themselves there wouldn't be so much status in being well endowed or in your case well equipped. (I don't mean to conflate your preferences for my own) That is, if everyone was well endowed or well equipped, then maybe it would come down to who was the better man. I wonder if a man can really live his life without being driven by sex or sexual inclination, and whether that would be a life worth living. Pardon me for playing Angel's advocate. There was a gay man, a genius and perhaps the greatest war hero of all-time named Alan Turing who had a similar debate with a man named William Jefferson, Jefferson said what separates man from machine is sex drive, Alan refuted the notion and a few years after the debate, Alan Turing was found guilty of homosexuality, given a hormonal treatment to sterilize him and he killed himself as a result.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Meat Rod Cometh

AlteredEgo

Mythical Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2006
Posts
19,175
Media
37
Likes
26,255
Points
368
Location
Hello (Sud-Ouest, Burkina Faso)
Sexuality
No Response
That is, if everyone was well endowed or well equipped, then maybe it would come down to who was the better man.
It already DOES come down to who is the better man for many (possibly most). I doubt anyone is looking for a husband based on dicks. I have NEVER met anyone who was. You keep thinking about the process as if it is a choice between a good man and a bad or mediocre man, and the bad or mediocre man always has a "better" dick. I'm here to tell you that if the bad or mediocre man's poor qualities are obvious to a potential partner making the choice, and this choice is meant to be for life, that guy is no real contender.

In reality, bad guys are eliminated off the bat. By the time there is a choice to be made, it's a choice between good men with differing good qualities. If I have to choose between two great guys, and with one of them I'm consistently unsatisfied sexually, well, he was probably eliminated last week anyway. :p

I'm trying my damned hardest to support these people and justify their existence.
This sentence is the worst! They exist, therefore their existence is justified.

I have said over and over that there are women who could happily make micropenis work, even if I cannot. I bet the same holds for some men as well. Just the fact that something is outside of my experience or desires does not render it irrelevant or undesireable to someone else, maybe even hundreds of millions of someones else. Your posts imply the opposite. And what does it say about you as a man that you value anyone with a pe is more than all women? Do you notice your writing demonizes women who can't get off outside of a specific size range, PURELY because they are physically incapable of doing it, solely so some hypothetical men don't feel badly about themselves. You make these determinations about what all good women can learn to enjoy without ever having experienced a clitoral orgasm" any kind of vaginal orgasm, having never felt a delightful dicking down of your own sensational snatch. Just blind, sweeping, paternalistic assertions. That's disgusting to me. Do you realize the misogyny in that? You'd best check yourself, Sir.

A more egalitarian approach is to recognize the validity of each man's need to feel loved and desired, AND the validity of each person knowing and pursuing only that which is compatible according to their own needs and values. That is the difference between what you are saying, and what I have been saying.

I wonder if a man can really live his life without being driven by sex or sexual inclination, and whether that would be a life worth living.
Really? Have you never heard of asexuals? They seem pretty happy when no one is pressuring them to conform to another sexual expression.:eek:


Are you really comparing men with small dicks to asexuals?
 

TooMuchInternet

Expert Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2014
Posts
83
Media
22
Likes
139
Points
43
Location
Harrisonburg City (Virginia, United States)
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
I'm
It already DOES come down to who is the better man for many (possibly most). I doubt anyone is looking for a husband based on dicks. I have NEVER met anyone who was. You keep thinking about the process as if it is a choice between a good man and a bad or mediocre man, and the bad or mediocre man always has a "better" dick. I'm here to tell you that if the bad or mediocre man's poor qualities are obvious to a potential partner making the choice, and this choice is meant to be for life, that guy is no real contender.

In reality, bad guys are eliminated off the bat. By the time there is a choice to be made, it's a choice between good men with differing good qualities. If I have to choose between two great guys, and with one of them I'm consistently unsatisfied sexually, well, he was probably eliminated last week anyway. :p


This sentence is the worst! They exist, therefore their existence is justified.

I have said over and over that there are women who could happily make micropenis work, even if I cannot. I bet the same holds for some men as well. Just the fact that something is outside of my experience or desires does not render it irrelevant or undesireable to someone else, maybe even hundreds of millions of someones else. Your posts imply the opposite. And what does it say about you as a man that you value anyone with a pe is more than all women? Do you notice your writing demonizes women who can't get off outside of a specific size range, PURELY because they are physically incapable of doing it, solely so some hypothetical men don't feel badly about themselves. You make these determinations about what all good women can learn to enjoy without ever having experienced a clitoral orgasm" any kind of vaginal orgasm, having never felt a delightful dicking down of your own sensational snatch. Just blind, sweeping, paternalistic assertions. That's disgusting to me. Do you realize the misogyny in that? You'd best check yourself, Sir.

A more egalitarian approach is to recognize the validity of each man's need to feel loved and desired, AND the validity of each person knowing and pursuing only that which is compatible according to their own needs and values. That is the difference between what you are saying, and what I have been saying.


Really? Have you never heard of asexuals? They seem pretty happy when no one is pressuring them to conform to another sexual expression.:eek:


Are you really comparing men with small dicks to asexuals?
Best check myself? You mean my privilege? My white male privilege? I find that funny.

I'm not demonizing anyone. I'm merely complaining about women, and men too. The quote in Donnie Darko goes like this, Donnie Darko points out that the smurfs have no dicks or vaginas and Donnie Darko says "It is not realistic, If you don't have a dick, what is the point?"

Also what I'm saying is a man with a small dick could live out his existence, if he freed himself from "wanting to be loved and desired" as you say, if he instead did the desiring. The quest for a man wanting to have a bigger dick is a quest to be a tool for a woman's pleasure, he wants a bigger dick so he can better serve the woman. If he thought in terms of what he wants and not what she wants, he would be able to live under perhaps any circumstance. And maybe people like Koji wouldn't live out their existence in utter misery.
 

AlteredEgo

Mythical Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2006
Posts
19,175
Media
37
Likes
26,255
Points
368
Location
Hello (Sud-Ouest, Burkina Faso)
Sexuality
No Response
Best check myself? You mean my privilege? My white male privilege? I find that funny.
Are you putting words in my mouth, Son? I'm from the Bronx. While my lexicon is broad, urban slang is certainly in the mix. Check yourself. As in, "You better check yourself before you weck yourself." As in, examine what you're saying and doing. Check YOURSELF. YOURSELF. Had I wanted to admonish you to check your privilige, I would have. I am quite good at conversing in English, despite the occasional uncaught typo.

The quest for a man wanting to have a bigger dick is a quest to be a tool for a woman's pleasure, he wants a bigger dick so he can better serve the woman.
Even gay ones?

I'm not demonizing anyone. I'm merely complaining about women, and men too.
Liar. Here. A refresher course.
I used to talk with a man who wished he was never born every day of his life because a woman shamed him for the size of his penis. It might seem comical to some people, but if you had some empathy you wouldn't laugh.

What about getting penetrated by the right size penis is so necessary? I'm less inclined that giving it up is a "big sacrifice" and more inclined to believe that many women are spoiled.
Women are spoiled and a tad disgusting.
Show me where you have written the equivalent about men. Nevermind. You have not.
Also what I'm saying is a man with a small dick could live out his existence, if he freed himself from "wanting to be loved and desired" as you say, if he instead did the desiring. The quest for a man wanting to have a bigger dick is a quest to be a tool for a woman's pleasure, he wants a bigger dick so he can better serve the woman. If he thought in terms of what he wants and not what she wants, he would be able to live under perhaps any circumstance. And maybe people like Koji wouldn't live out their existence in utter misery.
If he won't consider what she wants, he doesn't deserve her. That (and the reverse) goes for any he, and any she involved with each other, or seeking to be involved with each other.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1019487
6

693987

Guest
Look, I know you're obsessed with the whole dick size thing, but

what

To think that Japan's low birth rates have anything to do with penis size and not to do with broader cultural issues (namely: its intense work culture) is pretty fuckin ludicrous

Birth rates are declining in a LOT of first world countries. A silly amount of people, especially on this site, like to just point at Japan and say it's because of penis size :rolleyes:

Google Scholar check declining birth rates and it's in a lot of places, with actual cited sources, even. Heck, even though I take anything from wikipedia with a hefty dose of salt, cited source of the United Nations is demonstrating an overall world trend towards lower birth rates since at least the 1950s.
 

The Meat Rod Cometh

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Jun 9, 2017
Posts
1,220
Media
20
Likes
2,769
Points
258
Location
Boise (Idaho, United States)
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Look, I know you're obsessed with the whole dick size thing, but

what

To think that Japan's low birth rates have anything to do with penis size and not to do with broader cultural issues (namely: its intense work culture) is pretty fuckin ludicrous
Birth rates are declining in a LOT of first world countries. A silly amount of people, especially on this site, like to just point at Japan and say it's because of penis size :rolleyes:

Google Scholar check declining birth rates and it's in a lot of places, with actual cited sources, even. Heck, even though I take anything from wikipedia with a hefty dose of salt, cited source of the United Nations is demonstrating an overall world trend towards lower birth rates since at least the 1950s.

The truth is there is a great conspiracy under way. Small penises will soon rule the world.
All big cocks will be hunted down to extinction. RUUUUNNNN!
 

TooMuchInternet

Expert Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2014
Posts
83
Media
22
Likes
139
Points
43
Location
Harrisonburg City (Virginia, United States)
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
What if I said if a woman doesn
If he won't consider what she wants, he doesn't deserve her. That (and the reverse) goes for any he, and any she involved with each other, or seeking to be involved with each other.

What your saying is basically this: A man has a penis that is too small for the woman. What she wants is him to have a bigger penis. Not a strap-on not a dildo, a penis. So because he has a small penis he doesn't deserve her. It is a pretty cruel statement.

Turn that around. A woman has small tits, the man wants her to have larger tits. Not fake silicon titties, real full breasts. She doesn't deserve him because she has small tits. Ask yourself what that man really deserves. Ask yourself what the woman in the previous example really deserves.

I've read some of these posts and it is interesting to compare the woman's wants with the man's "A woman wants sexual pleasure." "The man wants to start a family." Whose wants are more noble? It doesn't matter.

It is not about what you deserve. If everyone got what they deserved, perhaps we would all be punished. It takes a certain quality, I think it is called "audacity" to take what you don't deserve and enjoy it anyway.
 
6

693987

Guest
I know more gay dudes who have dick size requirements than women. Astronomically so. Yet you aren't trying to tell gay dudes what to do, or that they can just learn to enjoy sex another way. Interesting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlteredEgo

AlteredEgo

Mythical Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2006
Posts
19,175
Media
37
Likes
26,255
Points
368
Location
Hello (Sud-Ouest, Burkina Faso)
Sexuality
No Response
The quest for a man wanting to have a bigger dick is a quest to be a tool for a woman's pleasure, he wants a bigger dick so he can better serve the woman.
It was unfair of me to be flippant earlier. I should address this for real because of the scope of the potential audience. The quest for a bigger dick has little to do with women. Women often indicate that as long as a penis falls within a fairly wide range, or is about average in size, the specific size is of little import. Meanwhile, many of the men on various P.E. fora expressly write that the are with women who want them to stop enhancing, who ate uncomfortable with how much they have pumped, for example, because it is now too big for pleasure, and yet they still would prefer to be even bigger. The "quest" is about impressing other men, or feeling privately superior to other men. This business of having a big-bigger-biggest mentality is nearly entirely a male thing.