pokjbv: For what is worth, in ancient pagan cultures, there were statues in the houses that had phalluses that were enormous and guests were expected to rub these when they entered, they were fertility icons and also put the right ideas into the heads of the guests. The ideal of the middle ages was different, it was dictated by the church and had sculptors wanted to use larger genitals they would not have gotten approval, that is David might have had a big one but the pope did not allow it. They were lucky to get any genitals shown at all. The ancient Greek statues that survive, and Roman, do so because the esthetic quality of the sculpture outwieghed the pornographic qualities in the eyes of the authorities that have had jurisdiction since then. The fact is that if you look at the paintings on pots from Greece you see many a penis, and some are huge and frankly sexual. Think of the art that has been vandalized and destroyed just because the penis was too large for comfort!
As far as small ones go, they do look odd I suppose. But, I am gay, I don't spend as much time looking as I do touching, and they are no more odd than big ears, or little hands. For me there are two things that really count about a guy, his smile and how often he uses it, and the integrity of his heart and mind.
In this thread you touch on the basis of LPSG. Size. I should start a thread that asks for a difinative and intelligent discussion of size. I have been to all the boards, and most of the threads and there are many nagging points, and questions about what constitutes large or small. It is relative, but is there a faction here that has had statistics and can discuss the bell curve? We all know our own size, and we all know what we like, but are there men that want to make a well educated discussion that can quantify it? Example, a man here with 12 inches looks down on a guy with only 9.5 inches, but in absolute terms a guy with 8 is large and outside of the average norm. Yet again there are statistically bound to be men with the fabeled 14 or 16 inches. I once had a lover with 3 inches, what would he make of all this?
This has the potential to be the most interesting thread, and it is at the core of why this site and 10,000 others exist, along with a lot of human behavior which can be aborant in the extreme. If we can exclude a lot of anacdotal evidence and concentrate on just figuring out what is large, and what is less, then we might figure out why men with smaller dicks are so threatened by us. Or, why we are so sought after by people that cannot possibly have any other interest in us than the huge honker between our legs. We might also find out why some are larger than others, genetics sure, but that is not the whole answer. There has to be more.
Meanwhile, it strikes me as wrong to speculate on the esthetic quality of a dick just for it's size, have you not all had enough of that? You should have seen my Dennis, 5 inches, but the prettiest five inches of real estate in cockopia. I do not wish to censor, never, but I hope you can also be kind in your speculation.
