SurferGirlCA said:The fact that you're still trying to surf the Atlantic suddenly makes everything else you have to say make perfect sense. Good luck with that! :tongue:
*laughs and falls out of chair*
SurferGirlCA said:The fact that you're still trying to surf the Atlantic suddenly makes everything else you have to say make perfect sense. Good luck with that! :tongue:
SurferGirlCA said:The fact that you're still trying to surf the Atlantic suddenly makes everything else you have to say make perfect sense. Good luck with that! :tongue:
transformer_99 said:Hey, don't read more into the "for 36 yo", than is there, that came from knowledge of you being 36, you let the cat of the bag on that one.
I don't understand what "cat" you're referring to . . .
Besides, How many others have said you are hot/hard bodied that had no earthly clue of your age, which might be a reason that part was omitted ?
That's exactly my point which you seem to keep missing. Unless the gentlemen prefers younger women, my age is irrelevant. There was no omission. I specifically mentioned that was the case for a few of the men i've met, not the majority. The few who made that statement to me happened to be over 40. I'll repeat myself: this was an observation. The last younger man made his compliment before he asked my age, FWIW.
Besides, there's a double standard floating around too on that, you don't know how many times I've heard that from a mid-twenty somethings in reference to myself.
I think if anyone's let the cat out of the proverbial bag, it's you. :tongue: I've no doubt this happens to men who are dating younger women as well. Idiocy knows no boundaries, including those of gender.
No it's called nitpicking and thinking that one post or a few is a consummate stance, especially since otherwise has been explained in subsequent posts. I don't think your posts are all inclusive of your thoughts even your best attempts at expressing them, but it is what we have to read and filter for. I don't know how many times something was rewritten and then later submitted that still wasn't misinterpreted by someone, causing an uproar by someone looking for an opportunity. Case in point, what do you gather from this without analyzing it, reading and rereading it several times ?
LOL. Where was I nitpicking? Please show me. This is why we often ask others on this board to explain themselves in greater detail, so we can all understand one another better with every post.
she was 37 and I was 17 and 19 and 30
and that's not to pick on the guys post, but just an example for you. I read it and was confused.
I've no idea what you're talking about here.
Nice smiley, but that thread was posted in the Funny Stuff, humor/joke section. It was the title of thread as I recall, if it so offended you, you had to know going into the thread that the potential for something being unflattering might exist. Tactlessness is a matter of opinion, sophomoric humor is what it is, why would you take a joke seriously ? Is that part of this literacy you spoke of earlier ?
I thought it was unimaginative, sexist, and pointless, but I wasn't really interested enough to be offended.
Tactlessness is a matter of (sometimes public) opinion and you admitting to being tactless earlier, remember?
And it would appear I'm not the only one ?
What, pray tell, was I generalizing about?
davidjh7 said:I'm glad you are straight, Transformer.
davidjh7 said:I'm glad you are straight, Transformer.
davidjh7 said:Good--then we finally agree on something