Klingsor
Worshipped Member
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2011
- Posts
- 10,888
- Media
- 4
- Likes
- 11,638
- Points
- 293
- Location
- Champaign (Illinois, United States)
- Sexuality
- 80% Straight, 20% Gay
- Gender
- Male
Gotta love Rush. He's all up in arms about people who "want to have sex without consequences."
Guess he wants women to just shut up and get pregnant, like the good old days.
Four More Advertisers Ditching Rush Limbaugh | ThinkProgress
"In total, this makes 26 advertisers who have taken steps to end ads on Limbaughs show since last week."
Non sequitur (logic) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
It takes considerable ignorance to believe that anyone here is unaware of that fact. But then, if your understanding of the term "left wing" is shifted as far to the right as terms like "socialist" are shifted in the speech of self-described conservatives of today (a use of terms under which, e.g., President Eisenhower comes out as a leftie), then what you say is indeed not widely known, but also not true.
This is such silly and puerile paranoid nonsense that I can't bring myself to give it a serious reply. Maybe someone else will.
A "plant"? How is she a "plant"? Apparently, you agree with Darrel Issa that a hearing on the coverage of female contraception by insurance policies is a process in which only celibate Catholic clergymen can give testimony and in which women have no business.
If your claims have a basis in fact, provide it.
All actions have consequences.........if you take the chance of having sex without protection you deal with the consequences. But don't make it my or anybody else's problem if you get prego or sick. If you don't want to get prego or sick and still have sex, figure out a way to pay for your own protection. Last time I checked condoms were cheap and in some cases (planned parenthood) free, and Birth control was relatively cheap. So instead of buying that Ipod or data plan to go with your fancy iphone or night out at the bar.....you should have invested in some sort of sex protection for yourself.
Sandra Fluke is "really" 30 years old: how is this supposed to be relevant to anything? When did she ever claim to be of any other age? A transcript of her testimony can be read here. At no point does she say how old she is. Apparently there were some people who thought that she was 23 years old (which would be unusually young for a third-year law student). Your view apparently is that if someone makes erroneous statements about a person's age, the person whose age has been misstated is somehow discredited.SWEET.....we have a winner!!!
Here's a link to the "plant" issue
Sandra Fluke Is Really 30 Years Old And Went to Georgetown Knowing Contraception Wasn’t Covered | Video | TheBlaze.com
Granted most on this board will probably dismiss the story because of the source, but if you look at the links and articles the story does reference.....makes you wonder.
I can see no coherent argument in this babble of yours and don't understand what it is supposed to mean--not that I care. You have given compelling evidence of one fact only: that you are a loudly braying jackass.Nice reference of Wiki......
On Rush's backers.....its call reactionary policies. Its like when that commentator said "chink in armor" headline with ESPN. Who own's ESPN? Disney, they will do whatever it takes to protect business. So when something could be taking out of context or see as offensive....just get rid of it. Don't ask quesitons.....just fix it. You know that the author of that headline is also married to an asia woman, right? Must be a huge racist
To me it seems as your view of what is left and right wing is so far to the left you thing fascists are right wing.
And as far as my "paranoid nonsense", who are the ones protecting the democrats? Or won't question the presidents policies? Who are the biggest contributors to the democratic/leftist parties?
Four More Advertisers Ditching Rush Limbaugh | ThinkProgress
"In total, this makes 26 advertisers who have taken steps to end ads on Limbaugh’s show since last week." ....
lmao...So what Maher, Schultz and every other Leftist/Marxist/Communist/Socialist commentator says about people of the right, middle america, or any other Conservative that speaks up is ok?
I hate to break it to most on this board, but the left wing is the minority in this country. But seeing as they make up the most of news commentators, opinion writers, college professors, etc. they control the message. And will "beat down" any opposition opinion, but when one of their own does something that they accuse the right of doing they look the other way.....or call it a "distraction".
Once the left treats their own like they do the right.......they need to get off their high hypocritical horse.
FYI......Miss Fluke was a plant by the democrats on that day, just to cause mis-direction and change the big news stories of the day or week. She mis-represented herself during her little presentation, she's actually 30 and apply to Georgetown, not for the education....but to change their policies. Instead of finding an institution that shared her values...she decided to go to one she didn't agree with and change it.
It *is* your problem if people get pregnant or sick--unwanted children and costly medical issues are a problem for society as a whole.
The question is, are we going to acknowledge that connection and work as a society to address these issues--or will we remain stuck in a myopic "not my problem" mode?
Perhaps my favorite post on this site. Thank you for applying logic to the discussion.
lmao...
Get rid of all Anti-People Politicians this November!
Get up off your tired asses and register to vote and VOTE.
OBAMA/BIDEN.....2012
Ok, so lets take your idea to the logical conclusion:
Mandatory, ENFORCED, surgically reversible sterilization for EVERYONE until they:
* Are at least 18 years old
* Graduate school
* Demonstrate they have at least a certain amount of intelligence and respect for others
* Prove they have marketable skills and desire to be a productive member of society
That way society won't have to worry about unwanted children.
And by "logical conclusion," of course, you mean ridiculous extreme.
http://images.sodahead.com/profiles/0/0/0/3/2/8/1/3/5/women-70902225570.jpeg
So if Miss Fluke wants her college's health insurance to pay for her contraception, because its her basic human right. Can I ask for my homeowner's insurance to supply me with a gun because its one of my rights, second amendment?
Contraception is part of women's health, and thus should be covered by insurance. It is one of the reasons why people pay for health insurance, and health insurance is part of college fees.
Owning a gun is not part of owning a home. Gun owners are a "minority in this country."
If you're going to make arguments, at least present plausible ones.