B_VinylBoy
Sexy Member
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2007
- Posts
- 10,363
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 70
- Points
- 123
- Location
- Boston, MA / New York, NY
- Sexuality
- 90% Gay, 10% Straight
- Gender
- Male
I don't think it's marijuana that's keeping California's jails full.
What's staggering is that it costs over $50,000/ head to keep people in jail in CA, compared to $10-20,000 in all the Southern states - who's creaming off the system?
In Your State: Prison Costs . NOW on PBS
I think taxpayers should be a little more concerned with that!
$30,000 less spent * 171,000 inmates = $5.1 Billion savings!
That's more than the revenue they'd make in 10 years taxing the herb.
That's not an honest statistic for that kind of argument.
Marijuana possession is one of the top five reasons for arrest in this country. Its overall impact on our jail system and population is more than apparent. I provided a link stating this earlier in this thread.
We'd expect the prices of prisons in states like California and New York to be higher than most southern states just on the simple fact that the cost of living is much higher in these areas. In some twisted sense, people in prison can be financially measured on the same everyday necessities as free civilians. Food, water, electricity, heat, health, etc... it all applies. If states like California are supposed to simply drop their costs per inmate, then how do they do it without reducing the living conditions of inmates to be anymore barbaric than it already is? As much as we want to think of prisoners as ingrates who deserve no sympathy or rights, that doesn't give us the right to treat them like animals once they are detained.
SoYouWanna The ten most expensive U.S. cities to live in | SoYouWanna.com
America's 5 Most and Least Expensive Cities
Legalizing marijuana will eliminate a lot of arrests and cut down on crime rates, thereby saving the state a lot of money for Prison costs. Plus, revenue from marijuana can be taxed on the same levels of cigarettes which means even more money for the state. Over time, that would benefit a state more than just cutting the cost per inmate. Besides, where's the savings if you have one inmate in jail at $50K a year versus three potheads at $20K a year?
Last edited: