Originally posted by jonb@Apr 17 2005, 09:02 PM
Well, also, people don't expect women to do it, and they expect men to want it. So they confuse sexual attraction to a younger male with maternal attachment.
Problems associated with sexual abuse of a boy by a woman tend to be far less than when men sexually abuse children of either sex (I don't have any consistent stats on lesbian abuses, but it's so rare no one can get a good sample size.), but the biggie's gender identity disorder, since females are traditionally expected to be passive.
[post=301567]Quoted post[/post]
JonB, I'm starting to think I'm singling you a lot? I actually enjoy what you say and you bring tremendously important perspective to many things I've been reading on this forum. I'm learning a lot from others as well, but for whatever reason, you inspire me to speak (and I hope that's a good thing).
Forgive me here for a bit as I differ right now. This isn't personal either, but your comment gives me the chance to do some podium pounding, figuratively speaking.
It is only an assumption that victims of female-perpetrated sexual abuse suffer less than from male-perpetrated abuse. It is a very complicated topic and I don't have the links available, but there has been recent (finally!

studies that are beginning to show that boys who were sexually abused, by males or females, can end up with enduring problems just like girls. It's understandable, but a lot of the problems with dealing adequately with childhood sexual abuse are the nearly overwhelming myths about victims and perpetrators, not limited to gender assumptions.
Also, same-sex sexual abuse is not "gay" abuse nor "lesbian" abuse, in the same sense that a male pedophile who molests girls (or a female pedophile who molests boys) is a "heterosexual" abuse. Sexual abuse is not about orientation, nor gender.
Sorry for the rant, but it is a vitally important issue to me.
Gender Identity Disorder: that's a different issue and much more complex, but I don't think GID has anything to do with sexual abuse. Women can be, and are, aggressive. Many people do not believe women are necessarily passive by definition or design, only by convenience. Men aren't always aggressive either, men can also be passive. Saying this also presumes - if I can extrapolate the comment this far - that only men are inherently capable to be sexual abusers because they are more "aggressive." Assuming somebody may have a personality or mood disorder, doesn't mean they'll become a sexual predator. There are a lot of tremendously confusing and overlapping issues here and a lot of them are based on how we perceive or define gender identity, orientation, sexuality issues, and power/control dynamics, to name just a couple here.