Tremaine
Cherished Member
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2006
- Posts
- 209
- Media
- 8
- Likes
- 274
- Points
- 218
- Location
- Liverpool (England)
- Sexuality
- 69% Gay, 31% Straight
- Gender
- Male
Anything that appears in nature, it is per definition 'natural'.
It's not 'normal', however, because most people aren't gay.
You are getting confused here.
Natural means that it happens in nature when left to itself unfettered by outside influence.
Normal used where the majority do or do not do something is referring to the norm - by the use of this term, it is normal to have an average IQ , i.e. between 90 and 110. Therefore I with an IQ in the region of 150 am by definition ab-normal, I am outside of the norm. But averages are just that, it does not mean that those or that which lies outside of the 'norm' are un-natural.
Most people are not particularly bright or intelligent it does not mean that they should or that we would wish them to be stoned, (although at times I can think of some exceptions to that :tongue
It could be thus argued that because the average length of a man's penis is around 6 inches that all those with one at the extreme of length as represented by this forum, should be put down as being un-natural. Would that be fair, would it be right, would it be just? I venture to suggest that it would not.
Why is it that there are those who would decry those who are not inclined to pro-create and yet if there is anything about them that lies outside of the norm, at the extremes of a normal distribution hold it up as a facet of themselves or yet as a virtue.
Viva la differance - life and society is all the better for it.