Sometimes I scare myself.

[Shelby]

Here's an absurdity to ponder.

Studies have determined that the average gay male has a slightly larger penis than his straight counterpart. One would assume that gays reproduce at a slower rate than straights. So is the penis doomed by evolution to eventually shrink into nothingness?

*hits the bong again*

 

[B_Stronzo]

** pass me that bong. That's some good shit you've got there.

 

[Matthew]

:bongsmi:

 

[GoneA]

:bongsmi:

at:

 

[D_alex8]

at:

:eck19:

 

[windtalkerways]

* Tries to see through the purple haze*

But there are probably enough gay guys
who don't figure out or admit their true
leanings until after having a couple kiddies,
to keep the schlongs going.

 

[madame_zora]

Here's an absurdity to ponder.

Studies have determined that the average gay male has a slightly larger penis than his straight counterpart. One would assume that gays reproduce at a slower rate than straights. So is the penis doomed by evolution to eventually shrink into nothingness?

*hits the bong again*

Alright Bogie, pass it over.

What studies? I haven't seen those but I'd like to. This is actually a subject of some interest to me, unfortunately enough.

*double hits bong before passing it back*

 

[Shelby]

Alright Bogie, pass it over.

What studies? I haven't seen those but I'd like to. This is actually a subject of some interest to me, unfortunately enough.

*double hits bong before passing it back*

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=10410197&query_hl=12&itool=pubmed_docsum

 

[Dr Rock]

your logic is faulty - the assumption that all the "big dick" genes come from the male progenitors is clearly false

 

[dolf250]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=10410197&query_hl=12&itool=pubmed_docsum

Now that I have read some of the related articles I believe that I can now spot a homosexual at 100 paces. He will have a larger cock than average, be left handed, will be the second, third or fourth born (certainly not the first or the last) will have a lower quality of life (the article says it is due to a lower self-esteem) and will have their second and fourth fingers close to the same length. All previous observations are based on "scientific research."
**After comparing the scientific results to myself I now find I need to change my straight to gay ratio…until just now I had mistakenly considered myself straight.:biggrin1:**

 

[Chuck64]

He will have a larger cock than average, be left handed, will be the second, third or fourth born (certainly not the first or the last) will have a lower quality of life (the article says it is due to a lower self-esteem) and will have their second and fourth fingers close to the same length.

I don't match that description at all.

Yes! Thank you Jesus! I'm straight! :smile:

My parents will be so thoroughly confused they'll never speak to me again. Boy. This just keeps getting better and better. :biggrin1:

 

[madame_zora]

Oh that old used up tripe, I thought you meant something new. Prenatal hormonal levels....I dunno. I thing the genes are already determined by then, I don't think prenatal care specifically affects dick size. People are always fishing here, and while I enjoy hearing their speculations, I rarely hear anything that sounds like much more than a bunch of scientific types beating off.

 

[D_Humper E Bogart]

I'm a scientific type, don't I get the option of beating off as well?

As for the whole "gay" issue. There are lots of other things people could dig into that would be of far greater interest.

After all, a correlation between dick size and gayness would mean that having a large dick makes you gay, and as mentioned, where'd all the other large dicks come from?

Human biology is extrememly complicated, heck, just been taught there are plants that have more genes than we do. So what are "they" using it for then?

 

[Sergeant_Torpedo]

Maybe gay guys try harder. Try harder at proving their superiority - thought that was called facism not gayness.

 

[D_alex8]

Human biology is extrememly complicated, heck, just been taught there are plants that have more genes than we do. So what are "they" using it for then?

Gay plants

 

[D_alex8]

Maybe gay guys try harder. Try harder at proving their superiority - thought that was called facism not gayness.

If maintaining visibility to counter social stereotyping and ghettoisation is equivalent to fascism in your book, then you have a slightly skewed view of the world.

 

[Shelby]

Only Dr. Rock speaks intelligently.

 

[Dr Rock]

Maybe gay guys try harder. Try harder at proving their superiority - thought that was called facism not gayness.

maybe you should try harder at proving that you have one or more brain cells lurking somewhere in your big fat head

 

[Matthew]

Only Dr. Rock speaks intelligently.

The rest of us are too stoned.

 

[D_Humper E Bogart]

Remember, if you rape you'll get 3 years, but DON'T YOU EVER BE DOING DRUGS!

Anyway, I don't see how penile size equates lineraly to gayness, especially when they're different aspects. I can't remember who did the sliding scale of 1-5 where 1 was mainly hetero 5 mainly homo, but then you'd have to plot a penile size scale while avoiding any bias (I'm sure the gays in Chenobyl must have a reaaaaal good time!).

I should have done this sort of crap for my project.