squirting orgasm discussion for all

[B_Hickboy]

Ah, this has quit being fun. So many hurt feelings.

 

[Tattooed Goddess]

Well I do feel like this, you ARE saying I AM pissing myself when I have a squirting orgasm because you haven't had one and all scientific evidence says I shouldn't be able to do so (regardless of a skeen gland or no)that it MUST be some urinary-based-liquid Because we should ALL think LIKE YOU DO-
The girl is pissing herself! She doesn't know what she's talking about!

Correct me if I'm simplifying this wrong!!!

By the way, I still say, I know my body well enough to know the difference and you insisting otherwise is insulting my intellegence.

You've been incredibly defensive since you stepped into this thread. It wasn't just about experience but also others wanting some proof physically how it is possible. It's obvious some people don't care to know how it is possible, but those who have never known anyone to experience it would like to know, even if you can't give the scientific information to us....someone sure can. And no one is putting the pressure on you to reveal your sources until you say it was only 1% urine. That's a pretty detailed percentage about the fluid to not know how you came up with it, that's what people were razzing you about because we are trying to get further with this debate than just "I can do it".

Those stories are appreciated but some people ARE going to question where you are getting your facts. You were presuming people were singling you out and insulting your intelligence. When in fact, my intelligence is minimal in the presence of squirting woman....your intelligence is minimal with Anatomy and Physiology. We were each educating us on something as far as I was concerned.

I feel as if you are taking this far too personally as if we are specifically referring to you in examples given thus far. When we are indeed not. This is going pretty much run of the mill debate for LPSG Women's Issues like it has been for many years now. This was even before you registered, so the way you are feeling is not because we are trying to make you feel that way.

No one doubts your experience. We just doubt where this fluid is coming from and what it is comprised of. As those two things will give us a more definitive answer in this debate. You were the one throwing out some chemical percentages and the two people who are pretty well known for breaking things down to the meat and potatoes asked you for some links to that information. That was not insulting, nor intended to insult you personally.

I get asked that as well and so do many others by the same people. It's not something you need to be taking personally. No one here thinks you are stupid or lying.

QuietMan needs to take off his Knight in Shining Armour for 56 minutes or so to go back and get a refresher on this thread. He might want to multi-quote when he responds so the proper quotes are associated with the actual member who said them, rather than ganging up on me as a way to defend your delicate sensibilities.

Things aren't always as they seem, sometimes we all are guilty of bringing a little insecurity with us on a topic we feel strongly about. But trust me when I say that no one here today was insulting you. Me or anyone else that I've been reading thus far.

 

[Tattooed Goddess]

Ah, this has quit being fun. So many hurt feelings.

I concur. I'm taking my skateboard over to another thread. This one has worn me out more an a squirting orgasm ever could!

 

[HariSeldon]

Too bad she'll probably never see this. I know how frustrating it can be to deal with an incredibly frustrating tool like Mademoiselle Rouge. She screams "science" yet offers no sources. Here's what wikipedia has to say.

"Critics have maintained that ejaculation is either stress incontinence or vaginal lubrication. Research in this area has concentrated almost exclusively on attempts to prove that the ejaculate is not urine,[43][63] measuring substances such as urea, creatinine, prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP), prostate specific antigen (PSA),[6] glucose and fructose [64] levels. Early work was contradictory; the initial study on one woman by Addiego and colleagues reported in 1981,[30] could not be confirmed in a subsequent study on 11 women in 1983, [65] but was confirmed in another 7 women in 1984.[66] In 1985 a different group studied 27 women, and found only urine,[46] suggesting that results depend critically on the methods used.
A 2007 study on two women involved ultrasound, endoscopy, and biochemical analysis of fluid. The ejaculate was compared to pre-orgasmic urine from the same woman, and also to published data on male ejaculate. In both women, higher levels of PSA, PAP, and glucose but lower levels of creatinine were found in the ejaculate than the urine. PSA levels were comparable to those in males."

There is obviously something else going on.

 

[B_Hickboy]

Too bad she'll probably never see this. I know how frustrating it can be to deal with an incredibly frustrating tool like Mademoiselle Rouge. She screams "science" yet offers no sources. Here's what wikipedia has to say.

"Critics have maintained that ejaculation is either stress incontinence or vaginal lubrication. Research in this area has concentrated almost exclusively on attempts to prove that the ejaculate is not urine,[43][63] measuring substances such as urea, creatinine, prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP), prostate specific antigen (PSA),[6] glucose and fructose [64] levels. Early work was contradictory; the initial study on one woman by Addiego and colleagues reported in 1981,[30] could not be confirmed in a subsequent study on 11 women in 1983, [65] but was confirmed in another 7 women in 1984.[66] In 1985 a different group studied 27 women, and found only urine,[46] suggesting that results depend critically on the methods used.
A 2007 study on two women involved ultrasound, endoscopy, and biochemical analysis of fluid. The ejaculate was compared to pre-orgasmic urine from the same woman, and also to published data on male ejaculate. In both women, higher levels of PSA, PAP, and glucose but lower levels of creatinine were found in the ejaculate than the urine. PSA levels were comparable to those in males."

There is obviously something else going on.

"Early work was contradictory"..."initial study on one woman by Addiego and colleagues reported in 1981,[30] could not be confirmed in a subsequent study on 11 women in 1983"..."was confirmed in another 7 women"

Why wasn't a sample of post-orgasmic urine collected from the two women? How can anybody know that the 'ejaculate' wasn't identical in composition to the women's urine at the moment of orgasm?

Do you consider two people, or a group of seven, a respectable sample size?

There isn't much "SCIENCE" to be seen here.

I'm going to stand in the frustrating toolshed.

 

[paigexox]

Ah, this has quit being fun. So many hurt feelings.

Quick, hurt mine! I am feeling left out here!

 

[B_Hickboy]

Quick, hurt mine! I am feeling left out here!

fuck off.

 

[over6inchgirth]

every girl I've been with has squirted every time... Idon't normally tell them about it till after they have done it because I don't want them having any expectations... However, all of them have told me they enjoy it very much. I think it may have to do with my thickness, so if you want to try it your self place constent preasure on you g-spot and relax, definately try it by yourself and then you'll know if you like it or his friends were just lying to him

 

[B_Hickboy]

every girl I've been with has squirted every time... Idon't normally tell them about it till after they have done it because I don't want them having any expectations... However, all of them have told me they enjoy it very much. I think it may have to do with my thickness, so if you want to try it your self place constent preasure on you g-spot and relax, definately try it by yourself and then you'll know if you like it or his friends were just lying to him

You sure these weren't men? How many of them have you been with?

I know this, because I'm a man, and I squirt.

 

[snoozan]

Ladies, why are you trying to ruin these men's jack-off material by telling them squirting is urine? I mean, really, so unfair to them.

Look, if we're going to be good women here, we have to go along with every single porno stereotype and indulge every jack-off fantasy these men have without question.

Remember: the internet is for porn. These men are not coming here to have rational discussion with real women. They want strippers and prostitutes in text form.

 

[B_quiet_man]

Ladies, why are you trying to ruin these men's jack-off material by telling them squirting is urine? I mean, really, so unfair to them.

Do you really think anyone is jacking off to THIS thread?

Furthermore, haven't you noticed that several females here are speaking out in recognition of the reality of female ejaculation, and some males are speaking out against it?

The sad truth of the Female Ejaculation Deniers, is that they are dismissing the accounts of women who experience this phenomenon, and shaming them into believing they are incontinent during sex. The result being that it is women, not men, who are harmed by their blind ignorance and bigotry. It's a very anti-female, and anti-sex message, because female ejaculation is something that the women who experience it enjoy a lot, and they are essentially being told not to have this pleasure, because the Deniers adamantly insist that they are actually doing something considered socially "disgusting" - peeing in the bed.

All sense of reason and balanced argument has been lost in this thread now unfortunately, but here is a good read on the subject, for those still interested: -

Female ejaculation

 

[B_Hickboy]

Do you really think anyone is jacking off to THIS thread?

Furthermore, haven't you noticed that several females here are speaking out in recognition of the reality of female ejaculation, and some males are speaking out against it?

The sad truth of the Female Ejaculation Deniers, is that they are dismissing the accounts of women who experience this phenomenon, and shaming them into believing they are incontinent during sex. The result being that it is women, not men, who are harmed by their blind ignorance and bigotry. It's a very anti-female, and anti-sex message, because female ejaculation is something that the women who experience it enjoy a lot, and they are essentially being told not to have this pleasure, because the Deniers adamantly insist that they are actually doing something considered socially "disgusting" - peeing in the bed.

All sense of reason and balanced argument has been lost in this thread now unfortunately, but here is a good read on the subject, for those still interested: -

Female ejaculation

I read that article. Not credible. It doesn't cite any specific studies. No science there, either.

 

[B_Hickboy]

Do you really think anyone is jacking off to THIS thread?

Furthermore, haven't you noticed that several females here are speaking out in recognition of the reality of female ejaculation, and some males are speaking out against it?

The sad truth of the Female Ejaculation Deniers, is that they are dismissing the accounts of women who experience this phenomenon, and shaming them into believing they are incontinent during sex. The result being that it is women, not men, who are harmed by their blind ignorance and bigotry. It's a very anti-female, and anti-sex message, because female ejaculation is something that the women who experience it enjoy a lot, and they are essentially being told not to have this pleasure, because the Deniers adamantly insist that they are actually doing something considered socially "disgusting" - peeing in the bed.

All sense of reason and balanced argument has been lost in this thread now unfortunately, but here is a good read on the subject, for those still interested: -

Female ejaculation

Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!!

I was wondering when somebody would haul out "DENIERS"! You win!

You answer only the questions that allow you to continue to equivocate. If you want to debate, you have to bring some facts. All I see out of you is just a bunch of wishful thinking.

And no, nobody's jacking off. Honest, intelligent people will prevent this thread from becoming wank fodder.

 

[B_quiet_man]

Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!! Ding!!

Goodness me, what a great way to prove you are ridiculously immature.

Well done.

 

[B_Hickboy]

Goodness me, what a great way to prove you are ridiculously immature.

Well done.

Answer my fucking questions.

 

[B_quiet_man]

Answer my fucking questions.

That's not easy to do, seeing as you haven't asked me any.

But how about this? Seeing as you are so keen on "science", why don't you provide some studies that prove, absolutely conclusively, that Female Ejaculation never happens, and that it is only urine that is expelled?

Seeing as you won't find any, the matter remains open.

And that means you are both ignorant, and a bigot.

 

[B_Hickboy]

That's not easy to do, seeing as you haven't asked me any.

But how about this? Seeing as you are so keen on "science", why don't you provide some studies that prove, absolutely conclusively, that Female Ejaculation never happens, and that it is only urine that is expelled?

Seeing as you won't find any, the matter remains open.

And that means you are both ignorant, and a bigot.

I can't argue with an illiterate. I asked questions, and if you could read, you would understand what they are and respond. If you had anything intelligent to offer, you would. But you don't.

Do you not understand how fucking stupid it would be to develop a scientific test to prove that any event doesn't happen? There is a limitless range of unlikely events not happening right now in this big, wide universe. How the fuck would you go about testing scientifically for any of them?

You need to just shut the fuck up, flip your burgers, have your pint or your joint at the end of the day, and leave thinking to people who are equipped and qualified to do it.

You want to believe what you believe, without having a shred of evidence save a handful of third- and fourth-hand anecdotes. You cannot wish a thing into being, no matter how convincingly you see it faked on free porn sites.

Your labels don't apply, and in order for you to demean me with them, I have to buy into them. I don't respect you enough for that to happen, and I don't know you well enough to miss you if you fucked off and didn't come back.

 

[B_quiet_man]

You want to believe what you believe, without having a shred of evidence save a handful of third- and fourth-hand anecdotes. You cannot wish a thing into being, no matter how convincingly you see it faked on free porn sites.

On the contrary, I'm not someone that is inclined to believe things without evidence. However, I'm also not inclined to dismiss something because "science" is unable to explain it. Science currently has no understanding of how consciousness and free-will are possible, but I don't deny that I experience these things.

As I said earlier, my ex-gf had lots of ejaculatory orgasms. The liquid that came out didn't smell like urine. It also left a whitish stain on sheets afterwards.

It was clear she was really enjoying these orgasms when she had them.

I can't imagine how unhappy she would have been if I'd told her to stop doing it, because she was making an unnecessary mess, by repeatedly urinating all over the bed.

 

[B_Hickboy]

On the contrary, I'm not someone that is inclined to believe things without evidence. However, I'm also not inclined to dismiss something because "science" is unable to explain it. Science currently has no understanding of how consciousness and free-will are possible, but I don't deny that I experience these things.

As I said earlier, my ex-gf had lots of ejaculatory orgasms. The liquid that came out didn't smell like urine. It also left a whitish stain on sheets afterwards.

It was clear she was really enjoying these orgasms when she had them.

I can't imagine how unhappy she would have been if I'd told her to stop doing it, because she was making an unnecessary mess, and urinating all over the bed repeatedly.

You are still evading my questions.

You're just another Hickboy Question Evader.

 

[B_quiet_man]

You are still evading my questions.

You're just another Hickboy Question Evader.

You still haven't asked me any questions.

Unless you meant this : -

There is a limitless range of unlikely events not happening right now in this big, wide universe. How the fuck would you go about testing scientifically for any of them?

It was so far off topic I assumed it was meant as an irrelevant, rhetorical question.

Here is a question for you to answer, seeing as you're keen on them. Is there any scientific proof that female ejaculation never happens, and that what is expelled is only urine?

Answer away. Only Yes/No will do.