Squirting

6

693987

Guest
... I am not incontinent, good grief.

Yes, in porn it can be women urinating and playing it off as squirting. Yes, some people are into piss play. No, I don't think all of the times I've squirted/gushed that it was pee.
 

LaFemme

Mythical Member
Staff
Moderator
Verified
Gold
Platinum Gold
Joined
Aug 16, 2010
Posts
42,462
Media
2
Likes
39,384
Points
743
Location
Canada
Sexuality
90% Straight, 10% Gay
Gender
Female

Mercurygirl

Superior Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2012
Posts
3,528
Media
0
Likes
3,145
Points
148
Location
Island of Misfit Toys
Gender
Female
it can't be females wjaculating right? Everywhere I read it simply says that when a women squirts it is just her inability to urinate from all the excitement.

True or false?

Medical science, the medical community, have determined that in fact it is urine. The women who say they squirt something other than urine are delusional and or in denial.
 

AlteredEgo

Mythical Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2006
Posts
19,175
Media
37
Likes
26,237
Points
368
Location
Hello (Sud-Ouest, Burkina Faso)
Sexuality
No Response
Yes, I've read the ONE study conducted amongst SEVEN women.
In order validate any scientific experiment, it should be replicated to validate the results.
It might want to also consider a larger sample, tested multiple times.

If I recall correctly, what they found were compounds from urine, not actual urine. I'll wait with SK for a better study, and the reproduction of that better study. Until then, I'll continue to do what I do. Every time I go to wash sheets that don't smell like urine even days after sitting in my hamper after I've gushed in them, I think of the people here.
 

Serial Kisser

Legendary Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2009
Posts
3,276
Media
6
Likes
1,578
Points
258
Location
South of Sanity
Sexuality
No Response
It might want to also consider a larger sample, tested multiple times.
Exactly !!
I'm so tired of that ONE freaking study being shoved around as proof that it's urine.
It's been in women's magazines, men's magazines.
It's a terrible study!
It's not scientific. I teach science!
It's a minuscule sample size, it was repeated or replicated. It's terrible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlteredEgo

Mercurygirl

Superior Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2012
Posts
3,528
Media
0
Likes
3,145
Points
148
Location
Island of Misfit Toys
Gender
Female
It's urine, end of.

This isn't even up for debate as medical science has ruled. They even explained why the liquid may be less pungent than urine. It's because it hasn't been fully processed. In many cases it's urine that was released prematurely.

Through exhaustive study, lab tests, millions of examinations of females, millions of autopsies, NEVER have doctors or scientists ever found anything to support this mystery liquid and unexplained female "squirting" nonsense. This is simple a lie perpetuated by women who are obviously too embarrassed and or unwilling to admit that they will probably be wearing Depend undergarments sooner than they think. Which is a common thing as women age, that is, a lot of women have leaking issues.

Medical Science, facts, trumps your speculation, denial, and pride.
 

Serial Kisser

Legendary Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2009
Posts
3,276
Media
6
Likes
1,578
Points
258
Location
South of Sanity
Sexuality
No Response
It's urine, end of.

This isn't even up for debate as medical science has ruled. They even explained why the liquid may be less pungent than urine. It's because it hasn't been fully processed. In many cases it's urine that was released prematurely.

Through exhaustive study, lab tests, millions of examinations of females, millions of autopsies, NEVER have doctors or scientists ever found anything to support this mystery liquid and unexplained female "squirting" nonsense. This is simple a lie perpetuated by women who are obviously too embarrassed and or unwilling to admit that they will probably be wearing Depend undergarments sooner than they think. Which is a common thing as women age, that is, a lot of women have leaking issues.

Medical Science, facts, trumps your speculation, denial, and pride.
Oh, it's not up for debate? As people are here arguing it - that by definition does make it up for debate. Again ONE study of SEVEN women does not make it scientific. Sorry that hurts YOUR pride. They also used to say the world was flat and that the sun revolved around it.
Are you a doctor? Scientist? The end all be all of everything?
Have you ever squirted?
I can find a bigger sample of women on this site that they could be happy to test.
What's it to you anyway? You just enjoy being the bee in people's bonnet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jdoe86

oceancountyexpress

Experimental Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2015
Posts
17
Media
0
Likes
5
Points
13
Location
New Jersey
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
In my experience, and from what I've read and heard Researchers report on radio interviews as well, I believe it's urine. Premature urine makes sense to back up the absence of a urine "smell".

I agree on the opinion that women are just too embarrassed to say it's urine. It makes sense to me. But I'm not a scientist. I also believe in God. And there is no scientific proof he exists.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mercurygirl

Mercurygirl

Superior Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2012
Posts
3,528
Media
0
Likes
3,145
Points
148
Location
Island of Misfit Toys
Gender
Female
Oh, it's not up for debate? As people are here arguing it - that by definition does make it up for debate.

What I mean by that is it's a debate you can't win. As in, you have no clinical scientific evidence to support your argument and I do.

Again ONE study of SEVEN women does not make it scientific.

First, look up the word "scientific" ... OK, now that you know the definition you understand that it could be 1 women, or a headless midget for that matter, and still be considered scientific if science was employed to obtain the results.

You also fail to grasp the fact that the study you cite was comprised of 7 women, like yourself, who claimed to squirt. Using ultrasound doctors saw these women's bladders empty during this bogus female ejaculation. That is, 100% of the study group urinated. If just one would have done otherwise scientists, the medical community, would have pushed for further testing. But it turned out to be exactly what they always suspected. In all of the research, examinations, etc., nothing has ever been found that supports anything in the female anatomy that can produce that physical expulsion, that amount of liquid, that biology result, other than the bladder and urinary tract.

Sorry that hurts YOUR pride.

My pride isn't at stake here, after all, I'm not the one pissing myself.

They also used to say the world was flat and that the sun revolved around it.

This is true ... and then scientists discovered it was made of urine.

Are you a doctor? Scientist?

No, but neither are you. So why don't we leave it to the scientists and doctors.

The end all be all of everything?

If you insist.

Have you ever squirted?

No, thank god.

I can find a bigger sample of women on this site that they could be happy to test.

I wish you luck. And if just one of those women shoots something other that urine I suppose I'll owe you an apology. However past research indicates that's highly unlikely.

What's it to you anyway?

Truth.

This isn't personal. Just don't pee on my leg and tell me it's raining.

You just enjoy being the bee in people's bonnet

Bzzzzzzzzz

=]
 
  • Like
Reactions: oceancountyexpress