• Welcome To LPSG
    Welcome to LPSG.com. If you are here because you are looking for the most amazing open-minded fun-spirited sexy adult community then you have found the right place. We also happen to have some of the sexiest members you'll ever meet. Signup below and come join us.


Staggering Hypocrisy

D

deleted15807

Read it and Weep

The bottom line, then, is that the crusade against health reform has relied, crucially, on utter hypocrisy: Republicans who hate Medicare, tried to slash Medicare in the past, and still aim to dismantle the program over time, have been scoring political points by denouncing proposals for modest cost savings — savings that are substantially smaller than the spending cuts buried in their own proposals.


Op-Ed Columnist - Republicans and Medicare - NYTimes.com
And why the invertebrate democrats can't slam this fact home is astonishing.
 

B_VinylBoy

Banned
Joined
Nov 30, 2007
Posts
10,365
Likes
37
Points
123
Location
Boston, MA / New York, NY
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
It's not a question of why Democrats can't slam it... it's why they won't.
Even Howard Dean is calling out the Dems, saying they have absolutely no backbone. The previous president used reconciliation 5 times to pass major bills. Democrats have yet to do it once.

It's like they're too scared to seem pushy and domineering, trying so hard to pander that they can't get anything done. There's only so much you can do to try and be bipartisan. If none of the opposition wants to collaborate, do it yourself.
 

Sergeant_Torpedo

Experimental Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2006
Posts
1,351
Likes
17
Points
183
Location
UK
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
It isn't the money grasping elected representatives who are the problem, rather the lobby system itself. Why have a universal right to health care within the US when you can allow the hard working poor to linger and die in agony (not shroud waving, it happens now) when you can "import" fit people from the third world to do all your shitty work.
 

HazelGod

Sexy Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2006
Posts
7,158
Likes
26
Points
183
Location
The Other Side of the Pillow
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
It's because the Democratic party wears a mask of hypocrisy in selling its image of having the interest of the people at heart.

The truth is, DEM politicians are every bit as bought and paid for as their GOP counterparts...and their own re-elections are their top priority. Every one of them knows that voters aren't the key to re-election, sponsors are. Those deep pockets who can pay for PR machines and ad campaigns.

Are there exceptions to this general truth? Sure. I happen to believe Russ Feingold is the most honorable man in federal office. But the majority of them are self-interested whores who sold out to moneyed interests long ago to get to where they are now, and who aren't about to bite the hand that's fed them so well.

The reality is that our representative democracy stopped representing the people a long time ago.
 

maxcok

Sexy Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Posts
7,160
Likes
97
Points
83
Location
Elsewhere
Gender
Male
It's not a question of why Democrats can't slam it... it's why they won't.
Even Howard Dean is calling out the Dems, saying they have absolutely no backbone. The previous president used reconciliation 5 times to pass major bills. Democrats have yet to do it once.

I actually agreed with Dean when he said let the bill go down in flames. As it is now, it's mainly a pander to the middle class, doesn't cut costs nearly as much as it could, and is way too friendly to big insurance and big pharma. The notion that the Dems will come back a fix it later is absurd. Just like campaign finance reform, it will be whittled away until there's nothing left. Let the voters start screaming when nothing passes, and rightly blame the Republican obstructionists. Maybe that will get people's attention. Start the debate over, and this time shoot down the Teabaggers and other assorted crazies - like should have been done the first time. Don't stop until there's a public option.

It's like they're too scared to seem pushy and domineering, trying so hard to pander that they can't get anything done. There's only so much you can do to try and be bipartisan. If none of the opposition wants to collaborate, do it yourself.

I've said it before, the Dems (my people) are mostly pussies. Furthermore, while the Repubs are precision goosestepping the Dems can't even get in a wiggly line. 'Herding cats' never rang so true as it does now with the Democrats.
 

maxcok

Sexy Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Posts
7,160
Likes
97
Points
83
Location
Elsewhere
Gender
Male
It's because the Democratic party wears a mask of hypocrisy in selling its image of having the interest of the people at heart.

The truth is, DEM politicians are every bit as bought and paid for as their GOP counterparts...and their own re-elections are their top priority. Every one of them knows that voters aren't the key to re-election, sponsors are. Those deep pockets who can pay for PR machines and ad campaigns.

Are there exceptions to this general truth? Sure. I happen to believe Russ Feingold is the most honorable man in federal office. But the majority of them are self-interested whores who sold out to moneyed interests long ago to get to where they are now, and who aren't about to bite the hand that's fed them so well.

The reality is that our representative democracy stopped representing the people a long time ago.
Except for the distinction that the Dem's sponsors overall may not be quite as insidious as the Repub's, I couldn't agree more. Just thought you'd like to know that. :smile: Why I think nothing basically will change until there is meaningful campaign finance reform. Still don't have a clue how that could happen, short of a Constitutional Convention as some have suggested, but that seems even more unlikely than Congress policing itself. It's a self-perpetuating phenomenon.


and there are still a few more good guys and gals there.
 

B_VinylBoy

Banned
Joined
Nov 30, 2007
Posts
10,365
Likes
37
Points
123
Location
Boston, MA / New York, NY
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
I actually agreed with Dean when he said let the bill go down in flames. As it is now, it's mainly a pander to the middle class, doesn't cut costs nearly as much as it could, and is way too friendly to big insurance and big pharma. The notion that the Dems will come back a fix it later is absurd. Just like campaign finance reform, it will be whittled away until there's nothing left. Let the voters start screaming when nothing passes, and rightly blame the Republican obstructionists. Maybe that will get people's attention. Start the debate over, and this time shoot down the Teabaggers and other assorted crazies - like should have been done the first time. Don't stop until there's a public option.

I don't think we need to start over.
The bill is never going to be perfect the first time. Social Security wasn't. Medicare certainly wasn't either. Even these measures had to be adjusted over time. We have enough ideas between the House & Senate versions of the bill to put together something that can get us started, then we can add additional changes as we go along. All we have to do is enter reconciliation. That way, we can put in some of the House bill ideas (like the Public Option) into the Senate version, or take the best ideas from both and make one complete bill. You also eliminate the threat of the filibuster, which means all 41 Republicans can vote "No" in the Senate and it can still pass. :wink:

With 59 Democratic senators, we only need 51 of them. It would take 10 Senate Democrats to say no in order for this bill to not pass. There's supposed to be 8 fiscally conservative Dems in the Senate. Even if they all said no and convinced one of the other Democrats to side with them, that would end in a 50-50 tie and it would be up to Joe Biden to break it. And even though we all see him as a loose canon, just how loose is he? Most likely, he'd side with the Democrats here.

This would be a better way to go at things now, instead of starting over from scratch. I would have been fine with this back in August, but now it's overdue. If we started over now, it'll be yet another fiasco in the Senate and I don't think anyone of us want to see that again.

I've said it before, the Dems (my people) are mostly pussies.

No argument here. They can be pretty weak.

Furthermore, while the Repubs are precision goosestepping the Dems can't even get in a wiggly line. 'Herding cats' never rang so true as it does now with the Democrats.

I can only wonder if we had more people like Howard Dean, Al Grayson and perhaps even Ed Schultz on the Senate floor? But I digress...
 
Last edited:

HazelGod

Sexy Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2006
Posts
7,158
Likes
26
Points
183
Location
The Other Side of the Pillow
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
Maybe those in Washington from both sides of the aisle might do well to take note of what we did here in New Orleans

What? You elected the son of a previous mayor and brother of your sitting U.S. Senator?

Dynastic politics at its worst. As Einstein observed, insanity is performing the same act over and over again but expecting a different result.
Way to go, geniuses. :rolleyes:

Louisiana's is among the last of the political systems I would ever hold up as an example of how things should be.
 

maxcok

Sexy Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Posts
7,160
Likes
97
Points
83
Location
Elsewhere
Gender
Male
I don't think we need to start over.
The bill is never going to be perfect the first time. . .
No argument here.

Social Security wasn't. Medicare certainly wasn't either. Even these measures had to be adjusted over time. We have enough ideas between the House & Senate versions of the bill to put together something that can get us started,then we can add additional changes as we go along. . .

Here's where we start to diverge. I think 'over time' it's more likely to be weakened, esp. if the Repubs are in power, as eventually they will be. Those days of 'adjustment' I'm afraid are long gone. There was a much different political climate then, much more give and take. Now it's all give on one side, all take on the other.

. . . All we have to do is enter reconciliation. That way, we can put in some of the House bill ideas (like the Public Option) into the Senate version, or take the best ideas from both and make one complete bill. . .
Should I hold my breath? Not to be sarcastic, I'll be surprised if anything comes out I can wholeheartedly support; unless it significantly lower costs, does not cater to big insurance and big pharma, includes a public option or similar competitive mechanism, and seriously addresses the needs of the working poor without requiring them to purchase a plan from an insurance company. Those are my criteria, and I admit, it's a high bar.

Look, it's easy enough for political junkies like us to understand, but the public at large doesn't. All they know is they want something, and it's not happening. The public almost always blames the party in power, whether justified or not. Reconciliation will be seen as a dirty trick, and you can bet your sweet ass, the Pubs will sell it that way, even though they've done it plenty of times themselves. They don't have to tell the truth, they only have to get their folks to believe them. As we all know, their folks will believe just about any damn thing they're told. It's not a level playing field, and it's helpful to always remember that. I actually think if the bill failed due to Republican obstructionists, the general public might sit up and take notice for once. On the other hand, if they get what they consider a half-ass bill they will blame the Dems for pushing it through.

If we can lay the blame on the Repubs where it mostly belongs, it gives Obama with his new found firebelly a chance to go back after the crazies whom he allowed to seize control of the debate and the coverage last August. I also think if it's framed right, it would be a great mid-term campaign issue. It's a chance to educate the public, and ultimately get a better plan. If we put through a better plan, once people get used to it they'll like it. And like Soc Sec and Medicare, they'll hang onto it like a dog on a bone, even though they don't understand it's 'big goverment' or 'socialized medicine'.

What we need right now while Obama has a little momentum are some quick successes on simpler issues that the public can wrap their little minds around, and that would be good campaign issues for the Dems. Voters like to hear what you've done for them, not what you plan to do. Especially if you haven't done anything. Just thinking like a dumbass here.
I can only wonder if we had more people like Howard Dean . . . on the Senate floor? But I digress...
Or maybe even as president, when we had the chance. But I digress . . .


p.s. I appreciate your detailed explanation of the process, but if that's soley for my benefit, you can skip it in the future. :wink:
 
Last edited:
D

deleted15807

It's because the Democratic party wears a mask of hypocrisy in selling its image of having the interest of the people at heart.

I may be an idiot for hoping they have more of the interest of the people at heart than the Dark Side. But really cable news has really finished America off as a thriving democracy voting with the facts and not spoon fed propaganda by 20-30 something 'jornalistists' who have spent zero time earning there way to the chair.

I don't think we need to start over.

If Trinity wants to start over you KNOW it's the wrong thing. Of course they want to start over....start over and gut the entire effort.
 

B_Nick4444

Banned
Joined
Nov 24, 2007
Posts
6,855
Likes
71
Points
133
Location
San Antonio, TX
Website
www.mymusclevideo.com
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
It's because the Democratic party wears a mask of hypocrisy in selling its image of having the interest of the people at heart.

The truth is, DEM politicians are every bit as bought and paid for as their GOP counterparts...and their own re-elections are their top priority. Every one of them knows that voters aren't the key to re-election, sponsors are. Those deep pockets who can pay for PR machines and ad campaigns.

Are there exceptions to this general truth? Sure. I happen to believe Russ Feingold is the most honorable man in federal office. But the majority of them are self-interested whores who sold out to moneyed interests long ago to get to where they are now, and who aren't about to bite the hand that's fed them so well.

The reality is that our representative democracy stopped representing the people a long time ago.


oh, man!

the light begins to shine (even on LPSG)

think I'm gonna cry ...
 

maxcok

Sexy Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Posts
7,160
Likes
97
Points
83
Location
Elsewhere
Gender
Male
I may be an idiot for hoping they have more of the interest of the people at heart than the Dark Side. But really cable news has really finished America off as a thriving democracy voting with the facts and not spoon fed propaganda by 20-30 something 'jornalistists' who have spent zero time earning there way to the chair.
You're right on that first bit (not the idiot part) I should have said that too. Right on the second bit too.
If Trinity wants to start over you KNOW it's the wrong thing. Of course they want to start over....start over and gut the entire effort.
What if we call their bluff and make em filibuster? Provided it's an old timey filibuster, where they actually have to have a majority in the chamber (not talk to an empty room and C-Span). Thoughts?
 

b.c.

Verified
Gold
Joined
Nov 7, 2005
Posts
20,541
Likes
21,728
Points
468
Location
at home
Gender
Male
What? You elected the son of a previous mayor and brother of your sitting U.S. Senator?

Dynastic politics at its worst. As Einstein observed, insanity is performing the same act over and over again but expecting a different result. Way to go, geniuses. :rolleyes:

Louisiana's is among the last of the political systems I would ever hold up as an example of how things should be.

Well perhaps you'd hold up as an example of "how things should be" the election of the half wit son of a previous president who didn't know his ass from a hole in the wall (the former or the latter). Given this and other such events of it's kind nationwide I'd say Louisiana is in fuckin' good company, pal.

Your stereotypical mischaracterizations aside, the point of my post (and the referenced article) was that we opted to put aside the usual bullshit differences in the hopes of a better way for us as a whole, by ignoring the pandering and bullshit of those who try to play on our differences...who’d use hate based rhetoric and phony issues to divide and conquer. Besides which, maybe we saw Mitch as the best candidate to get the job done.

So fuckin' yes, maybe this is a message worth considering. Too bad you didn’t get it. Or couldn’t. Who gives a fuck?

Also, maybe the point of my post was to suggest that the undoing of the Democratic Party in Washington will be too much of a willingness to try to entertain the wants of those who will NEVER support Obama, while at the same time neglecting the mandate given them by those who put them in office.

Trying to satisfy the right, whose sole purpose is to oppose all that the Obama administration hopes to accomplish is a wasted effort. They will never be satisfied.

As I said before, fuck them. BTW, while I'm at it, fuck you too.
 
Last edited:

B_VinylBoy

Banned
Joined
Nov 30, 2007
Posts
10,365
Likes
37
Points
123
Location
Boston, MA / New York, NY
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
oh, man!

the light begins to shine (even on LPSG)

think I'm gonna cry ...

Most libs will actually agree with HG on various levels. They have no problem reflecting on their own and acknowledging problems when they see it. But don't worry, most people here STILL don't agree with you. Because what YOU represent is even worse than what the Democrats are going through.

Watching you cheer HG's comment is the equivalent of watching Howard Dean and John McCain agree on something. When they both said "kill the bill and start over" last year, it was for two ENTIRELY different reasons. Someone as daft as you wouldn't be able to see it, as you embrace the headline and celebrate prematurely.

Nothing has changed, and you're still an ass and a bigot. You cry alone.
 
Last edited:

B_Nick4444

Banned
Joined
Nov 24, 2007
Posts
6,855
Likes
71
Points
133
Location
San Antonio, TX
Website
www.mymusclevideo.com
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
as I said, the light is just beginning to shine for some of you

from the posts I've seen, there's precious little intelligence or conceptualization on the left, so I would not expect a wellspring surge of epiphanies

but it looks like some of you are on the way ...
:beerchug2:
 

B_VinylBoy

Banned
Joined
Nov 30, 2007
Posts
10,365
Likes
37
Points
123
Location
Boston, MA / New York, NY
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
Swing & a miss NickySixxy...
Even if HG is criticizing democrats, much to your wanking delight, he still thinks you're an idiot. As do I. And many others. The light he sees is NOT the one you see. The sooner you realize this, the quicker you'll STFU and go back into the closet you crawled out of.

Pun very much intended. :rolleyes:
 
Joined
Aug 25, 2008
Posts
4,609
Likes
1,199
Points
258
Location
USA
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
as I said, the light is just beginning to shine for some of you

from the posts I've seen, there's precious little intelligence or conceptualization on the left, so I would not expect a wellspring surge of epiphanies

but it looks like some of you are on the way ...
:beerchug2:

All your posts are laughable in their ironically vacuous pretension.

But your efforts in this thread are especially ridiculous.
 

B_VinylBoy

Banned
Joined
Nov 30, 2007
Posts
10,365
Likes
37
Points
123
Location
Boston, MA / New York, NY
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
Both parties are full of shit. Its just that the Democrats, on this issue anyway, are a little less full of shit.

We have a winner!!!
Pay attention NickySixxy... even with your constant use of a thesaurus to turn your everyday words into literary sophistication, the fact that this elementary-level introspection fails to adhere to your encephalon demonstrates why you work so diligently to look like a Rhodes scholar...

When everyone knows you don't have a fuckin' clue. :rolleyes:
 

maxcok

Sexy Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Posts
7,160
Likes
97
Points
83
Location
Elsewhere
Gender
Male
. . . from the posts I've seen, there's precious little intelligence or conceptualization on the left, so I would not expect a wellspring surge of epiphanies . . .

Really. Did you pull out your thesaurus for that 'wellspring surge' ?





Dammit VB, you stole my joke again while I was typing. You're too fast. It's not fair.
 
Last edited:

HazelGod

Sexy Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2006
Posts
7,158
Likes
26
Points
183
Location
The Other Side of the Pillow
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
Well perhaps you'd hold up as an example of "how things should be" the election of the half wit son of a previous president who didn't know his ass from a hole in the wall (the former or the latter). Given this and other such events of it's kind nationwide I'd say Louisiana is in fuckin' good company, pal.
Yeah, it is...that was the entire point of my paraphrasing Einstein, genius. You've seen the results of this behavior for decades, in both your own state and on the national stage...and in full knowledge of those results, you did the very same goddamned thing again. In case you somehow missed my many polemics against Hillary becoming the Dem nominee for POTUS, it was for the very same reason.

The only message you've sent is that you're complete fucking morons incapable of learning from past mistakes. Good job.
 

D_Harry_Crax

Account Disabled
Joined
Sep 3, 2006
Posts
4,454
Likes
609
Points
228
Sexuality
No Response
'Herding cats' never rang so true as it does now with the Democrats.[/COLOR]

Well, the most common usage of trying to herd cats in the USA is in reference to trying to manage college professors and, for better or worse, the only college professor I know of in the government is the president (who I still support even though I'm mostly disappointed by him).
 

Pendlum

Verified
Gold
Joined
Feb 24, 2008
Posts
2,096
Likes
25
Points
293
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Do you really think the parties define the Light and Dark Side of the American political system?

I AM YOUR FATHER *KHOOOSHHH*

(That was the best onomatopoeia I could come up with for the respirator sound)