Standing Tall ;D

D_Mike Oxsohr

Account Disabled
Joined
Sep 4, 2007
Posts
58
Media
0
Likes
3
Points
151
Hey again! Just keeping you guys entertained with some more photos :rolleyes:
the crazt thing is that you can actually see precum falling from my dick I dont know about you....but thats crazy hot to me :tongue:
 

Attachments

shadow28

Expert Member
Gold
Platinum Gold
Joined
Jul 7, 2004
Posts
320
Media
0
Likes
112
Points
533
I'm all about the precum, to me nothing is hotter.
But that combination of huge cock and thin body is pretty amazing too. Wow. Please keep posting!
 

thebuck

Admired Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2006
Posts
650
Media
13
Likes
886
Points
323
Location
South Florida
Sexuality
69% Gay, 31% Straight
Gender
Male
I thought I was thin but you got me beat. That is a monster cock and you look good enough to eat so be proud of your sexyness. Yum !
 

Calboner

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Aug 16, 2007
Posts
9,028
Media
29
Likes
7,895
Points
433
Location
USA
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Wow, you are one gifted dude. I will recommend you for a position on the board of trustees of the Skinny Guys with Huge Cocks Association. :tongue:
 

maxcok

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Posts
7,153
Media
0
Likes
126
Points
83
Location
Elsewhere
Gender
Male
You guys really can't see it's photoshopped? Really?
I can, and I've said so before.

Plus has anyone stopped to wonder how he he makes it disappear inside his panties?

huge photoshopped schlong:
http://www.lpsg.org/members/gavinator/albums/moi/502836-photo03150010.jpg
http://www.lpsg.org/members/gavinator/albums/moi/500255-photo03071328-2.jpg

vanishing act:
http://www.lpsg.org/members/gavinator/albums/moi/500250-gavgav.jpg
http://www.lpsg.org/members/gavinator/albums/moi/500252-img-0611.jpg


p.s. Don't bother leaving skeptical comments on his profile. He makes them disappear too.
 
Last edited:

Calboner

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Aug 16, 2007
Posts
9,028
Media
29
Likes
7,895
Points
433
Location
USA
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
I can, and I've said so before.

Plus has anyone stopped to wonder how he he makes it disappear inside his panties?

huge photoshopped schlong:
http://www.lpsg.org/members/gavinator/albums/moi/502836-photo03150010.jpg
http://www.lpsg.org/members/gavinator/albums/moi/500255-photo03071328-2.jpg

vanishing act:
http://www.lpsg.org/members/gavinator/albums/moi/500250-gavgav.jpg
http://www.lpsg.org/members/gavinator/albums/moi/500252-img-0611.jpg


p.s. Don't bother leaving skeptical comments on his profile. He deletes them immediately.

:redface: Well, color me fooled. Now that I have I looked at the guy's gallery, I have to say that I can't see any clear signs of alteration in the individual photos, except for this one, where the underpants have a weird border to them. I am not sure how much weight to give to the complete absence of bulge in the shots where he's got his underpants on: there are freakish "growers," after all. It seems to me, though, that there is plain evidence of fakery is the disparity in erect size between, e.g., this photo and most of the others, such as this one.

Gavinator, your membership in the Skinny Guys with Huge Cocks Association is hereby revoked. :thumbsdown2:

I have to say, though, that the alteration in the photos posted in this thread is some of the best that I have ever seen.
 

HappyBoi

Admired Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2009
Posts
1,480
Media
8
Likes
916
Points
148
Location
Earth
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
I can, and I've said so before.

Plus has anyone stopped to wonder how he he makes it disappear inside his panties?

huge photoshopped schlong:
http://www.lpsg.org/members/gavinator/albums/moi/502836-photo03150010.jpg
http://www.lpsg.org/members/gavinator/albums/moi/500255-photo03071328-2.jpg

Could you please then, for us who can't see any signs of photoshopping, please point them out instead of just linking the pictures? :) I don't have those photoshop-eyes, I can never see stuff like that.

:redface: Well, color me fooled. Now that I have I looked at the guy's gallery, I have to say that I can't see any clear signs of alteration in the individual photos, except for this one, where the underpants have a weird border to them. I am not sure how much weight to give to the complete absence of bulge in the shots where he's got his underpants on: there are freakish "growers," after all. It seems to me, though, that there is plain evidence of fakery is the disparity in erect size between, e.g., this photo and most of the others, such as this one.

Gavinator, your membership in the Skinny Guys with Huge Cocks Association is hereby revoked. :thumbsdown2:

I have to say, though, that the alteration in the photos posted in this thread is some of the best that I have ever seen.

What kind of fakery?
 
6

648306

Guest
I agree with HappyBoi... give the guy time to prove himself!!
 

maxcok

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Posts
7,153
Media
0
Likes
126
Points
83
Location
Elsewhere
Gender
Male
I have to say, though, that the alteration in the photos posted in this thread is some of the best that I have ever seen.
Certainly much better than average, which is why I think lots of people have been fooled, but there are lots of tell tale clues. The undie border you pointed out is the first one I noticed too. Look at the intersections where his genitals join his body. It's rather well blended, but looks anatomically awkward in several pics, plus there are abrupt changes in skin tone in several of them too. Look at the hands too; they don't match up in some of the pics. In some where he's holding his dick the fingers look impossibly long wrapped around his dick, and in the ones where he's wearing the bracelet you can see that the image has been spliced in.

Edit:
I am not sure how much weight to give to the complete absence of bulge in the shots where he's got his underpants on: there are freakish "growers," after all.
Even if he tripled in length and quadrupled in girth, which would be highly unusual if not impossible, he'd still be showing way more flaccid bulge. Heck, if he cut off his dick, his balls alone would show a much bigger bulge.

http://www.lpsg.org/members/gavinator/albums/moi/500249-photo03071326-2.jpg
http://www.lpsg.org/members/gavinator/albums/moi/500252-img-0611.jpg
 
Last edited:

Calboner

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Aug 16, 2007
Posts
9,028
Media
29
Likes
7,895
Points
433
Location
USA
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
What kind of fakery?

You quote my post and then make a comment that indicates that you didn't even read it, or at least that you read it without weighing the arguments.

Even if he tripled in length and quadrupled in girth, which would be highly unusual if not impossible, he'd still be showing way more flaccid bulge. Heck, if he cut off his dick, his balls alone would show a much bigger bulge.

http://www.lpsg.org/members/gavinator/albums/moi/500249-photo03071326-2.jpg
http://www.lpsg.org/members/gavinator/albums/moi/500252-img-0611.jpg

If my argument, and the pair of photos that I cited, were not enough to decide the matter, this argument and this pair of photos would be.

Anybody who has read Maxcok's and my posts, has examined the photos in light of our arguments, and still believes that the photos are unaltered, shows a serious impairment of judgment.
 

HappyBoi

Admired Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2009
Posts
1,480
Media
8
Likes
916
Points
148
Location
Earth
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
:redface:Well, color me fooled. Now that I have I looked at the guy's gallery, I have to say that I can't see any clear signs of alteration in the individual photos, except for this one, where the underpants have a weird border to them.[/B] I am not sure how much weight to give to the complete absence of bulge in the shots where he's got his underpants on: there are freakish "growers," after all.It seems to me, though, that there is plain evidence of fakery is the disparity in erect size[/B] between, e.g., this photo and most of the others, such as this one.

Gavinator, your membership in the Skinny Guys with Huge Cocks Association is hereby revoked. :thumbsdown2:

I have to say, though, that the alteration in the photos posted in this thread is some of the best that I have ever seen.

You quote my post and then make a comment that indicates that you didn't even read it, or at least that you read it without weighing the arguments.



If my argument, and the pair of photos that I cited, were not enough to decide the matter, this argument and this pair of photos would be.

Anybody who has read Maxcok's and my posts, has examined the photos in light of our arguments, and still believes that the photos are unaltered, shows a serious impairment of judgment.


Not really sure it shows a serious impairment of judgement. It just shows you should read through your own post before you enter it. First, you begin with saying you can't see any signs of alteration, after which you say that fakery is easily spotted, and you end with saying these are some of the best alterations you've seen - would that be the alterations you couldn't see? :smile: So I was just curious as to what fakery you were talking about..

And even claiming that those who don't see your 'proof' of alteration have a serious impairment of judgement, when all you've done is typing out your skeptical viewpoint of the pictures with no real evidence to back it up, is silly. What you're doing is at the same level as people claiming sizes without evidence backing them up. :smile: