rawbone8
Cherished Member
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2004
- Posts
- 2,827
- Media
- 1
- Likes
- 295
- Points
- 303
- Location
- Ontario (Canada)
- Sexuality
- 99% Straight, 1% Gay
- Gender
- Male
I agree that the director calls the shot.
Perhaps it makes it a little easier for the consumer to visualize that it's his (the viewer's own) dick spraying up there on the star's face, tits or ass, while he performs his own soloist money shot from his sofa.
I'd think too that the porn performer is responsible for getting it out in impressive juicy spurts and landing it on his target for the benefit of the lens. It makes sense that he'd be better technically able to ensure that it goes where it's supposed to go, and on cue. If the stroking is out of sync it might just dribble disappointingly when the scene calls for more trajectory.
If the director wanted a male performer to cum on demand much sooner I'm sure he'd do that too.
Perhaps it makes it a little easier for the consumer to visualize that it's his (the viewer's own) dick spraying up there on the star's face, tits or ass, while he performs his own soloist money shot from his sofa.
I'd think too that the porn performer is responsible for getting it out in impressive juicy spurts and landing it on his target for the benefit of the lens. It makes sense that he'd be better technically able to ensure that it goes where it's supposed to go, and on cue. If the stroking is out of sync it might just dribble disappointingly when the scene calls for more trajectory.
If the director wanted a male performer to cum on demand much sooner I'm sure he'd do that too.