Stereotypes
- Thread starter MetalAngie2010
- Start date
The peins size information you have comes from Wikipedia?????????? That is not accurate information. Wikipdeia evens acknowledges this. "These results cannot be taken as fact due to this being a questionnaire, the small sampling size, and the truthfulness of the respondents. [37] "
One part of that inaccurate article agrees with me
One part of that inaccurate article agrees with me
- Family Health International states "The World Health Organization bases its specifications for condom width on consumer preference and penis size, citing three studies. The studies uses varying methods of measurements between sources, such as maximum circumference (US measurements) instead of base circumferece (Thai measurements). The Kinsey reports were based on self-reported results from African and Caucasian Americans. Taken together, the studies show significant variations in penis size within the three population groups, but also indicate that African American men on average have a slightly wider and longer penis size, Australian and Caucasian American men have a medium size, and Thai men a slightly narrower and shorter size."
Hmmm. White whale, Moby Dick; got it. Speaking as a white whale, I can say I've never heard that one before. On LPSG one learns something every day.
I understand, and that's cool. I said I liked confident guys, not arrogant guys. And it doesn't bother me that much if you boast, just when you make it a race thing. So it's fine to be proud about your size.
I've given tons on handies and head, just never had it in my cooch. Amazing cock by the way, but it makes my virginal cooch shrink in terror. Lol.
I'd need some practice before you first.
Okay, I just want to reply to some other posts.
I am not in any way ashamed of my race. I get just as peeved when a white guy brags about his size as when a black guys do; but not all that much either way. But come on, has anyone else here ever listened ro rap? That's all they fucking talk about. I mainly get pissed off when people make it a race thing, just to put other people down. Because of this I have several sisters who wouldn't even consider a great white guy, just because the buy into the stereotype.
I know that not all black guys are like this, and I have total love and respect for those that aren't, but we all must admit there is a tendency in the black community to brag about size in the terms of race. It's why I always evaluate people on an individual basis.
If you have a big dick, whatever color it is, be proud of it. Even brag about it from time to time; if it's not that often it can be cute. But please, it makes me sick when people try to put other groups down. I'm just reporting my experience, and trying to set the record straight, so some of the big white guys can have some well deserved confidence.
White guys and black guys can be just as good in my opinion, and if I found a black guy that I loved, I wouldn't hesitate to pursue a relationship with him. I'm just attracted to white guys, that's all. I mean, some guys like girls with black hair, some like them with light hair. Some girls like guys with black skin, I just like them with light skin.
I am not in any way ashamed of my race. I get just as peeved when a white guy brags about his size as when a black guys do; but not all that much either way. But come on, has anyone else here ever listened ro rap? That's all they fucking talk about. I mainly get pissed off when people make it a race thing, just to put other people down. Because of this I have several sisters who wouldn't even consider a great white guy, just because the buy into the stereotype.
I know that not all black guys are like this, and I have total love and respect for those that aren't, but we all must admit there is a tendency in the black community to brag about size in the terms of race. It's why I always evaluate people on an individual basis.
If you have a big dick, whatever color it is, be proud of it. Even brag about it from time to time; if it's not that often it can be cute. But please, it makes me sick when people try to put other groups down. I'm just reporting my experience, and trying to set the record straight, so some of the big white guys can have some well deserved confidence.
White guys and black guys can be just as good in my opinion, and if I found a black guy that I loved, I wouldn't hesitate to pursue a relationship with him. I'm just attracted to white guys, that's all. I mean, some guys like girls with black hair, some like them with light hair. Some girls like guys with black skin, I just like them with light skin.
You conveniently left out that part:
The WHO document referred to only specifies data for the US, Australia and Thailand, and not races in general.
...so, no, it doesn't agree with you. There are several studies listed
in that Wikipedia article, and all of their references are cited, also. The text in the Wiki article is based on what is found inside those actual studies, so it's actually inacurate to say that it's, well, not accurate information (by the way: Wikipedia has been found to be as accurate as Encyclopedia Britannica, so your point is quite moot).
But hey, if you want to stroke your ego by believing that blacks are larger than everyone else, knock yourself out, I won't stop you. All I know is that a broad application of a stereotype and a generalization applied to an entire race is pretty goddamn stupid to me.
invisibleman
Loved Member
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2005
- Posts
- 9,816
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 513
- Points
- 303
- Location
- North Carolina
- Sexuality
- 99% Gay, 1% Straight
- Gender
- Male
No, I think Americans are obsessed with many things other than race. I am of the opinion that it is never good "keep one's mouth shut". You should speak your mind. How else are you going to know where people are coming from? That is feedback. That is honest communication. People don't have to agree on everything. :smile:
One thing's for sure, though - if we all keep fucking each other, regardless of race, we'll all end up a delicious shade of cocoa, or olive, or darker tan, and there won't be any 'races' to speak of anymore (which will probably be a damn good thing, considering all the wars that have been caused by racial or cultural differences).
Brown, black, white, yellow or purple, I love ALL women. :biggrin1:
invisibleman
Loved Member
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2005
- Posts
- 9,816
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 513
- Points
- 303
- Location
- North Carolina
- Sexuality
- 99% Gay, 1% Straight
- Gender
- Male
Well Wikipedia CAN be as accurate, but it is definitely not. Mainly because ANYBODY can edit ANY Wikipedia entry.
But the fact of the matter is race has no scientific stipulation on size...and there has NEVER been a large enough survey group to study average penis size on anyone but Caucasian men. My assumption is that the male average is the male average. End of story.
(Of course, that says absolutely nothing...lol)
What a load. Even the cited "study" didn't find that - by its own measure, Wikipedia had 32% more errors than Britannica.
But even that is bogus. It can't be taken as a general assertion that Wikipedia is even in the same ballpark as Britannica, as it depends on which articles were used for the test. I know of a number of Wikipedia entries which seem to be 100% correct. They are entries in linguistics and theoretical optics. I use Wikipedia quite a bit for those subjects. Some of the Wikipedia linguistics articles are suspect, though, especially regarding eastern Eurpopean languages, as there seem to be some feuds being fought out on Wikipedia between, for example, some persons of Slovak ancestry and others of Romanian. And some of the Wikipedia optics articles were actually cribbed in toto from Britannica. (Specifically, the 11th Britannica, uncredited; or sometimes, incorrectly attributed to the 10th Britannica.)
And the Nature "study" is far too vague. Who were the "experts"? Noam Chomsky? On a very few topics, he's a high-profile expert; on most topics, he's a high-profile crank. Britannica's experts are listed in Britannica. This was what made, for instance, the 14th Britannica such a big deal - the article on Space-Time was followed by the initials "A.E.", meaning that it was written by Albert Einstein; the entry on Guerrilla Warfare was written by "T.E.L." - T.E. Lawrence. Since the Nature study relies on experts, it's not irrelevant to ask just who Nature's experts were.
Wikipedia is clearly useless if the subject is anything controversial or very recent. It's great for topics which something like Britannica will probably never cover, like the name of the horse which played Mister Ed. It's not very good at all on current topics, like "is George Bush a doodoohead?" or "is Anne Rice fucked up, or what?"
Full disclosure - I have the 1st, 9th, 11th, 12th, late 14th, and early 15th Britannicas, and I don't keep them around because I think they're crap.
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2006
- Posts
- 1,135
- Media
- 235
- Likes
- 16,715
- Points
- 618
- Location
- Dallas (Texas, United States)
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- 100% Straight, 0% Gay
- Gender
- Male
Similar threads
