1. Welcome To LPSG
    Welcome to LPSG.com. If you are here because you are looking for the most amazing open-minded fun-spirited sexy adult community then you have found the right place. We also happen to have some of the sexiest members you'll ever meet. Signup below and come join us.


Stevens retirement: what next?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by hottcjimmyv, Apr 9, 2010.

  1. hottcjimmyv

    hottcjimmyv Experimental Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2007
    Posts:
    144
    Albums:
    2
    Likes Received:
    19
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    home: Dixie, school: north east
    Stevens is retiring. If all sign point to a shift to the right in the 2010 mid-term and possibly a Republican in the Oval Office in 2012, if Terry Gross's guest on March 25, Mark Potok from the Southern Poverty Law center, is accurate and the right has ultimately ceded its moderate ground and is shifting hard right, what is President Obama to do? Should he give up re-election in favor of putting a young progressive on the bench while he has the votes, or should he go for maintaining majorities in congress and maintaining the White House?

    Challenge: comment on the ideas and the politics in this question, but avoid personal (ad hominen) attacks on the people on the opposite side of the fence. I believe we can still do this! Prove me right!
     
  2. B_talltpaguy

    B_talltpaguy Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2007
    Posts:
    2,332
    Likes Received:
    12
    Gender:
    Male
    Thread has been up all day. You're late... http://www.lpsg.org/178807-justice-stevens-retires.html


    btw, real cute way you frame a false debate, and then demand that people be suckered by it. Obama will not only win re-election, but he's going to appoint the most liberal jurist he can find, and then appoint them during recess is need be. The Republicans are a joke, and won't be any more effective at stopping Obama now, then they were during the minimum wage, stimulus and HCR debates.
     
    #2 B_talltpaguy, Apr 9, 2010
    Last edited: Apr 9, 2010
  3. joeweekend

    Gold Member Verified

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2009
    Posts:
    1,649
    Albums:
    2
    Likes Received:
    551
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Phoenix (AZ, US)
    Verified:
    Photo
    "Progressive" sentiments have no place on the high court. "Progressive" means makin' up schemes you think are really great, then ramming them down others' throats.

    Judges aren't allowed to do that.
     
  4. B_talltpaguy

    B_talltpaguy Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2007
    Posts:
    2,332
    Likes Received:
    12
    Gender:
    Male
    Your rather ridiculous opinion is not based on reality, and has no place in an honest discussion.
     
  5. hottcjimmyv

    hottcjimmyv Experimental Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2007
    Posts:
    144
    Albums:
    2
    Likes Received:
    19
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    home: Dixie, school: north east
    Tall, I think the question I'm asking is diffferent that the thread to which you linked. I wasn't interested in being the first to post. I was interested in trying to spark a debate that was a bit above the fray of personal attacks. Sorry if I failed to do so in ur judgment. I hope all is well in your world.
    Jimmy
     
  6. HazelGod

    HazelGod Experimental Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2006
    Posts:
    7,158
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    24
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    The Other Side of the Pillow
    False dichotomy.
     
  7. swordfishME

    swordfishME Sexy Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2006
    Posts:
    942
    Likes Received:
    32
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    DFW Texas
    Lets be realistic...a recess appointment to the Supreme Court would be political suicide for Obama
     
  8. hottcjimmyv

    hottcjimmyv Experimental Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2007
    Posts:
    144
    Albums:
    2
    Likes Received:
    19
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    home: Dixie, school: north east
    K, hazel, I'm willing to admit that my question may rest on a false dichotomy--perhaps the cultural landscape is different-- but don't just criticize: reframe the question. What do u see on the horizon for the president and what do you think he willl do?

    I would also posit that if my read is not a false dichotomy, then it is in the interest of Obama's oponents to play off certain fringe opinions as centrist and play up themselves as minority.

    With repsect,
    Jimmy
     
  9. sargon20

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2006
    Posts:
    22,157
    Likes Received:
    30,966
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Atlantis
    We had an entire war rammed down our throats. That ramming cost us 3 trillion dollars and 90,000+ lives. While the health care bill is expected to cost 900 billion over ten years and save 45000 lives a year who die due to lack of health care. I can understand why they would make a conservative mad. Money should be spent on killing not saving lives.
     
  10. b.c.

    Gold Member Verified

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2005
    Posts:
    20,410
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    21,496
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    at home
    Verified:
    Photo
    What next? A lot of gop foaming at mouth, no doubt.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice