Straight Male Porn Stars Solo

Question: Do porn companies purposely encourage or require straight porn stars to not be muscular, have imperfections or have 'dad bods?" I know the focus on straight porn is the women and the audience are typically the average man so do they want to at least make them closer to average so they could be relatable? Most of the straight porn stars I see here have big cocks but a lot of them have this untidy/unkept look?

This is usually the American ones.
Also American men don't usually go overboard with grooming as I've noticed with European male porn stars who seem to get rid of all their body hair.

Broadly speaking, American men almost never groom their armpits, legs, etc. unless they're bodybuilders or swimmers.
 
Guys this penis implant of Eddie Dean made me really unhappy. Just look at this photos, he made his cock as thick as his wrist. Its not normal. When it will come to fucking, girls will have incredible pain while taking his fat cock. His dick looks too huge and unnatural, fake for me. I mean it is a nice cock but its like the cock doesnt fit the body.
When did he post this video? When did he have the enlargement surgery?

I looks amazing imo
 
A lot of male porn stars also keep working for years so they start getting dadbod-y. Look at Preston Parker who used to be really fit and now looks kind of sloppy.

For some reason there isn't much turnover for straight male pornstars in US porn.

mainstream straight porn companies used to hire male talent based on sexual performance—ability to get hard, stay hard, and cum on command—and attitude—performers are expected to be punctual, agreeable, and take direction no matter what. it's the reason ron jeremy and so much other male talent have had such long careers—and their bodies show it, but many of them still maintain an above average physique—though, i have noticed a shift in talent being hired in the past few years.

i commented in another thread that it was strange that so much current male talent being hired by studios don't have aspirational forms; they don't have 10 inch dicks or are giant muscled studs, so many of them are twinks that look like they got lost on their way to freshman orientation.

i wonder how much the shift has to do with the current economics of porn; significantly less compensation from studios attracts young, inexperienced performers that don't fully understand the market and risks of the profession, but also the ouroborous effect of talent performing in studio porn while also creating and distributing their own content on platforms like onlyfans. i think this will create higher turnover rates similar to female talent in porn, but for significantly different reasons.
 
Guys this penis implant of Eddie Dean made me really unhappy. Just look at this photos, he made his cock as thick as his wrist. Its not normal. When it will come to fucking, girls will have incredible pain while taking his fat cock. His dick looks too huge and unnatural, fake for me. I mean it is a nice cock but its like the cock doesnt fit the body.
When did he post this video? When did he have the enlargement surgery?
did he actually get an implant or are you being hyperbolic?
 
mainstream straight porn companies used to hire male talent based on sexual performance—ability to get hard, stay hard, and cum on command—and attitude—performers are expected to be punctual, agreeable, and take direction no matter what. it's the reason ron jeremy and so much other male talent have had such long careers—and their bodies show it, but many of them still maintain an above average physique—though, i have noticed a shift in talent being hired in the past few years.

i commented in another thread that it was strange that so much current male talent being hired by studios don't have aspirational forms; they don't have 10 inch dicks or are giant muscled studs, so many of them are twinks that look like they got lost on their way to freshman orientation.

i wonder how much the shift has to do with the current economics of porn; significantly less compensation from studios attracts young, inexperienced performers that don't fully understand the market and risks of the profession, but also the ouroborous effect of talent performing in studio porn while also creating and distributing their own content on platforms like onlyfans. i think this will create higher turnover rates similar to female talent in porn, but for significantly different reasons.
Part of it might be changing viewership demographics?

They may be looking to attract more female or younger viewers. Studios like Team Skeet seem to be doing more experimental porn and genre/niche categories like incest fantasies more.

I have to say though that most studio porn still has the awful camera angles of cropping out the guys or the same old focus on closeups. I commented in another thread that Janet Mason's personal site had some great video angles where they show both performers versus the same static angles that studio porn uses. A lot of the studio porn you might as well be watching a woman fuck a dildo lol.
 
Part of it might be changing viewership demographics?

They may be looking to attract more female or younger viewers. Studios like Team Skeet seem to be doing more experimental porn and genre/niche categories like incest fantasies more.

I have to say though that most studio porn still has the awful camera angles of cropping out the guys or the same old focus on closeups. I commented in another thread that Janet Mason's personal site had some great video angles where they show both performers versus the same static angles that studio porn uses. A lot of the studio porn you might as well be watching a woman fuck a dildo lol.

i think that's part of it.

mainstream porn's always been reflective of viewer tastes, which is also why it's so problematic.

mainstream porn is weird: straight porn features straight, but mostly bisexual men having sex with women for an intended straight male audience, "gay" male porn is mostly gay for pay men having sex with each other for a gay male/men who have sex with men (msm) and straight female audience, and "lesbian" porn features gay for pay women having sex with each other for a straight male audience and almost all of it's produced and marketed by straight men.

mainstream straight porn is all about objectifying the women to appeal to the fantasies of the men watching and that audience is very vocal about the angles used during filming. there's a strong demand to eliminate the male talent from view as much as possible. i get that to a certain extent. almost all the porn i watch is for a specific performer or sex act so i want them/that featured as heavily as possible and everything else to be minimized.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fire_Within