Baloney.
Experiencing something firsthand brings an understanding that surpasses anyone who is just studying it from the outside.
If you want to know what chocolate tastes like, then eat it - don't just study other people who eat chocolate.
You wouldn’t get a lot of argument from me on that.
However, Ms. Mead would be quick to remind us that our cultural history and experience(s) would significantly limit our ability to communicate what we experienced when we ate chocolate and why we experienced it as we did.
For example, based on our cultural history,
--We might find the taste of chocolate to be frightening since it resembles something else we have tasted that was associated with a bad experience.
--We might find the taste of chocolate makes us feel happy and comforted but not understand the chemical pros and cons of eating chocolate and its impact on the body/mind.
--We might find the taste of chocolate makes us ashamed since our culture has moralizes against it.
--We might find the taste of chocolate makes us feel rich since we have been taught to associate that taste with privilege.
I don’t have a copy of the article, but somewhere back around 1950 one of Ms Mead’s colleagues presented a paper called something like “Cultural Habits of the Nacirema”.
Nacirema is American spelled backward, but the objective of the article was to have a space alien describe how he saw an American getting ready for work in the morning. It was a humorous article.
The intent was to cause the reader to say to themselves, “I never thought what I did could be seen/understood that way”.
Margaret Mead:
I have spent most of my life studying the lives of other peoples — faraway peoples — so that Americans might better understand themselves.