Super-Duper Tuesday is over. What happens Now?

swordfishME

Expert Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2006
Posts
960
Media
0
Likes
136
Points
263
Location
DFW Texas
Sexuality
80% Gay, 20% Straight
Gender
Male
Super Tuesday is over.

Republicans: Huckabee played spoiler for Romney and it seems McCain has the nomination all sewn up. Which is in a way good for the Republicans, because they needed to get a somewhat-middle-of-the-road candidate to stand a chance in November.

Democrats: This is is fast becoming a mess. Unless something drastic happens soon, I don't think that either Clinton or Obama will have enough delegates to clinch the nomination even after all the primaries are over. It will then dissolve into a He Said-She Said mess that will have to be somehow sorted out at the convention.

What does everyone think?
 

Northland

Sexy Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2007
Posts
5,924
Media
0
Likes
39
Points
123
Sexuality
No Response
The Democratic Party long ago (2000) decided that Hillary would be their leader this year. They knew that she had to strengthen her legitimate political legs and that meant a term as a Senator. Yes, she had been politically involved and connected for years-she, herself has spoken of her '35 years' of service, which of course was mostly steering along her husband WJC; but, she needed a political record of here own in order to legitimize her run.

The Democratic Party even knew they'd need some sort of contender to be scooting along (just barely) in back of her. Don't for a second fool yourself into some misguided belief that the Dems plan to allow Obama a full win. Neither Clinton nor Obama will have the necessary number of delegates to secure the nomination on their own. The future is as such: A lengthy convention will go back and forth and arguing the world (no, not the wonderful documentary with Daniel Bell, Irving Howe, Irving Kristol and Nathan Glazer) among other things. In the end, Obama will in gentlemanly fashion concede (pretend) that Clinton is indeed the best thing to ever come down the pike and tell us how we should all support her.


Later, in November, Clinton will suffer the full wrath of all Republicans. No, they don't turn out in primaries as heartily as Democrats, they do however arrive for general elections. No Republican wants a Clinton. They are not thrilled by McCain; he has however, managed to be somewhat conservative and he is a longtime Republican-that being the key to their voting for him. I submit that, McCain could say 'abortions for all and homosexual marriages everywhere' and he would win as long as he is listed as a Republican. Democrats I have found, are more likely and willing to cross party lines in elections than are Democrats.

In addition to the Republicans who will not vote for Clinton, there will be the Democrats who loathe Clinton for her at times right-wing leanings. They will then see McCain, who until about now, has been much more center and at times even left-leaning, this will give them pause and then cause to select him as their next President.

The Democrats have created a bigger mess than they had ever thought possible. Clinton goes about with a general sense of entitlement (look at Michigan and Florida) and the Democratic Party, rather than put her in her place allows it. (After all, to smack her would be to smack their god, Bill Clinton-which would mean death to Howard Dean) I believe the Dems never saw the level of ego which Hillary Clinton would display. Neither did they realize that there would be a serious contender (Obama) who would have such wide range appeal. Unfortunately they are now in their self-made quagmire and there is no easy way out, if any way out.

Where does it leave us in the end? 60% chance (I never guarentee anything) of next January watching term #3 of Republican leadership in the form of Johnny McCain and his Veep Mike Huckabee (Huckabee is the key to securing Republican votes, since: A)He can grab the conservatives and fundamentalists and B)McCain is getting up in years, the relative youth of Huckabee will balance that on the campaign trail). It'll be a squeaker; but, McCain/Huckabee will win over Clinton and her baggage.
 

HazelGod

Sexy Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2006
Posts
7,154
Media
1
Likes
31
Points
183
Location
The Other Side of the Pillow
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
Later, in November, Clinton will suffer the full wrath of all Republicans.

I'm not sure I agree with your contention that the Dems have been planning to put that cunt up front all along...but your analysis of the results of such an eventuality is dead-on, in my opinion. Selecting her as their nominee would be the best thing the party could do to shoot itself in the foot this time around.
 

B_InDepth

Sexy Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2007
Posts
328
Media
0
Likes
43
Points
103
Location
around
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
i am fully convinced that there is no hope.. the election is a scam.. there is nothing you are i can do about any of it.. a kid, 16 years old at my meet-up group last night hacked into diabold in 10 minutes... just to show it can be done.. and he said anyone with a basic knowledge of accounting programing could change the results...

i think the mexicans are dumb to jump the fence into America..! im gunna jump the fence into mexico and be a cabanna boy.
 

Pecker

Retired Moderator
Joined
Mar 5, 2002
Posts
54,502
Media
0
Likes
323
Points
283
Just two of our presidents have come directly from the Senate: Warren G. Harding in 1920 and John F. Kennedy in 1960. Another 13 former senators have made it to the White House since 1789 but indirectly, usually through the vice presidency. And in the past 50 years, senators have suffered some of the worst defeats on record.

According to the Senatorial Curse, our next President may well be a Huckabee, a Romney or a Bloomberg.
 

faceking

Cherished Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2004
Posts
7,426
Media
6
Likes
283
Points
208
Location
Mavs, NOR * CAL
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
a kid, 16 years old at my meet-up group last night hacked into diabold in 10 minutes... just to show it can be done.. and he said anyone with a basic knowledge of accounting programing could change the results...

riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.
 

davec94

Experimental Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2007
Posts
341
Media
0
Likes
11
Points
163
Location
London, UK
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
I'm not sure I agree with your contention that the Dems have been planning to put that cunt up front all along...but your analysis of the results of such an eventuality is dead-on, in my opinion. Selecting her as their nominee would be the best thing the party could do to shoot itself in the foot this time around.

i don't think there was any big conspiracy theories around it, but if you look at how many super-delegates pledged to Hillary early on you can see that there is a large (much larger than Obama) party establishment base hoping that she wins. Obama's only hope is to pick up enough pledged delegates and undecided supers before the DNC.
 

Industrialsize

Mythical Member
Gold
Platinum Gold
Joined
Dec 23, 2006
Posts
22,256
Media
213
Likes
32,279
Points
618
Location
Kathmandu (Bagmati Province, Nepal)
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
The Democratic Party long ago (2000) decided that Hillary would be their leader this year. They knew that she had to strengthen her legitimate political legs and that meant a term as a Senator. Yes, she had been politically involved and connected for years-she, herself has spoken of her '35 years' of service, which of course was mostly steering along her husband WJC; but, she needed a political record of here own in order to legitimize her run.

The Democratic Party even knew they'd need some sort of contender to be scooting along (just barely) in back of her. Don't for a second fool yourself into some misguided belief that the Dems plan to allow Obama a full win. Neither Clinton nor Obama will have the necessary number of delegates to secure the nomination on their own. The future is as such: A lengthy convention will go back and forth and arguing the world (no, not the wonderful documentary with Daniel Bell, Irving Howe, Irving Kristol and Nathan Glazer) among other things. In the end, Obama will in gentlemanly fashion concede (pretend) that Clinton is indeed the best thing to ever come down the pike and tell us how we should all support her.


Later, in November, Clinton will suffer the full wrath of all Republicans. No, they don't turn out in primaries as heartily as Democrats, they do however arrive for general elections. No Republican wants a Clinton. They are not thrilled by McCain; he has however, managed to be somewhat conservative and he is a longtime Republican-that being the key to their voting for him. I submit that, McCain could say 'abortions for all and homosexual marriages everywhere' and he would win as long as he is listed as a Republican. Democrats I have found, are more likely and willing to cross party lines in elections than are Democrats.

In addition to the Republicans who will not vote for Clinton, there will be the Democrats who loathe Clinton for her at times right-wing leanings. They will then see McCain, who until about now, has been much more center and at times even left-leaning, this will give them pause and then cause to select him as their next President.

The Democrats have created a bigger mess than they had ever thought possible. Clinton goes about with a general sense of entitlement (look at Michigan and Florida) and the Democratic Party, rather than put her in her place allows it. (After all, to smack her would be to smack their god, Bill Clinton-which would mean death to Howard Dean) I believe the Dems never saw the level of ego which Hillary Clinton would display. Neither did they realize that there would be a serious contender (Obama) who would have such wide range appeal. Unfortunately they are now in their self-made quagmire and there is no easy way out, if any way out.

Where does it leave us in the end? 60% chance (I never guarentee anything) of next January watching term #3 of Republican leadership in the form of Johnny McCain and his Veep Mike Huckabee (Huckabee is the key to securing Republican votes, since: A)He can grab the conservatives and fundamentalists and B)McCain is getting up in years, the relative youth of Huckabee will balance that on the campaign trail). It'll be a squeaker; but, McCain/Huckabee will win over Clinton and her baggage.
Are you a Conspiracy theory kind of guy???

i don't think there was any big conspiracy theories around it, but if you look at how many super-delegates pledged to Hillary early on you can see that there is a large (much larger than Obama) party establishment base hoping that she wins. Obama's only hope is to pick up enough pledged delegates and undecided supers before the DNC.
Actually, once super delegates have "committed themselves" to a candiadate, they are NOT locked in.Most of the ones committed to Hillary Clinton, did so long ago when she was seen as the Inevitable nominee, long before the idea that Barack Obama was considered a viable candidate for the nomination. They CAN change their minds at ANY time, including the night of the convention when they have to vote. Hypothetically, say Barack Obama goes into the convention with MORE pledged(delegates won in the primaries) delegates than Senator Clinton. Now super delegates are the Big Wigs of the party, for instance, all memebrs of congress, democratic governors etc. I think the LAST thing the Democratic Party wants is for it to look like the voters in the Democratic party have chosen one candidate, the one with the most Pledged delegates, and for the bigwigs(superdelegates) to say they are wrong and override the will of the people and throw their support behind Hillary Clinton. Remember, most super delegates are ELECTED officials and their votes would be public. Elected officials are obsessed with being RE-ELECTED and they would have to answer to their constituents for their vote for the candidate with less pledged delegates...
 

D_Gunther Snotpole

Account Disabled
Joined
Oct 3, 2005
Posts
13,632
Media
0
Likes
75
Points
193
Don't for a second fool yourself into some misguided belief that the Dems plan to allow Obama a full win. Neither Clinton nor Obama will have the necessary number of delegates to secure the nomination on their own.

Too early to say whether either will have enough. Obama could be quite significantly ahead by the time of the convention -- and if he is, many of those super delegates will vote for him rather than invite the wrath of party members and contempt of the voting public by defeating the popular will within the party.
I don't say he will be ahead ... just that he clearly could be.
This whole primary season has been unpredictable.

Where does it leave us in the end? 60% chance (I never guarantee anything) of next January watching term #3 of Republican leadership in the form of Johnny McCain and his Veep Mike Huckabee [Huckabee is the key to securing Republican votes, since: A) He can grab the conservatives and fundamentalists and B) McCain is getting up in years, the relative youth of Huckabee will balance that on the campaign trail]. It'll be a squeaker; but, McCain/Huckabee will win over Clinton and her baggage.

A McCain victory wouldn't surprise me or bother me that much, though I do hope the Dems win.