tall woman, big cock
- Thread starter bigschlotsky
- Start date
D_Maurice Mountlilly
Account Disabled
in my experiences the three tall women i've slept with two out of the three had no problem having sex with me but the shortest of them did(she was 5'11 the others were 6ft. and 6'1)i had sex with her in the dark with her on her stomach while i stroked her from behined, afterwards i turned the light on and she was cryin' her eyes in her pillow.and then for the next three months we tried every positon out and she still didn't like having sex with me.we broke up but we're still good friends..as a matter of fact she hooked me with the girl i dated that was 6ft. tall
beachbumamy
Experimental Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2006
- Posts
- 31
- Media
- 17
- Likes
- 4
- Points
- 153
- Location
- Orlando, FL
- Sexuality
- 50% Straight, 50% Gay
- Gender
- Female
Wow, this thread has been going for a while. I think you like what you like and each woman is different...there is no way externally to tell how big a woman's vaginal cavity is. So all you can do is talk to the woman to find out what she prefers...as for me I like large...
I heard that tall guys have bigger cocks, short guys have no cocks, asian guys have small cocks, black guys have the biggest cocks, and that tall women have bigger boobs than short women.
:wink:
:wink:
I had tall and short women, with both I had easy going and hard to push vaginas, só no correlaction...And both liked large ones, but some handled it all and some didnt, no matter how tall.
thehighheelsgirl
Sexy Member
I'm 5 3 and I love big cocks! I do have friends who are short and tall who don't like big dicks, so I think it just depends on the girl?
Jen
Jen
Marlboro woman
Experimental Member
If there is a correlation then it hasn't stopped me from undergoing the misfortune of going home with a pindick on more occasions than I care to remember :frown1:
Since data shows that taller guys 'tend' (some correlation) to have bigger dicks, then it's reasonable to believe taller women will 'tend' to have bigger vaginas. That should then translate into at least a correlation existing between size desire and height, though it may become diluted (weakened correlation) in the translation. Isolated instances posted about do not apply well when figuring out if an overall correlation exists or not.
No.
That's why you have to do something called "study". You won't like it, and it's a little dull, but it'll make it so you stop making such dull conjecture amongst colleagues.
I can and do produce data backing up what I post about penis size and height. I did connect some dots from there, but they're not unreasonable. Does anyone else produce data or much of anything really backing themselves up concerning correlations when they post or when they disagree with me? Nope. I receive the negative comments because my post doesn't happen to be on the politically correct side of things. Those who post much less, or no, validation recieve no negative comments simply because they are posting on the politically correct side of things.
Just my 612.60 Zimbabwe Dollars worth,
Based on my admitedly layman's research, the vagina (that thing we poke with our prods) is the inverse of the penis (that thing we guys discovered after the novelty of sucking our thumbs in the uterus wore off). There are size differences between one person and another. These differences may or may not be linked to the overall size and/or body structure of the person involved. Many times they aren't.
The main thing to remember is that the vagina, like the penis, is "elastic". Just as a man's penis has different sizes, so to does a woman's vagina. However, unlike the erect penis, a woman's "erect" vagina has the ability to mold itself to the optimum size and remain there for the duration of intercourse (within its normal inborn genetic parameters, of course) granted that it is given enough time to adjust to the size it's receiving, vaginal "erection" being much slower than penile erection.
Think about it for a second. The vaginal canal is able to pass a full term baby. This is an extreme example, as childbirth usually entails a great deal of pain. As Carol Burnett once said, "Imagine your lower lip being pulled up over your head". However, despite this, many women deliver vaginally without any extreme change in the size of their vaginal canal. Certainly there is occaisional tearing at the vaginal entrance that requires suturing, but the main part remains intact and eventually recedes to its normal size.
Whenever you hear a guy say, "My girlfriend's pussy is so stretched out on accout of (her ex being hung like a elephant) OR (her having sixteen kids)" you can safely assume that he's undersized.
AAARRGH!!
I tend to get wordy when I'm tired, sorry.
I guess what I'm getting at is that most women of any height can physically accomodate various sizes of cocks and still feel fulfilled within their pre-dispositioned range (which has little bearing on their height).
The only physical research I can confirm is that my "very petite" wife (4' 10") had trouble handling me at first (about 7.5", ruler laid across the top, if that's the way to measure?). I used to "hit bottom" on a regular basis at the beginning of our relationship, but rarely do anymore (she seems to enjoy it even more.
I can only conclude that she has elongated to accomodate me. The grip about the girth is still the same.
Based on my admitedly layman's research, the vagina (that thing we poke with our prods) is the inverse of the penis (that thing we guys discovered after the novelty of sucking our thumbs in the uterus wore off). There are size differences between one person and another. These differences may or may not be linked to the overall size and/or body structure of the person involved. Many times they aren't.
The main thing to remember is that the vagina, like the penis, is "elastic". Just as a man's penis has different sizes, so to does a woman's vagina. However, unlike the erect penis, a woman's "erect" vagina has the ability to mold itself to the optimum size and remain there for the duration of intercourse (within its normal inborn genetic parameters, of course) granted that it is given enough time to adjust to the size it's receiving, vaginal "erection" being much slower than penile erection.
Think about it for a second. The vaginal canal is able to pass a full term baby. This is an extreme example, as childbirth usually entails a great deal of pain. As Carol Burnett once said, "Imagine your lower lip being pulled up over your head". However, despite this, many women deliver vaginally without any extreme change in the size of their vaginal canal. Certainly there is occaisional tearing at the vaginal entrance that requires suturing, but the main part remains intact and eventually recedes to its normal size.
Whenever you hear a guy say, "My girlfriend's pussy is so stretched out on accout of (her ex being hung like a elephant) OR (her having sixteen kids)" you can safely assume that he's undersized.
AAARRGH!!
I tend to get wordy when I'm tired, sorry.
I guess what I'm getting at is that most women of any height can physically accomodate various sizes of cocks and still feel fulfilled within their pre-dispositioned range (which has little bearing on their height).
The only physical research I can confirm is that my "very petite" wife (4' 10") had trouble handling me at first (about 7.5", ruler laid across the top, if that's the way to measure?). I used to "hit bottom" on a regular basis at the beginning of our relationship, but rarely do anymore (she seems to enjoy it even more
.I can only conclude that she has elongated to accomodate me. The grip about the girth is still the same.
Of the dozen women I've had sex with the woman who took me like nothing was the tallest I've been with, about 6 ft tall, and the one who I actually reached bottom with for a moment (she became very excited at that moment and then apparently exapanded even more -out of reach) was a little over 5' tall. I could take that experience and then say "... therefore taller women so and so and shorter women so and so" like so others draw their conclusions on. Instead I attempt to gather in as much other info as available, plus related info that may be helpful, and package it all up to see what the picture becomes. Then I'm met with posts such as "There isn't any evidence the doctor studies have been peer reviewed", or the posters' hand pick which study or research to disagree with, so as to make it seem like less than what I've posted, or they only bring up some anecdotal I mentioned at some time in some thread (yet they don't ever question it as anecdotal from those that they agree with), ignoring almost everything else I've posted, or they simply disagree with no back up, or a mixed combination of any of the above. And on and on it goes...
