Tallbig banned?

[Not_Punny]

This has GOT to be the STUPIDEST FUCKING THING that I've heard in a long fucking time.

NOT FAIR.

I guess it's ok to have thousands of threads about "Am I big?" and "What kind of boxers..."

But heaven forbid that anyone post some threads that people can actually talk in.

Whoever arranged this banning -- I have one thing to say to you: Rot in your little pond of stagnant poop.

 

[snoozan]

he had multiple identities.

if you look in his overpopulation thread, there's a post from "ihavebeautifulcock" or something like that who is also banned and posts exactly the same way tallbig does.

pecker posted about this in another thread.

 

[Tattooed Goddess]

He was a nice guy, just went a little overboard on posting. Seemed to be so proud to hit 1,000 posts in one month. It gets old reading one line posts just for the sheer sake of racking up posts.

I dont know if that alone deserved banning, but it should have deserved maybe a little repremand for going overboard. But if he had multiple identities and was doing other things, i can understand this decision by Admin.

 

[BigDuder]

bedheadred is clearly upping her post count though multpiple posts. id rather read oneliners

 

[SpeedoGuy]

id rather read oneliners

and i'd rather peer at her avatar.

 

[SpoiledPrincess]

It's clearly stated that having multiple accounts is a no no, he should have had the sense to stick with being one person, there are very few reasons for multiple id's apart from the desire to make mischief.

 

[Not_Punny]

Thanks Snoozan. Hmmmm -- well, I guess an administrator could look up the IP address of all the accounts, but I don't think the STYLE is necessarily the only thing. Tallbig wasn't the ONLY user who lacked capital letters (BigDude is an example of someone who doesn't use uppercase very much).

Anyway, I think it was too harsh. Suspension as well as cancellation of the multiple accounts would have been more fair.

I hope he comes back as someone else. I think this was ridiculous.

- - - - - - - -

BHR -- I hear ya. But I don't necessarily agree with your statement that he had unfairly gotten higher postings. A good 15% of my posts are from scrabble/word games (check out the Funny Forum) and a lot of members play/flirt in threads which can really rack up postings. So, I wouldn't bash the one liners or I'll have to smack that lovely butt of yours!

 

[Tattooed Goddess]

Ha ha you guys are sooooooo mean! Im taking my pics down! Just kidding, the site was froze up on me, so i made the mistake of hitting the button twice. Well fuck me silly for doing it!

 

[rob_just_rob]

Wow, I'm surprised....













... that we actually found out why someone was banned.

 

[Not_Punny]

No kidding...!

 

[snoozan]

Wow, I'm surprised....













... that we actually found out why someone was banned.

i really appreciate it, and i think it's a step in the right direction.

 

[Principessa]

This has GOT to be the STUPIDEST FUCKING THING that I've heard in a long fucking time.

NOT FAIR. Seriously?? I'm glad! He was a major nuisance and an annoyance and he clearly broke the rules as Snoozan has already stated.

I guess it's ok to have thousands of threads about "Am I big?" and "What kind of boxers..." In the Young & Hung and New Member Introductions forums, yes that's fine. Underwear, Clothing and Appearance Issues would be the correct forum for "What Kind of Boxers?" None of these things should be posted in Women's Issues. :smile:

But heaven forbid that anyone post some threads that people can actually talk in. They were poorly written and intentionally divisive.

Whoever arranged this banning -- I have one thing to say to you: Rot in your little pond of stagnant poop.

If that's what you call entertainment or nteresting I'd hate to see what you think is crap.

 

[B_Think_Kink]

That's life. I kinda just ignored his threads in the end. Some were thoughtful, but alas one must play by the rules.

 

[B_NineInchCock_160IQ]

everyone always assumes that the decision to ban somebody has to do with them annoying someone. That's almost never the case. There's always more to the story, just because you didn't see something worth banning a person for doesn't mean that there was no good reason for it. Stop jumping to conclusions, people.

 

[Tattooed Goddess]

I also dont like it when people get offended easily like he did and then go to another board and go bitch about how people are so mean to him. Taddling and sympathy posts get on my nerves. People get so easily offended when they have their cocks out.

 

[BigDuder]

first they came for tallbig and i said nothing...

 

[D_alex8]

It's clearly stated that having multiple accounts is a no no, he should have had the sense to stick with being one person, there are very few reasons for multiple id's apart from the desire to make mischief.

With regard to the last part, that certainly applies to his ID "averageaverage", which he used to pose the question "Who is the most annoying member?".... effectively little more than an act of self-promotion designed to draw further attention towards his 'tallbig' ID.

 

[HazelGod]

i really appreciate it, and i think it's a step in the right direction.

Agreed.

 

[D_Geffarde Phartsmeller]

When was he banned and why, specifically? He was a bit annoying with posts about damn near anything that popped into his head but basically harmless. I can think of alot of others that should be banned long before him. And what about the various fakes? Someone that posts alot gets banned but not someone that misleads others for perverse sex fantasies? This site is going straight to hell and I doubt I'll come back to it when I return from Japan.

 

[B_NineInchCock_160IQ]

::sniffle::