NO.
Just as there is no correlation between height in men and penis size, there is no correlation in women between height and vaginal length.
I'm 5'9", and I absolutely, positively cannot take more than 8 inches. Period. I know there are shorter girls who can take more. However, there are also taller girls who can take more, and shorter girls who can take less.
Most often, you probably won't know until you have sex with a woman how much she can take. And even if she's open to talking with you about it beforehand, that may not mean anything. Some women can take more than they think -- they have just never tried it at a high state of arousal.
Thundersplace has polled over 1300 of it's members and there is a correlation between height and penis size. The correlation concerning average size is very mild between short and tall guys, as the tall guys have only 1/4" of an inch more in length than short guys, and tall guys have only 1/8" of an inch more in length than average height guys. That's not much (but it is a correlation).
Where the strength of the correlation takes a jump upward is in the outliners on the chart. In other the words, the percentage of tall guys with above average and bigger dicks is a significantly higher percentage than percentage of shorter guys with above average and longer dicks. Also, taller guys have a lower percentage of short dicks, shorter guys have a higher pecentage of short dicks. Guys of average height fall inbetween tall and short guys when it comes to percentage of short and long dicks. The outliner percentages indicate a moderate correlation strength.
Also, another site called sizesurvey has conducted the height poll with 3100 guys and the correlation is also observed. It's somewhat even stronger at sizesurvey, but the strength level at Thundersplace should be considered the one to go by as Thundersplace has proven itself to be very reputable when it comes to penis size measurements as their penis size measurement chart closely matches doctors' penis size studies and that indicates Thundersplace height vs dick size chart can be trusted.
There are indeed many short guys with bigger than average and big, and there are indeed many tall guys with shorter than average and small, but just because there are doesn't mean a correlation can't exist. A correlation is observed when the curve on the chart is pulled off course by some factor (in this case height). How much it is pulled off course determines the strength level of correlation.
Since there is correlation between height and dick size, there very well may be one between vagina depth and height. Once again, a correlation is just that -a correlation. It's not an absolute and a correlation strength can range from weak to mild to moderate to strong to very strong. I have found that many pepole have an all or nothing mentality about correlations. In other words, it there are tall women who can't take as much as some short women, and if there are tall guys with short ones and short guys with long ones, then they think a correlation can't exist. They clearly show they have no idea what the term means, or refuse to be objective about the term.
I've also found that those who are prone to think pc (politically correct) tend to have this all or nothing way of thinking when it comes to correlations. It's a right brain thinking mechanism that tends to think in wholes. Somehow those charts carry no weight with them. My post about this will be rejected and the posts in the future will continue to be that there cannot possibly be a correlation. Posts/misinformation/opinions/limited experience observations will continue widespread that correlations between flaccid and erect, height and penis size, length and girth, shoe and penis size, cannot, do not, exist. Well those have all been looked at indepth and there are correlations in all of them. The height vs penis length is a moderate one, the flaccid vs erect is a strong one, the length vs girth is a strong one, and the shoe size vs penis size is a mild one.
Carry on.