Originally posted by nitsud+Oct 11 2005, 07:42 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(nitsud @ Oct 11 2005, 07:42 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'>Originally posted by dlcs@Oct 11 2005, 07:57 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-nitsud@Oct 10 2005, 09:24 PM
I'm cut and have never burn oh junior, but have burned the old ass. och
[post=350439]Quoted post[/post]
For some reason I think of an overcooked Johnsonville Brat.
[post=350673]Quoted post[/post]
Er, can I ask where you read this?Originally posted by bad_axe_ff@Oct 12 2005, 07:16 AM
I think I am going to take my chances naked. The risk is not tanning, but not going out in the sun at all! You have a greater risk of skin cancer if you do not tan. I read this earlier when I was looking it up!
[post=350752]Quoted post[/post]
Good luck with that. Got fingers crossed that you'll be okay.Originally posted by Pecker@Oct 13 2005, 04:11 PM
Fastforward to last month, Sept 2005. My dermatologist, having checked every square inch of my skin, has found a few 'troublesome' spots which are pre-cancerous. They will have to be removed. (My forearms popped out with moles and bumps that dry and flake away constantly, then it spread almost all over me.) Now I have to use a thick cream everywhere I can reach on my body every day - the prescription costs $125 for a month's supply, just to moisturize these spots. This regimen will continue for a year, when I'll have another going-over by the dermatologist. In the meantime I have to prepare to have those aforementioned pre-cancerous things burned away.
[post=351402]Quoted post[/post]
This is what I was trying to say - No sunlight can cause a deficiency in Vitamin A production. But that really is just for people who almost never go out in the sunOriginally posted by college22punk9@Oct 14 2005, 07:27 AM
The only other thing I can comment about being more likely to get cancer if you tan as opposed to not tanning, might be if you were NEVER exposed to sunlight, which your skin DOES need at some levels to produce a number of things within the cells. Maybe if you weren't exposed to ANY light, that these things wouldn't be made, and you might have an increase risk in cancer? I dunno.. I'm still waiting to hear your source.
[post=351611]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by TtheAmazing@Oct 10 2005, 12:45 PM
Hey dude, so i'm not a tanning guy at all, I do to much theatre to get a tan ever, and a tan for me would be an obvious fake, BUT, you should get one of these http://www.jocksock.net/about_whatis_qt.htm if you want to get a full tan without killing the happy package.
In summary, your penis and testicles are very very sensitive (as we all know) and tanning FULLY nude can do all kinds of BAD things for your set. So, get one of those jocksocks before you tan "nude".
Be safe,
T
[post=350307]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by Otis88+Oct 19 2005, 04:24 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Otis88 @ Oct 19 2005, 04:24 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-surferboy@Oct 18 2005, 03:07 AM
Also...why go to a tanning bed place? Why not like, ya know...lay out in the sun? I'm pretty shure goin to a tanning salon is WAY more damaging than the sun.
[post=352818]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by surferboy+Oct 19 2005, 12:38 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(surferboy @ Oct 19 2005, 12:38 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'>Originally posted by Otis88@Oct 19 2005, 04:24 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-surferboy@Oct 18 2005, 03:07 AM
Also...why go to a tanning bed place? Why not like, ya know...lay out in the sun? I'm pretty shure goin to a tanning salon is WAY more damaging than the sun.
[post=352818]Quoted post[/post]
plus, a real tan looks much better than a fake one.
[post=353224]Quoted post[/post]