Tea Party and Race:A study

Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Posts
106
Media
0
Likes
1
Points
53
excuse me while I scratch my balls and yawn ...

now, what pray tell, does any of this have to do with the issues?

or, is this simply an ad hominem attack attempt by the left to discredit dialogue contrary to the Obama policies and practices?

I think it's pretty relevant if 60% of those in this "tea party movement" are there because of racism rather than legitimate concern. Don't you?

And the article's pointing that out; who says it has to be about another specific issue? That's very socialist and authoritarian of you to try to dictate what someone writes about, isn't it?

But hey, maybe someone will give a serious response to the tea partiers when they actually come up with an organized effort on a certain issue other than "freedom" or "socialism" or whatever other word of the day is on their toilet paper.
 

ZOS23xy

Sexy Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2007
Posts
4,906
Media
3
Likes
29
Points
258
Location
directly above the center of the earth
Let's stir up the pot a little further:


Black conservative tea party backers take heat


ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) - They've been called Oreos, traitors and Uncle Toms, and are used to having to defend their values. Now black conservatives are really taking heat for their involvement in the mostly white tea party movement—and for having the audacity to oppose the policies of the nation's first black president.
"I've been told I hate myself. I've been called an Uncle Tom. I've been told I'm a spook at the door," said Timothy F. Johnson, chairman of the Frederick Douglass Foundation, a group of black conservatives who support free market principles and limited government.

"Black Republicans find themselves always having to prove who they are. Because the assumption is the Republican Party is for whites and the Democratic Party is for blacks," he said...
 

maxcok

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Posts
7,153
Media
0
Likes
125
Points
83
Location
Elsewhere
Gender
Male
^ Actually . . . . they's a few other dudes on here I strongly suspect.

They mostly list themselves as 100% straight though. Imagine that.
 
5

546820

Guest
The fact that Obongo even gets called "non-white" shows we are not a post-racial society. It's still all about the one drop rule, apparently.
 

Industrialsize

Mythical Member
Gold
Platinum Gold
Joined
Dec 23, 2006
Posts
22,244
Media
213
Likes
31,791
Points
618
Location
Kathmandu (Bagmati Province, Nepal)
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male

D_Davy_Downspout

Account Disabled
Joined
Dec 5, 2004
Posts
1,136
Media
0
Likes
18
Points
183
The fact that Obongo even gets called "non-white" shows we are not a post-racial society. It's still all about the one drop rule, apparently.

It would be inaccurate to call him "white", so what do you propose?

Regardless, the idea of us living in a post-racial society is fanciful, but it's not the fault of the people calling him "black".
 

maxcok

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Posts
7,153
Media
0
Likes
125
Points
83
Location
Elsewhere
Gender
Male
Choke on a dick, faggot.
Well, he didn't last long. Some people, I tell ya.


issues <

She sounds like a self-hating nigger lover. Find a new roommate, preferably one who is not a racist.

Suck on this dick, slut.

Not sure I want to stay on a site where any controversial opinions are censored.

Buh -bye!
 
Last edited:

b.c.

Worshipped Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Nov 7, 2005
Posts
20,540
Media
0
Likes
21,780
Points
468
Location
at home
Verification
View
Gender
Male
That's my favorite part... Yet when you ask these people to identify in detail what 'principles' it is that we had before, that we no longer have, they have no fucking clue.

Well, M.Rico didn't suggest that America has [strayed] from "founding principles" but that some of these folks believe we have. That in essence is the problem with them. They seem to want to apply so-called "principles" willy-nilly as they see fit.

They had no problem, for example, with a Supreme Court ruling that literally handed over the presidency to GWB, nor another that gives corporations unlimited financial leverage in their dealings with elected officials. And no problem with the idea of government dole outs (er, pardon, "vouchers") to cover the cost of a private school education. "Principles be damned" in those cases.

However, a healtcare proposal designed to provide for greater coverage of most Americans, WHILE ALLOWING THE REST OF US TO KEEP OUR EXISTING PLANS is in their minds a violation of one's rights - to go to one's grave without a piss-worth's of coverage. "Socialism" they call it.
 
D

deleted15807

Guest
Well, M.Rico didn't suggest that America has [strayed] from "founding principles" but that some of these folks believe we have.

Indeed it has strayed from it's 'founding principles'. Women, minorities and gays knew their duty, to be invisible. And now they're not and it upsets a lot of people.

The conjunction of a black president and a female speaker of the House — topped off by a wise Latina on the Supreme Court and a powerful gay Congressional committee chairman — would sow fears of disenfranchisement among a dwindling and threatened minority in the country

~

When you hear demonstrators chant the slogan “Take our country back!,” these are the people they want to take the country back from.


-Frank Rich


 

AquaEyes11010

Expert Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2007
Posts
787
Media
10
Likes
167
Points
263
Location
New Brunswick (New Jersey, United States)
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
It has nothing to do with the issues.

It is spin by the Obama machine.
Disagree with Obama and you will be smeared.

How do you smear ordinary Americans that have families and pay taxes and are disgusted with those who are supposed to be representing them?
Obviously they are ignorant racists.
We even have a poll from a university that "proves" that.

The poll is bullshit.

Kind of reminds me of how the right labelled anyone who was vocally against Bush during his two terms as being anti-american, anti-troops, etc. Opposition to the party in power will always have things thrown at them. However, the anti-Bush people were being told that criticizing the president was un-American, despite it being a very American thing to do, while in this case, we're calling the funny costume-wearing people names that refer to them having lessened abilities at rational thought. Hmmm.....

I haven't been paying that much attention to the tea-bag movement because of a mental block I have on taking them seriously, so I can't say what I think about on what their opinions are really based. The few times I've caught them on the news I can tell that they're angry about something, but (from the little I've seen) they seem to be spouting things out randomly and without much regard to structuring their arguments with facts.

Angry people in funny costumes yelling their opinions about things not working in their favor. OK, I can see how racism could possibly fit, but I don't have any supporting information to link them to it.
 

AquaEyes11010

Expert Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2007
Posts
787
Media
10
Likes
167
Points
263
Location
New Brunswick (New Jersey, United States)
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male

This vid of Teabagger signs is revealing and disturbing, but it has a pleasant bluegrassy soundtrack:




Isn't "racism" basically when someone has negative connotations about another ethnic group, and assigns those negative connotations to every member of the group? OK, so the video shows racist tea-baggers, but to extend that to saying that the entire tea-bag movement is racist is....well, kinda racist. It's like Bill Maher has often said: Republicans aren't all, or even mostly, racists, but a lot of racists find their home in the Republican party.