1
1337357
Guest
Talking about penis length is a simple thing: you’re talking about how long it is from base to tip. Some people may lie about that, but we’re never confused about what is at issue.
Yet, talking about girth is more complicated. Take two guys: one is 5 x 5, the other is 7 x 5. The second guy is doubtless longer, but if you were to look at the two you’d swear that the first has more girth. But he doesn’t. His shorter length makes his 5” girth more impressive than the other (longer) guy’s 5” girth. But their girth is, in fact, just the same.
Is there a way to talk intelligibly about this situation. The 5 x 5 guy is not actually girthier. So should we say “chubbier” or “more rotund”? And might this distinction help clarify our assessment of dick size?
Just wondering if anyone has some insight here...
Yet, talking about girth is more complicated. Take two guys: one is 5 x 5, the other is 7 x 5. The second guy is doubtless longer, but if you were to look at the two you’d swear that the first has more girth. But he doesn’t. His shorter length makes his 5” girth more impressive than the other (longer) guy’s 5” girth. But their girth is, in fact, just the same.
Is there a way to talk intelligibly about this situation. The 5 x 5 guy is not actually girthier. So should we say “chubbier” or “more rotund”? And might this distinction help clarify our assessment of dick size?
Just wondering if anyone has some insight here...