Testicle size calculator

guywithbigballs

Worshipped Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Apr 23, 2012
Posts
667
Media
46
Likes
13,961
Points
523
Location
Birmingham, UK
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Testicle dimensions (5.5 x 3 x 3 cm) x 0.71 = 35.1 ml, corresponding to 82.4 percentile (0.93 standard deviations above the mean).
 
I found it hard to measure the size but these numbers should be quite close:

Testicle dimensions (5 x 3 x 3.5 cm) x 0.71 = 37.3 ml, corresponding to 74.9 percentile (0.67 standard deviations above the mean).

It looks like the mean of my age group is a lot higher than that of something1122's age group which makes me doubt the underlying data (unless it's true that the testicles start to grow a lot from the age of 21 :D)
 
I don't know where they get the measurements, but this doesn't seem very accurate. I squeezed my scrotum tightly so one testicle was exposed and popped out tightly against the skin and measured it several times and at different angles. According to their results it measured 170.4 ml, corresponding to 100 percentile (6.91 standard deviations above the mean). Of course I am off their chart on the age scale.
 
That's the way I measured, but I accomodated for the skin at either end of my balls. That makes your balls seem quite a bit longer than they really are. Mine measure in the order of 6x3x4 giving 51.1 ml as the result, corresponding to 83.1 percentile (0.96 standard deviations above the mean).
Yours seem smaller than mine, so I'm curious how you got over 3 times the volume.
 
Here are my data:
Testicle dimensions (4.7 x 3.6 x 3.3 cm) x 0.71 = 39.6 ml, corresponding to 90.5 percentile (1.31 standard deviations above the mean).
 
Do W, H and D mean Width, Height and Diameter?

I'm a little confused, shouldn't one of the measurements be length?

It seems like width and diameter are the same thing.

And why does average testicle volume increase as you age, I thought they just got saggier, not actually larger?
 
That's the way I measured, but I accomodated for the skin at either end of my balls. That makes your balls seem quite a bit longer than they really are. Mine measure in the order of 6x3x4 giving 51.1 ml as the result, corresponding to 83.1 percentile (0.96 standard deviations above the mean).
Yours seem smaller than mine, so I'm curious how you got over 3 times the volume.
Mine measure 8x5x6. So if I subtract some for skin as you suggest I tried calculating this with 7.5x4.5x5.5 and got 131.8 ml, corresponding to 100 percentile (5.1 standard deviations above the mean). When tight my entire scrotum is larger than a baseball.
 
Here are my data:
Testicle dimensions (4.7 x 3.6 x 3.3 cm) x 0.71 = 39.6 ml, corresponding to 90.5 percentile (1.31 standard deviations above the mean).

The above were the measurements of my right testicle. I just measured my left one and that seems to be a little bigger:
Testicle dimensions (5.0 x 3.6 x 3.4 cm) x 0.71 = 43.5 ml, corresponding to 94.6 percentile (1.61 standard deviations above the mean).
 
I measure 3 x 4 x 5 cm which is the 92.3 percentile.

Why does it multiply the number by 0.71 before telling you the percentile?

And I still think the data's iffy, testicles don't get bigger as you age, which means that what's actually happening is that the testicle size has been decreasing each year for some reason, maybe it's the increased amount of estrogen hormones thingies in all the plastics and stuff?

Dunno, it seems weird.
 
Really?

I gotta say, I never would've guess that from your photos, how big are your hands?
I have fairly big hands and wear a size XXL glove. BTW, I just measured the circumference of my scrotum when tight - 11 inches. Which makes it a little smaller than a American softball (12 inches) and bigger than a baseball (9 inches).
 
I understood D to mean depth. H = height, W = width, D = depth. Are people measuring differently?

I took the measurements according to my understanding and got 39.something, I didn't really care about the value because I don't see any way that this calculator could come up with a reliable result. It doesn't really define what you should be measuring and it doesn't account for contours, assuming you are measuring the entire scrotum. Depending on my state, the upper portion of my scrotum is much thinner than the lower portion, where my testicles are. I assume this is true for anybody but I don't see how a simple calculator that doesn't account for that difference can produce a result that's worth anything other than novelty.
 
I understood D to mean depth. H = height, W = width, D = depth

Testicle dimensions (5 x 4.45 x 4.45 cm) x 0.71 = 70.3 ml, corresponding to 100 percentile (3.41 standard deviations above the mean).

I never considered mine large.