Texas politics

[SonyToyo]

Pollsters trying to figure


I've seen it. It's just one of O'keefe's poorly edited hackjobs.

The caravan is 900 miles away from the US-Mexico border. They aren't expected to reach here for another month.

The donations were to a catholic charity that helps immigrant families & asylum seekers after they're released from ICE detention. Those are the people they were referring to in the video. The caravan is nowhere near here yet.

So the money is going to illegal immigrants?

Lmao what a PR disaster

 

[IntactMale]

So the money is going to illegal immigrants?

Lmao what a PR disaster

Reading comprehension hasn't gotten much better in the time you've been gone. The "illegal immigrants" are detained by ICE and released. If you have a problem with those people being released then your problem is with ICE and not the immigrants. And your problem with the money is associated with the catholic charity, but I'm guessing you won't argue with the machine of ignorance that finances you political party.

 

[Klingsor]

Did you even read what you posted and watch the video? Lmao.

It says that the money is helping the caravan basically.
The illegal caravan people denied the offer of asylum in Mexico. I hope they’re turned back at all costs.

Interesting that you're so worked up about events on the other side of the world.

That's all; just interesting.

 

[SonyToyo]

Interesting that you're so worked up about events on the other side of the world.

That's all; just interesting.

I’m not worked up.

Not like you when you were hyperventilating that Australia is supposed crawling with “white nationalists”

 

[SonyToyo]

Reading comprehension hasn't gotten much better in the time you've been gone. The "illegal immigrants" are detained by ICE and released. If you have a problem with those people being released then your problem is with ICE and not the immigrants. And your problem with the money is associated with the catholic charity, but I'm guessing you won't argue with the machine of ignorance that finances you political party.

The problem is Democrats sending funds to people who tried and succeeded at crossing the US border illegally.

How you fail to understand simple concepts isn’t beyond me. You’re a Democrat lol.

 

[IntactMale]

The problem is Democrats sending funds to people who tried and succeeded at crossing the US border illegally.

How you fail to understand simple concepts isn’t beyond me. You’re a Democrat lol.

I'm not a democrat, but I'm not extreme right so you can't understand it as anything but left.

If you think catholic and the left are aligned then you have really shown your ignorance. I imagine it won't be too long before this account gets banned as well. Nice of you to take a few months off though.

Looking at USAID.gov it would seem that Australia is accepting aid money from the United States. So maybe you should keep your opinion to yourself until the country in which you reside doesn't take handouts from the United States government.

Also, you should just get off this site. You were banned for a reason. Coming back after being banned, its kind of like crossing a border without authorization and getting the benefits of crossing that border. Seems like you must be in favor of open borders. Your identity politics are failing your behavior.

 

[SonyToyo]

I'm not a democrat, but I'm not extreme right so you can't understand it as anything but left.

If you think catholic and the left are aligned then you have really shown your ignorance. I imagine it won't be too long before this account gets banned as well. Nice of you to take a few months off though.

Looking at USAID.gov it would seem that Australia is accepting aid money from the United States. So maybe you should keep your opinion to yourself until the country in which you reside doesn't take handouts from the United States government.

Also, you should just get off this site. You were banned for a reason. Coming back after being banned, its kind of like crossing a border without authorization and getting the benefits of crossing that border. Seems like you must be in favor of open borders. Your identity politics are failing your behavior.

Why would I get banned? I’ve done nothing that the others haven’t done?

And the pope literally said that capitalism was a sin lol, your argument about catholocism is void. And the nation of Australia isn’t a group of criminal illegal immigrants.

 

[IntactMale]

You were already banned, I'm sure you got a summary of why that happened. It will happen again soon, so keep an eye on your spam filter.

Who cares what the pope says? Catholics are conservative, these terms are not interchangeable at this time. You don't understand what either progressiveness is or what Catholicism is so you don't understand. They don't exactly align and if you need explanation on that then you are only proving the point.

Australia accepts money from the US for doing nothing. That is the same thing you accuse "illegal immigrants" of. The only difference is that immigrants actually offer a benefit to the US. It's cheap labor, unfortunate for the immigrants but extremely beneficial to the US. In comparison, the aid sent to Australia is a bad investment. We get a worse ROI on you than an illegal immigrant. And we have to listen to your uninformed bullshit. You are a detriment.

 

[SonyToyo]

You’re hilarious. Illegal immigration costs the country billions every year and is a burden on the economy.
The only reason you put forward was slave labour lol.
And the only reason you want me banned is because you disgaree. You’re the one making threats and throwing insults. Maybe you should be banned.

 

[TexanStar]

The problem is Democrats sending funds to people who tried and succeeded at crossing the US border illegally.

How you fail to understand simple concepts isn’t beyond me. You’re a Democrat lol.

lol, this is that same "Don't feed stray dogs!" tone deafness that doesn't play well when you leave the echo chamber.

It's a religious charity helping people who are here seeking asylum, have been deemed not a threat and released to US soil by ICE while their asylum cases are being processed and/or approved, and have nothing but the clothes on their backs.

I know on right wing message boards these people are worth your derision, but the public at large doesn't buy into that hatred, even here in Texas.

 

[IntactMale]

You’re hilarious. Illegal immigration costs the country billions every year and is a burden on the economy.
The only reason you put forward was slave labour lol.
And the only reason you want me banned is because you disgaree. You’re the one making threats and throwing insults. Maybe you should be banned.

My last response didn't get posted for some reason.

I didn't say that I want you banned. I said that you were banned before and now you are back with a new name. I also said that you were banned before for a good reasons, and that bypassing the reason for which you were banned and coming in anyways is very similar to someone who illegally crosses a border. If you are against illegal immigration then your own behavior contradicts those beliefs.

Show me where I made a thread to you or anyone else. It didn't happen, that's why you didn't quote it.

I didn't make an argument about Catholicism, I only said that it is obviously not aligned with the left. If you think calling capitalism a sin means that the Catholic church is liberal then you need to read up on the subject. See how they feel about things like the use of condoms or abortion. Not to mention that being aligned with the left does not mean that you feel capitalism should be disassembled.

You are way of base regarding the economic burden of illegal immigration, but I wasn't even talking about that, and I said nothing about slave labor. I did say that those U.S. government handouts that you are so opposed to are also received by your country, so you don't have a leg to stand on. But you're going to ignore that point because your so deep in your own hypocrisy that you have no way of defending your points. You'll just continue to make up lies until you eventually go over the line again and get yourself banned again. And then you'll cross the border illegally again.

 

[Klingsor]

I’m not worked up.

Not like you when you were hyperventilating that Australia is supposed crawling with “white nationalists”

Since I never said anything like that, you may want to examine your hold on reality.

 

[SonyToyo]

My last response didn't get posted for some reason.

I didn't say that I want you banned. I said that you were banned before and now you are back with a new name. I also said that you were banned before for a good reasons, and that bypassing the reason for which you were banned and coming in anyways is very similar to someone who illegally crosses a border. If you are against illegal immigration then your own behavior contradicts those beliefs.

Show me where I made a thread to you or anyone else. It didn't happen, that's why you didn't quote it.

I didn't make an argument about Catholicism, I only said that it is obviously not aligned with the left. If you think calling capitalism a sin means that the Catholic church is liberal then you need to read up on the subject. See how they feel about things like the use of condoms or abortion. Not to mention that being aligned with the left does not mean that you feel capitalism should be disassembled.

You are way of base regarding the economic burden of illegal immigration, but I wasn't even talking about that, and I said nothing about slave labor. I did say that those U.S. government handouts that you are so opposed to are also received by your country, so you don't have a leg to stand on. But you're going to ignore that point because your so deep in your own hypocrisy that you have no way of defending your points. You'll just continue to make up lies until you eventually go over the line again and get yourself banned again. And then you'll cross the border illegally again.

Dude, I can’t even begin. You’re defending your points with rhetoric and I have no energy of time to keep going. You’re factually wrong on every point.

Who said I was banned for good reason? I think when feminists on this site insult your entire existence just for proving that the wage gap doesn’t exist because of sexism and misogyny, then they accuse you of pedophilia, maybe they’re the ones who should be banned? We all know that the abusive liberals and feminists on this site will never have to face up to their appalling behaviour because they have the “correct” opinions.
Being banned for defending yourself is an absolute joke. So no, it’s not like illegal immigration lmao. That’s the largest false equivalency you’ve presented.

I honestly don’t care about Catholicism, you seem to be “triggered” by it, for lack of a better word. I honestly don’t care. I’m just saying that the pope isn’t a conservative. You’re being a bit mental regarding the point I made.

I do have a way of defending my points, very easily. But I can’t be bothered, quite frankly. I’m not presenting hypocritical points. I’m just not validating your false-equivalencies.
Sending money to people who tried and failed to illegally enter the country is not the same as handing out foreign aid. It was never and will never be. It’s hilarious that you can’t see that.

I won’t be responding further because this is a waste of time.

 

[IntactMale]

Dude, I can’t even begin. You’re defending your points with rhetoric and I have no energy of time to keep going. You’re factually wrong on every point.

Who said I was banned for good reason? I think when feminists on this site insult your entire existence just for proving that the wage gap doesn’t exist because of sexism and misogyny, then they accuse you of pedophilia, maybe they’re the ones who should be banned? We all know that the abusive liberals and feminists on this site will never have to face up to their appalling behaviour because they have the “correct” opinions.
Being banned for defending yourself is an absolute joke. So no, it’s not like illegal immigration lmao. That’s the largest false equivalency you’ve presented.

I honestly don’t care about Catholicism, you seem to be “triggered” by it, for lack of a better word. I honestly don’t care. I’m just saying that the pope isn’t a conservative. You’re being a bit mental regarding the point I made.

I do have a way of defending my points, very easily. But I can’t be bothered, quite frankly. I’m not presenting hypocritical points. I’m just not validating your false-equivalencies.
Sending money to people who tried and failed to illegally enter the country is not the same as handing out foreign aid. It was never and will never be. It’s hilarious that you can’t see that.

I won’t be responding further because this is a waste of time.

I said you were banned for a good reasons. The moderators of the site said you were banned for a good reason. The people impacted by your trolling said you were banned for a good reason. And you're still here even though that means you are crossing a border you were told not to cross, which is equivalent to the humans you are attacking for crossing an imaginary line. But at least we know that you admit to being the person who was banned. @Industrialsize I would hope has some interest in this.

I don't care about Catholicism, you brought it up. You said that the Catholic Church was liberal because the pope said capitalism is a sin. You specifically said liberal, you did not say "not conservative", you are changing your words now because you were wrong. You said that and you can't defend that idiocy so you are backtracking now.

I didn't question your ability to defend your points. I don't think you've made an attempt to do so, but really, a good point doesn't require defense.

 

[SonyToyo]

I said you were banned for a good reasons. The moderators of the site said you were banned for a good reason. The people impacted by your trolling said you were banned for a good reason. And you're still here even though that means you are crossing a border you were told not to cross, which is equivalent to the humans you are attacking for crossing an imaginary line. But at least we know that you admit to being the person who was banned. @Industrialsize I would hope has some interest in this.

I don't care about Catholicism, you brought it up. You said that the Catholic Church was liberal because the pope said capitalism is a sin. You specifically said liberal, you did not say "not conservative", you are changing your words now because you were wrong. You said that and you can't defend that idiocy so you are backtracking now.

I didn't question your ability to defend your points. I don't think you've made an attempt to do so, but really, a good point doesn't require defense.

I don’t admit to anything actually. Never did. I’m just saying what has happened with my experience on this site. Banning someone for having a different view is the definition of bigotry. Making threats of banning actually violates the terms of service. I’m sure you’re not in the good position that you think you are.

 

[SonyToyo]

And just for the record, the fact that you had make bring my position on this site the focal point of your argument suggests that your arguments have zero weight.

 

[IntactMale]

I don’t admit to anything actually. Never did. I’m just saying what has happened with my experience on this site. Banning someone for having a different view is the definition of bigotry. Making threats of banning actually violates the terms of service. I’m sure you’re not in the good position that you think you are.

I didn't threaten to ban you, I don't have that ability. Again, I said that you were banned, and since then you've admitted that you were banned. I pointed out to you how that is very similar to someone illegally crossing a border. Please try to get me banned if you think I deserve it. You've already been banned, so we already know that you deserve it.

You did admit to being banned, you specifically cited the incident without provocation. I didn't give the specific detail that you did when describing the ban, you did. It's amazing how you were able to accurately describe the scenario in which someone was banned, in which you were banned, just by coincidence.

You should look up the definition of bigotry, you are wrong.

 

[IntactMale]

And just for the record, the fact that you had make bring my position on this site the focal point of your argument suggests that your arguments have zero weight.

That doesn't make any sense. The fact that me had make bring you position? I think you're trying to say that the fact that I made your position the focal point of my argument means that my arguments have zero weight. If that's what you are trying to say then you are just as stupid as what is implied by what you actually typed.

 

[SonyToyo]

I didn't threaten to ban you, I don't have that ability. Again, I said that you were banned, and since then you've admitted that you were banned. I pointed out to you how that is very similar to someone illegally crossing a border. Please try to get me banned if you think I deserve it. You've already been banned, so we already know that you deserve it.

You did admit to being banned, you specifically cited the incident without provocation. I didn't give the specific detail that you did when describing the ban, you did. It's amazing how you were able to accurately describe the scenario in which someone was banned, in which you were banned, just by coincidence.

You should look up the definition of bigotry, you are wrong.

I never admitted to being banned? Can you read? I’ve never been on this site before. I was talking about my experience so far and that it would be pretty rubbish if I was banned, considering the appalling behaviour of others.

Your arguments have no weight man. And I have looked up the definition. You fit it perfectly. “Intolerance towards opposing views”.

 

[SonyToyo]

That doesn't make any sense. The fact that me had make bring you position? I think you're trying to say that the fact that I made your position the focal point of my argument means that my arguments have zero weight. If that's what you are trying to say then you are just as stupid as what is implied by what you actually typed.

It’s what is happening. And there’s another insult. So threats and insults now hey?

You’re not lookin so good after tagging a mod. I’m not responding to you any further.