Have another look. At first glance it looks that way. But when you look closer you will see that the ruler at the base is in front of his penis. But it ends up behind the head. So he tilts the ruler backward leading to a significant higher number. He also starts at the 1 inch mark. So I agree 8-ish seems about right. Probably even 8.25 but that is hard to tell when people deliberately mess up their measurementsYou certainly know better than me. The first pic seems measured from the top right and not on the right side.
The only explanation I have is that the fat directly above my penis is somehow very weak. I can also easily push it back on a flat surfaceWonder why you got about half a cm more. I would think it should be identical. When I measured my fat pad depth yesterday both standing and lying flat, I got literally the exact same depth. Which likely means the starting point for NBP would be identical in both cases as well. In both instances, I had my feet the same distance apart, made sure to lock my knees and hold my hips in as straight a position as possible.
Only if 8.5" is very close to 10".There are some pics of him measured in Reddit. Definitely not 10 but very close to it.
Actually makes sense. Gravitiy makes your stomach flatter when lying on your back. Why not your pubic area as well.The only explanation I have is that the fat directly above my penis is somehow very weak. I can also easily push it back on a flat surface
I've made this comment before when we didn't have a definite requirement for BP v NBP that fatpads are much more easily compressed than most here were claiming; but I didn't convince anyone.The only explanation I have is that the fat directly above my penis is somehow very weak. I can also easily push it back on a flat surface
Maybe it is different for different people. For me it is identical. I did it multiple times again and even used a super thin kebab skewer (lol) to rest gently horizontally across my pubic area in both measurements to mark how deep the ruler went and make sure I was getting as precise and unaltered a comparison as possible between the two. Identical in both cases.The only explanation I have is that the fat directly above my penis is somehow very weak. I can also easily push it back on a flat surface
I tune out when people claim to have seen 2+ 10” dicks. They are not measuring. I’ve been told multiple times I’m that big and I’m far from it.Don't get me wrong, but I noticed that most guys here who defend the obviously fake dicks and wrong measured ones, and also the guys who have seen or had at least 1-2 guys with 10-11'' dicks - are pretty much all gay according to their profile description.
I am not homophobic at all - it's just an observation I made. So is that "10+ inch existence" just a fetish/fantasy thing? And therefore they don't want their fantasy destroyed? I am really curious.
I pretty much tune out anyone who says they’ve seen even one 9” dick seeing as how there’s maybe a dozen or so pics in the history of the web that could feasibly claim that. And most everyday people don’t even know about measuring/what bone-pressed is, etc. so they’re probably also throwing out these ridiculous numbers based just on visible length. Not saying that size or bigger can’t or doesn’t exist by any means.I tune out when people claim to have seen 2+ 10” dicks. They are not measuring. I’ve been told multiple times I’m that big and I’m far from it.
I’ve probably seen 250 dicks in the flesh and only thing one was over 9. So guys who say they’re running into one 10… doubtful but maybe … multiple, no.I pretty much tune out anyone who says they’ve seen even one 9” dick seeing as how there’s maybe a dozen or so pics in the history of the web that could feasibly claim that. And most everyday people don’t even know about measuring/what bone-pressed is, etc. so they’re probably also throwing out these ridiculous numbers based just on visible length. Not saying that size or bigger can’t or doesn’t exist by any means.
Statistically, 8" BP dicks are about 1 in 300 and 9" BP dicks are about 1 in 5,000. Finding a 9" BP is not easy but there are hundreds of them in any major city like London or NYC so if you offered a cash prize for measured pics of one you'd get it pretty quickly. 10" dicks work about to about 1 in 1,000,000 so there should be some of them around, just your odds of finding them are super low.I pretty much tune out anyone who says they’ve seen even one 9” dick seeing as how there’s maybe a dozen or so pics in the history of the web that could feasibly claim that. And most everyday people don’t even know about measuring/what bone-pressed is, etc. so they’re probably also throwing out these ridiculous numbers based just on visible length. Not saying that size or bigger can’t or doesn’t exist by any means.
Have to disagree on this common fat pad argument. It's not as simple as you put it.I've made this comment before when we didn't have a definite requirement for BP v NBP that fatpads are much more easily compressed than most here were claiming; but I didn't convince anyone.
I'm not saying we should go to BP but, you definitely can get your BP length used in sexual situations easily much to the contrary people were saying. Even if not every millimeter of that BP is used. A vast majority can be. One of the main points other than not seeing the 0 was BP is only for bragging and can't be used in sex.
Statistically, 8" BP dicks are about 1 in 300 and 9" BP dicks are about 1 in 5,000. Finding a 9" BP is not easy but there are hundreds of them in any major city like London or NYC so if you offered a cash prize for measured pics of one you'd get it pretty quickly. 10" dicks work about to about 1 in 1,000,000 so there should be some of them around, just your odds of finding them are super low.
I genuinely think the issue is simply that so few people have heard of this thread. I suspect if you put up a billboard in Times Square announcing the prize you'd get one, you'd just have to sort through millions of photos of penises that weren't 10" first.
You didn't disagree with me though. You just presented the other possibility that can occur which I never denied can happen but my situation is always denied as possible. It's actually quite simple. It's both my and your situations. I just dislike that one is made out to be a fabrication.Have to disagree on this common fat pad argument. It's not as simple as you put it.
Two guys with similar depth fat pads can have different results when pressing against it.
Similarly, another women with the same sized butt as me can act differently during sex. I exercise quite a bit - so my butt doesn't compress much when pushed against. If I didn't exercise, I'm sure my butt would almost compress to the bone.
Therefore the common "but my fat pad can be used during sex" argument isn't valid IMHO.
In respect to this thread, I've allowed for slight bonepressing as long as 0 is visible.
Useable length is somewhere between nbpel and bpel. To measure this you should have some device with a flat surface attached in 90 degrees to the start of a ruler. Measurements with this specialist device (if exists) would be virtually non existent given how difficult it is for most to find even a basic rulerYou didn't disagree with me though. You just presented the other possibility that can occur which I never denied can happen but my situation is always denied as possible. It's actually quite simple. It's both my and your situations. I just dislike that one is made out to be a fabrication.
So exercise less and get penetrated deeperHave to disagree on this common fat pad argument. It's not as simple as you put it.
Two guys with similar depth fat pads can have different results when pressing against it.
Similarly, another women with the same sized butt as me can act differently during sex. I exercise quite a bit - so my butt doesn't compress much when pushed against. If I didn't exercise, I'm sure my butt would almost compress to the bone.
Therefore the common "but my fat pad can be used during sex" argument isn't valid IMHO.
In respect to this thread, I've allowed for slight bonepressing as long as 0 is visible.
This is LPSG. I think chances are significant that what we get to see here is as good as it gets. Except maybe that real exception, that exception so rare we still haven’t seen it. So I don’t buy the 1 in a million, and I don’t buy the fact that not finding one is caused by the limited number of people having heard of this threadStatistically, 8" BP dicks are about 1 in 300 and 9" BP dicks are about 1 in 5,000. Finding a 9" BP is not easy but there are hundreds of them in any major city like London or NYC so if you offered a cash prize for measured pics of one you'd get it pretty quickly. 10" dicks work about to about 1 in 1,000,000 so there should be some of them around, just your odds of finding them are super low.
I genuinely think the issue is simply that so few people have heard of this thread. I suspect if you put up a billboard in Times Square announcing the prize you'd get one, you'd just have to sort through millions of photos of penises that weren't 10" first.
This is LPSG. I think chances are significant that what we get to see here is as good as it gets. Except maybe that real exception, that exception so rare we still haven’t seen it. So I don’t buy the 1 in a million, and I don’t buy the fact that not finding one is caused by the limited number of people having heard of this thread
Not only is it prominent on this site, but it gets plastered on other sites like Reddit as well. Which way, way more people use. Awareness is not an issue imo. If you have a seriously massive dick and want to show it off (obviously not everyone does) then within a week you should know what this thread is.