Exactly! That's why a "fluffed up" semi passing for a flaccid is a total deception, as well as why someone who has such an extreme curve which is diamond hard really isn't going to lose so much at 98% erect that they can't give a ballpark representation of their cloth tape size if they dare flatten their curve. I think most erections have a weird non-linear relation to length where the expansion tapers down to nothing once they're up in that higher range of hardness.
The $10,000 10-inch challenge
- Thread starter drambone2001
- Start date
Exactly! That's why a "fluffed up" semi passing for a flaccid is a total deception, as well as why someone who has such an extreme curve which is diamond hard really isn't going to lose so much at 98% erect that they can't give a ballpark representation of their cloth tape size if they dare flatten their curve. I think most erections have a weird non-linear relation to length where the expansion tapers down to nothing once they're up in that higher range of hardness.
Totally agree, in same cases people with extreme curves could "lose" size when rock hard so, yeah the excuse is total bullshit for me, i have upward curve, im not even close to 10 inch nbp, but im not gonna lie to myself, maybe if my cock would be completly straight without a curve i could "gain" 1 inch at most (being generous). Even if someone cant straighten up the curve at all, you could always take lot of time to do some math. For example :
- Measure the bending angle from the straight position to the current position.
- Identify the bending point and measure the distance from the bending point to the end of the cock.
- Use trigonometry to estimate the length of the cock without the curve, using the length of the straightened segment and the bending angle. Something like that could do.
Yeah, that puts you in a weird class anyway, and is why the only curved people that insist on using a tape are people with downward ones. Measuring along the curve from the top is only going to cheat you of length, and I think it's pretty well known that trying to measure from underneath is too much of a random crapshoot for any type of dick. The start point is too messy and dynamic, sort of like measuring on top while your shaft is angled downward.
And I thought it was part of the plan to give guys who are not like 10-13” their confidence back
anyway, thank you 
like2Feelabig1
Legendary Member
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2019
- Posts
- 453
- Media
- 3
- Likes
- 2,333
- Points
- 288
- Location
- London, England, GB
- Sexuality
- 100% Straight, 0% Gay
- Gender
- Female
Have you asked him, is he big enough and if so is he going to enter? Otherwise a totally pointless post, especially seeing as many people can't view it without creating an account there...
Looks obviously shopped and blurry too.
Yeah, that is bad. When the picture first came up, I thought it was darkened and greyed out because I needed to click on it or hit play. Red flag city when it comes to uploaded dick pictures.
@TinyPrincess so after 15k post, no one has been corageous to show his 10 inch fuck yet xd
But, ive a question for the queen of the thread, i know you are quite smart and knowledged woman for what ive seen you talk.
so i think we men on the thread need to hear your cientific experience , tell us how big were the biggest dudes you have seen ( in real life in person only), and how many you think 7' + you have seen irl. And if you dont mind to tell, how many guys have you been in total aprox?
This could clarify a lot, i hope you dont mind to speak about your experience, and im sorry to ask
But, ive a question for the queen of the thread, i know you are quite smart and knowledged woman for what ive seen you talk.
so i think we men on the thread need to hear your cientific experience , tell us how big were the biggest dudes you have seen ( in real life in person only), and how many you think 7' + you have seen irl. And if you dont mind to tell, how many guys have you been in total aprox?
This could clarify a lot, i hope you dont mind to speak about your experience, and im sorry to ask
like2Feelabig1
Legendary Member
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2019
- Posts
- 453
- Media
- 3
- Likes
- 2,333
- Points
- 288
- Location
- London, England, GB
- Sexuality
- 100% Straight, 0% Gay
- Gender
- Female
Not really the place for this kind of research is it? TP might disagree and seeing as its her thread thats fine, but this is to find a 10" cock, not to conduct a survey on sizes people have encountered in life.
Nah, just looking for talk about how much common 7 - 9 inch are irl to wonder myself how much posible is the 10" guy to appear.
My bad if It is off topic, just wanting to know the view of a knowledged woman, cause every girl i Talk to is so missinformed
like2Feelabig1
Legendary Member
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2019
- Posts
- 453
- Media
- 3
- Likes
- 2,333
- Points
- 288
- Location
- London, England, GB
- Sexuality
- 100% Straight, 0% Gay
- Gender
- Female
Let me help you then, I consider myself a 'knowledged' woman by experience, if it helps you, 7" are very rare, 8" extremely extremely rare, 9" are pretty much mythical.... all assuming accurate measurement.
There is enough science out there that pretty much answers the question. Here you will only get fake stats.
Thanks for sharing your opinion. Sure you must be right. But i dont like the terms rare, very rare, etc.
I think they are not specific enough. So i think to talk bout penis we should say the number we've seen irl. For example, if youve seen around 30 cock, and then you say four of them were around 7" and just two were 8". Thats what should count to me. Other way is not very clear and leads to missunderstandig.
Im a bit sceptic about 7 and 8 inches being so much uncommon, because of my experience. Tell me what you all think about that experience:
Ive seen very few dicks in person, and they all were soft.
But read me cause im telling the truth.
i was on a swimming formation in which we were about 15 young males (around 20 of age). We were all together in the showers each day, and certainly most looked average, but there was 2 dudes that looked 5.5 inch soft, and one dude that looked 6 inch minimum soft, It was so big really, i think that he was even 6.5 or 7, soft he was my size while hard, if not more. I really think that guy must be 8 " hard 100%.
I know my experience doesnt count as It were all soft but, i doubt anyone hard stays almost the same size as soft. He has to have a really big hard around 8 or 9.
And its not a perception mistake or over estimated size, cause as i said, all the rest were average or even small. Also i can tell that the rest of the dudes on the formation made funny coments about that one dude, saying he has an anaconda and bla, bla, bla.. so believe me he was impressive.
ive seen Danny d soft, also other 8+ pornstars soft, and i guarantee you the dude on my formation was longer and thicker.
Tho dont you imagine a 8 or 9 soft monster. It was around 6 or 7 imo
So, just seeing 15 cocks in my whole life, 2 were big, and one was huge, even soft.
If the "really rare" are true, i should needed to see many more dicks to find a guy like him right?...
Maybe It was just coincidence and to find another one like him i would have to see a lot. But is rare that on my first time seeing other guys dick i found one, you know what i mean xd
No, not at all. On so many levels. Low numbers are useless to make a statement. You even could have seen 2 dicks in your life and be lucky enough for both of them being huge. Do you know the law of large numbers?
How i could have seen just 2 dick and them be huge?
Not makes any sense. I dont know that law, explain me if u dont care.
But i base my idea in the same way poker works, the chance to get a Royal flush is really small. Ive been playing poker for 4 years and ive seen It 3 times only and appeared really randomly while playing for 5 hours straight or so. So you telling me that i could have seen It in my first 3 hands? Wtf, i think no one that has ever played poker has seen even a full house in his first ever hand. And full House appears easily after playing for 40 hands or so that is about 20 min
My point is that if your first time seeing a man dick in person and It is a huge one, how tf is It posible that this is so extremely rare? Its almost imposible, based on probs It should be a lower percentage of rarity
like2Feelabig1
Legendary Member
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2019
- Posts
- 453
- Media
- 3
- Likes
- 2,333
- Points
- 288
- Location
- London, England, GB
- Sexuality
- 100% Straight, 0% Gay
- Gender
- Female
I tried to help you but I think now you're a troll..... can we get back to not finding a 10" dick please everyone?
Im not a troll, be sure of that. My objetive is not to say bullshit on a forum plenty of strangers.. what ive said is true, but Who knows maybe that guy was just a extreme shower that grows just a bit im erect, that could be possible too.
Anyways thank for your help, its good that women like you try to Inform guys and men about that stuff that is plenty of disgusting sexual and social fantasy and almost discrimination towards the 75% of men who are not Big and feel inferior and trash just for the size of an organ
Its so disgusting if you look at It from a different perspective, removing your sexual interest and looking at how Dumb all the apes of our specie are just getting crazy excited just for the size of an organ of the male body xd i wish we could evolve a bit more and be superior to that kind of stupid things. But we re just stupid animals
Ok, I get that you don't understand statistics and probability. But since you talk about poker. The probability of a full house is roughly 0.144%. That basically means that yes, plenty of people did have a full house on their first hand. As a matter of fact in 2000 people playing the probability of at least one of them having a full house on their first hand is above 99%. And it's the same for dicks. If the chance to find a huge one is 0.1% plenty of people will see a huge one as their first one. And while the chances that somebody will find 2 huge ones in their first 2 penises are very low, it still happens.
You misunderstand low chances for impossibility. But low chances don't mean it's impossible. So your anectodal evidence (very low numbers) doesn't mean anything when it comes to making a claim about reality.
Anyways, not gonna derail the thready any more with basically common knowledge.
Okey i get you. Is not that basically common knowledge Imo. Most people dont ever thought about that. But i get you now.
Anyways im still sceptical about i have been so lucky to find It on my first time. Im on the 1% of people? Its hard to believe honestly, moreover when specially 2 of the 15 guys were really Big.
But thinking cientifically i get your point and could you be right. I would need to see a big number of penis, at least 40 / 50 cock to the real probs shown up. is that what you mean right?
And yes, sorry for derail the thread a bit
